Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Apomediated World: Regulating Research When Social Media Has Changed Research.Dan O’Connor - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):470-483.
    Social media, meaning digital technologies and platforms such as blogs, wikis, forums, content aggregators, sharing sites, and social networks like Facebook and Twitter, have profoundly changed the way that information can be shared online. Now, almost anyone with a broadband internet connection or a smart phone can share ideas, data, and opinions with just about anyone else on the planet. This change has serious implications for the way in which human subjects research can be conducted and, concomitantly, for the ways (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Internet-based crowdsourcing and research ethics: the case for IRB review.Mark A. Graber & Abraham Graber - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):115-118.
    The recent success of Foldit in determining the structure of the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (M-PMV) retroviral protease is suggestive of the power-solving potential of internet-facilitated game-like crowdsourcing. This research model is highly novel, however, and thus, deserves careful consideration of potential ethical issues. In this paper, we will demonstrate that the crowdsourcing model of research has the potential to cause harm to participants, manipulates the participant into continued participation, and uses participants as experimental subjects. We conclude that protocols relying on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals.Anna Wexler - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4):211-215.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations