Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation.Nicholas S. Fitz & Peter B. Reiner - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5):410-412.
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a simple means of brain stimulation, possesses a trifecta of appealing features: it is relatively safe, relatively inexpensive and relatively effective. It is also relatively easy to obtain a device and the do-it-yourself (DIY) community has become galvanised by reports that tDCS can be used as an all-purpose cognitive enhancer. We provide practical recommendations designed to guide balanced discourse, propagate norms of safe use and stimulate dialogue between the DIY community and regulatory authorities. We call (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices : extending the medical model.Hannah Maslen, Thomas Douglas, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Neil Levy & Julian Savulescu - 2014 - Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1 (1):68-93.
    This article presents a model for regulating cognitive enhancement devices. Recently, it has become very easy for individuals to purchase devices which directly modulate brain function. For example, transcranial direct current stimulators are increasingly being produced and marketed online as devices for cognitive enhancement. Despite posing risks in a similar way to medical devices, devices that do not make any therapeutic claims do not have to meet anything more than basic product safety standards. We present the case for extending existing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Do-it-yourself brain stimulation: a regulatory model.Hannah Maslen, Tom Douglas, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Neil Levy & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5):413-414.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations