Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. To Name or to Describe: Shared Knowledge Affects Referential Form.Daphna Heller, Kristen S. Gorman & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):290-305.
    The notion of common ground is important for the production of referring expressions: In order for a referring expression to be felicitous, it has to be based on shared information. But determining what information is shared and what information is privileged may require gathering information from multiple sources, and constantly coordinating and updating them, which might be computationally too intensive to affect the earliest moments of production. Previous work has found that speakers produce overinformative referring expressions, which include privileged names, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Individual differences in switching and inhibition predict perspective-taking across the lifespan.Madeleine R. Long, William S. Horton, Hannah Rohde & Antonella Sorace - 2018 - Cognition 170 (C):25-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Collective Contexts in Conversation: Grounding by Proxy.Arash Eshghi & Patrick G. T. Healey - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (2):299-324.
    Anecdotal evidence suggests that participants in conversation can sometimes act as a coalition. This implies a level of conversational organization in which groups of individuals form a coherent unit. This paper investigates the implications of this phenomenon for psycholinguistic and semantic models of shared context in dialog. We present a corpus study of multiparty dialog which shows that, in certain circumstances, people with different levels of overt involvement in a conversation, that is, one responding and one not, can nonetheless access (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Christine Gunlogson & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):1122-1134.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Referring as a collaborative process.Herbert H. Clark & Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs - 1986 - Cognition 22 (1):1-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   194 citations  
  • (1 other version)Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.H. Clark - 2002 - Cognition 84 (1):73-111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  • (1 other version)Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.Michael K. Tanenhaus Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Christine Gunlogson - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):1122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking.Jean E. Fox Tree & Herbert H. Clark - 1997 - Cognition 62 (2):151-167.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production.William S. Horton & Richard J. Gerrig - 2005 - Cognition 96 (2):127-142.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • (1 other version)Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.Herbert H. Clark & Jean E. Fox Tree - 2002 - Cognition 84 (1):73-111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations