Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    What would something unlike us--a chimpanzee, say, or a computer--have to be able to do to qualify as a possible knower, like us? To answer this question at the very heart of our sense of ourselves, philosophers have long focused on intentionality and have looked to language as a key to this condition. Making It Explicit is an investigation into the nature of language--the social practices that distinguish us as rational, logical creatures--that revises the very terms of this inquiry. Where (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   992 citations  
  • (1 other version)„What is a Theory of Meaning?(I)” in: Guttenplan, S.Michael Dummett - 1975 - In Samuel D. Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and language. Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  • Meaning.Paul Horwich - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    In this new book, the author of the classic Truth presents an original theory of meaning, demonstrates its richness, and defends it against all contenders. He surveys the diversity of twentieth-century philosophical insights into meaning and shows that his theory can reconcile these with a common-sense view of meaning as derived from use. Meaning and its companion volume Truth (now published in a revised edition) together demystify two central issues in philosophy and offer a controversial but compelling view of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   266 citations  
  • Realism, Meaning and Truth.Crispin Wright - 1986 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • The problem of non-conclusiveness.Paolo Casalegno - 2002 - Topoi 21 (1-2):75-86.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Yes and no.I. Rumfitt - 2000 - Mind 109 (436):781-823.
    In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  • Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   948 citations  
  • (1 other version)Deflationist views of meaning and content.Hartry Field - 1994 - Mind 103 (411):249-285.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   224 citations