Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Twentieth-Century Phlogiston: Constructing Error and Differentiating Domains.Douglas Allchin - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (1):81-127.
    In the 1950s–60s biochemists searched intensively for a series of high-energy molecules in the cell. Although we now believe that these molecules do not exist, biochemists claimed to have isolated or identified them on at least sixteen occasions. The episode parallels the familiar eighteenth-century case of phlogiston, in illustrating how error is not simply the loss of facts but, instead, must be actively constructed. In addition, the debates surrounding each case demonstrate how revolutionary-scale disagreement is sometimes resolved by differentiating or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Cellular and theoretical chimeras: Piecing together how cells process energy.Douglas Allchin - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):31-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Experiments Are the Key: Participants' Histories and Historians' Histories of Science.G. Gilbert & Michael Mulkay - 1984 - Isis 75 (1):105-125.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Appreciating Key Experiments.Joseph D. Robinson - 1986 - British Journal for the History of Science 19 (1):51-56.
    Gilbert and Mulkay, in their paper ‘Experiments Are the Key’, present responses of scientists to questions about the development of the chemiosmotic hypothesis of energy coupling in oxidative and photophosphorylation, and infer from these responses both the meaninglessness of the concept ‘key experiment’ and the hopelessness of searching for any data as a bedrock for historical analysis. Gilbert and Mulkay's nihilism is, however, rooted in a lack of understanding of the specific scientific issues involved. A closer look at a proposed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Experiment and Conceptual Change-Evidence, Data Generation, and Scientific Practice: Toward a Reliabilist Philosophy of Experiment-Why Philosophical Theories of Evidence Are (and Ought to Be).Deborah Mayo & Peter Achinstein - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):S180-S192.
    There are two reasons, I claim, scientists do and should ignore standard philosophical theories of objective evidence: Such theories propose concepts that are far too weak to give scientists what they want from evidence, viz., a good reason to believe a hypothesis; and They provide concepts that make the evidential relationship a priori, whereas typically establishing an evidential claim requires empirical investigation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Why philosophical theories of evidence are (and ought to be) ignored by scientists.Peter Achinstein - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):180-192.
    There are two reasons, I claim, scientists do and should ignore standard philosophical theories of objective evidence: (1) Such theories propose concepts that are far too weak to give scientists what they want from evidence, viz., a good reason to believe a hypothesis; and (2) They provide concepts that make the evidential relationship a priori, whereas typically establishing an evidential claim requires empirical investigation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations