- (1 other version)The law of group polarization.Cass R. Sunstein - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.details
|
|
A Non-Paternalistic Model of Research Ethics and Oversight: Assessing the Benefits of Prospective Review.Alex John London - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):930-944.details
|
|
The social impact of majorities and minorities.Bibb Latané & Sharon Wolf - 1981 - Psychological Review 88 (5):438-453.details
|
|
Perceptions and Experiences of Community Members Serving on Institutional Review Boards: A Questionnaire Based Study.M. S. Kuyare, Padmaja A. Marathe, S. S. Kuyare & U. M. Thatte - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (1):61-77.details
|
|
Us irbs confronting research in the developing world.Robert L. Klitzman - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (2):63-73.details
|
|
How IRB leaders view and approach challenges raised by industry-funded research.R. Klitzman - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (3):9-17.details
|
|
How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence: Table 1.Robert Klitzman - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):224.details
|
|
The IRB paradox: Could the protectors also encourage deceit?Patricia Keith-Spiegel & Gerald P. Koocher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (4):339 – 349.details
|
|
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.details
|
|
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jurgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.details
|
|
The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.details
|
|
Who decides? A look at ethics committee membership.Raymond de Vries & Carl P. Forsberg - 2002 - HEC Forum 14 (3):252-258.details
|
|
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.C. A. Schuppli & D. Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):294-301.details
|
|
The silent majority: Who speaks at IRB meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.details
|
|
Nonscientist IRB Members at the NIH.Robert Allison, Lura Abbott & Alison Wichman - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (5):8-13.details
|
|
How Unaffiliated/Nonscientist Members of Institutional Review Boards See Their Roles.Joan P. Porter - 1987 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 9 (6):1.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Law of Group Polarization.Cass Sunstein - 2003 - In James S. Fishkin & Peter Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 80–101.details
|
|
What Are the Ideal Characteristics of Unaffiliated/Nonscientist IRB Members?Joan P. Porter - 1986 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (3):1.details
|
|
What IRBs Could Learn from Corporate Boards.Richard S. Saver - 2005 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (5):1.details
|
|