Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Equality of whom? Social groups and judgments of injustice.Iris Marion Young - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (1):1–18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Groups and the equal protection clause.Owen M. Fiss - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (2):107-177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.Allen Buchanan & Robert O. Keohane - 2006 - Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4):405-437.
    The authors articulate a global public standard for the normative legitimacy of global governance institutions. This standard can provide the basis for principled criticism of global governance institutions and guide reform efforts in circumstances in which people disagree deeply about the demands of global justice and the role that global governance institutions should play in meeting them.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   95 citations  
  • IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   334 citations  
  • The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
    We do not live in a just world. This may be the least controversial claim one could make in political theory. But it is much less clear what, if anything, justice on a world scale might mean, or what the hope for justice should lead us to want in the domain of international or global institutions, and in the policies of states that are in a position to affect the world order. By comparison with the perplexing and undeveloped state of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   465 citations  
  • Social Difference as a Political Resource.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - In Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
    Critics of a politics of difference have misidentified these social movements as asserting an identity politics of recognition. Most of these movements are better understood as resisting unjust structural inequalities. Inclusive democratic process involves paying specific attention to group differences in order to transform preferences and maximize social knowledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  • Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice[Link].Iris Marion Young - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (1):1-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Multiculturalism, Identity Claims, and Human Rights: From Politics to Courts.Neus Torbisco-Casals - 2016 - The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (2):367-404.
    Journal Name: The Law & Ethics of Human Rights Issue: Ahead of print.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Beyond Altruism? Globalizing Democracy in the Age of Distrust.Neus Torbisco Casals - 2015 - The Monist 98 (4):457-474.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Judging Virtuously: Developing an Empathic Capacity for Perceptual Sensitivity.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2014 - Jurisprudence 5 (1):196-208.
    Judging Virtuously: Developing an Empathic Capacity for Perceptual Sensitivity: A Review of Amalia Amaya and Ho Hock Lai , Law, Virtue and Justice.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review.John Hart Ely - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (3):481-487.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations