Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Preformation and pre-existence in the seventeenth century: A brief analysis.Peter J. Bowler - 1971 - Journal of the History of Biology 4 (2):221-244.
    It is beyond the scope of this paper to describe in detail the rise to popularity of the emboîtement theories during the last decades of the seventeenth century.51 Eventually the theories did gain great influence, but some points emerging from the above discussion indicate that the rise to popularity was not, perhaps, quite as rapid as has sometimes been assumed.52 Although the earlier preformation theories were sometimes regarded as the ancestors of the later ideas,53 there was little intellectual continuity between (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate.Shirley A. Roe - 1981
    A case-study of the interaction between philosophical context and observational data in the practice of Science.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Review: The History of Embryology as Intellectual History. [REVIEW]Frederick B. Churchill - 1970 - Journal of the History of Biology 3 (1):155 - 181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • From mechanism to vitalism in eighteenth-century English physiology.Theodore M. Brown - 1974 - Journal of the History of Biology 7 (2):179-216.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • James Keill, George Cheyne, and Newtonian physiology, 1690?1740.Anita Guerrini - 1985 - Journal of the History of Biology 18 (2):247-266.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • An Enquiry Into the Origin of the Human Appetites and Affections [by J. Long.].James Long & Barr - 1747
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Influence of Malebranche on the Science of Mechanics during the Eighteenth Century.Thomas L. Hankins - 1967 - Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (2):193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Two early modern concepts of mind: Reflecting substance vs. thinking substance.Emily Michael & Frederick S. Michael - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1):29-48.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Companion to the History of Modern Science.M. J. S. Hodge, R. C. Olby, N. Cantor & J. R. R. Christie - 1989 - In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie & M. J. S. Hodge (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The history of embryology as intellectual history.Frederick B. Churchill - 1970 - Journal of the History of Biology 3 (1):155-181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Observations on man.David Hartley - 1791 - Washington, D.C.: Woodstock Books.
    First published in 1749, Hartley's great work was abridged by Priestley in 1775 and reissued as a whole by Joseph Johnson in 1791. To Priestley, who founded his Unitarianism on the Observations, it seemed that Hartley was the greatest of human beings with the single exception of Jesus. Coleridge adopted his associationist theology in the mid 1790s, naming his eldest son David Hartley Coleridge, and passing on to Wordsworth the theory of mind that underlies 'Tintern Abbey', the early Prelude and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Mechanical and “Organical” Models in Seventeenth-Century Explanations of Biological Reproduction.Daniel C. Fouke - 1989 - Science in Context 3 (2):365-381.
    The ArgumentThe claim that Jan Swammerdam's empirical research did not support his theory of biological preformation is shown to rest on a notion of evidence narrower than that used by many seventeenth-century natural philosophers. The principles of evidence behind the use of mechanical models are developed. It is then shown that the Cartesian theory of biological reproduction and embryology failed to gain acceptance because it did not meet the evidential requirements of these principles. The problems in this and other mechanistic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations