Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.Sara Goering, Eran Klein, Laura Specker Sullivan, Anna Wexler, Blaise Agüera Y. Arcas, Guoqiang Bi, Jose M. Carmena, Joseph J. Fins, Phoebe Friesen, Jack Gallant, Jane E. Huggins, Philipp Kellmeyer, Adam Marblestone, Christine Mitchell, Erik Parens, Michelle Pham, Alan Rubel, Norihiro Sadato, Mina Teicher, David Wasserman, Meredith Whittaker, Jonathan Wolpaw & Rafael Yuste - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (3):365-386.
    Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators, will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Neuroenhancement.Alexandre Erler & Cynthia Forlini - 2020 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online.
    Entry on "Neuroenhancement" in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies.Karola V. Kreitmair - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):152-166.
    Not too long ago, neurotechnology was the purview of the clinic and research. In 2011, researchers at Brown University succeeded for the first time in using an implanted sensor in the brain of a pa...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Do Publics Share Experts’ Concerns about Brain–Computer Interfaces? A Trinational Survey on the Ethics of Neural Technology.Matthew Sample, Sebastian Sattler, David Rodriguez-Arias, Stefanie Blain-Moraes & Eric Racine - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 2019 (6):1242-1270.
    Since the 1960s, scientists, engineers, and healthcare professionals have developed brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies, connecting the user’s brain activity to communication or motor devices. This new technology has also captured the imagination of publics, industry, and ethicists. Academic ethics has highlighted the ethical challenges of BCIs, although these conclusions often rely on speculative or conceptual methods rather than empirical evidence or public engagement. From a social science or empirical ethics perspective, this tendency could be considered problematic and even technocratic because (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Can Neuromodulation also Enhance Social Inequality? Some Possible Indirect Interventions of the State.Andrea Lavazza - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Present and Emerging Ethical Issues with tDCS use: A Summary and Review.Parker Day, Jack Twiddy & Veljko Dubljević - 2022 - Neuroethics 16 (1):1-25.
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique known for its relative safety and minimal invasiveness. tDCS has demonstrated efficacy as a potential treatment for certain neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, and has been shown to enhance a range of cognitive abilities under certain contexts. As a result, this technique has captured the interest of both the research community and the public at large. However, efforts to gather information about the effects of tDCS on the brain are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Health Aspirations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).Sophie Sargent & Judy Illes - 2024 - Neuroethics 17 (1):1-23.
    Advances in neuroscience have enabled the transition of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) from research and clinical settings to public use. For this primarily home-based context, tDCS has been popularized as a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach to improved cognition and wellness. The line between wellness and health is blurry, however, and little is known about how engagement with therapeutic tDCS impacts users’ interactions with other interventions such as clinical consultations, pharmacotherapy, complementary medicine, and even other neurotechnology. To close this gap, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation.Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer, Nina Frahm & Sophia Knopf - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (1):1-20.
    Like many ethics debates surrounding emerging technologies, neuroethics is increasingly concerned with the private sector. Here, entrepreneurial visions and claims of how neurotechnology innovation will revolutionize society—from brain-computer-interfaces to neural enhancement and cognitive phenotyping—are confronted with public and policy concerns about the risks and ethical challenges related to such innovations. But while neuroethics frameworks have a longer track record in public sector research such as the U.S. BRAIN Initiative, much less is known about how businesses—and especially start-ups—address ethics in tech (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Pediatric Populations—– Voices from Typically Developing Children and Adolescents and their Parents.Anna Sierawska, Maike Splittgerber, Vera Moliadze, Michael Siniatchkin & Alena Buyx - 2022 - Neuroethics 16 (1):1-17.
    Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique currently being researched as an alternative or complimentary treatment for various neurological disorders. There is little knowledge about experiences of the participants of tDCS clinical research, especially from pediatric studies. Methods An interview study with typically developing minors (n = 19, mean age 13,66 years) participating in a tDCS study, and their parents (n = 18) was conducted to explore their views and experiences and inform the ethical analysis. Results (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Sports Performance.Dylan J. Edwards, Mar Cortes, Susan Wortman-Jutt, David Putrino, Marom Bikson, Gary Thickbroom & Alvaro Pascual-Leone - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Crowdsourced tDCS Research: Feasible or Fanciful?Anna Wexler & Roy H. Hamilton - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (1):50-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mapping Controversies in Neuroscience: The Plastic Brain and “Anecdotal Data”.Kirill Petrov - 2020 - Sociology of Power 32 (2):183-207.
    The study of controversies is an important methodological tool for understanding key aspects of scientific activity that are invisible from within the science itself. Following Sarah Whatmore, we argue that controversies are a force field within which there is a redistribution of expertise. As an application of the basic principles of ANT, the mapping of controversies lacks the disadvantages of constructivist and epistemological approaches to science. While preserving the validity of scientific facts, it could demonstrate the practice of finding allies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark