Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman - 2004 - Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
    We propose that aesthetic pleasure is a function of the perceiver's processing dynamics: The more fluently perceivers can process an object, the more positive their aesthetic response. We review variables known to influence aesthetic judgments, such as figural goodness, figure-ground contrast, stimulus repetition, symmetry, and prototypicality, and trace their effects to changes in processing fluency. Other variables that influence processing fluency, like visual or semantic priming, similarly increase judgments of aesthetic pleasure. Our proposal provides an integrative framework for the study (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   124 citations  
  • Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.Helmut Leder, Juergen Goller, Tanya Rigotti & Michael Forster - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • What is "special" about face perception?Martha J. Farah, Kevin D. Wilson, Maxwell Drain & James N. Tanaka - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (3):482-498.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  • Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.Judith Langlois, Lisa Kalakanis, Adam Rubenstein, Andrea Larson, Monica Hallam & Monica Smoot - 2000 - Psychological Bulletin 126 (3):390.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Cultural and Developmental Comparisons of Landscape Perceptions and Preferences.Thomas R. Herzog, Eugene J. Herbert, Rachel Kaplan & C. L. Crooks - 2000 - Environment and Behavior 32 (3):323-346.
    The authors compared several Australian subgroups and American college students on their preferences for Australian natural landscapes. Preference correlations across groups were generally high, with the correlations for Australian adults somewhat lower. Factor analysis yielded six perceptual categories: Vegetation, Open Smooth, Open Coarse, Rivers, Agrarian, and Structures. Both the Australian and American samples liked Rivers best and the Open categories least. Only the Australians included willow trees in the Agrarian category. The Australians liked the settings overall better than the Americans. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations