- Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (1):57-79.details
|
|
Argumentum ad Verecundiam.John Woods & Douglas Walton - 1974 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 7 (3):135 - 153.details
|
|
Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development. [REVIEW]J. Anthony Blair - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):365-379.details
|
|
(3 other versions)A plea for excuses.John Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.details
|
|
(1 other version)Introduction to logic.Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen & Victor Rodych (eds.) - 1968 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Fallacies.Hans Hansen - 2015 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.details
|
|
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts.John R. Searle - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):270-271.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Introduction to Logic.Irving M. Copi - 1954 - Philosophy 29 (110):271-271.details
|
|
Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):175-195.details
|
|
Logic.Stan Baronett - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.details
|
|
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.details
|
|
Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam.Jean Goodwin - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (2):267-280.details
|
|
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.J. L. Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1):1-30.details
|
|
Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1):63-65.details
|
|
Logic, or, The art of thinking: containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment.Antoine Arnauld - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Pierre Nicole & Jill Vance Buroker.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|
The Lvov–Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory.Marcin Koszowy & Michał Araszkiewicz - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):283-300.details
|
|
Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies.John Woods & Douglas N. Walton - 1982 - Toronto, Canada: Mcgraw-Hill Ryerson.details
|
|
How to Disagree About Argument Schemes.Fábio Perin Shecaira - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):500-522.details
|
|
Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (1):59-73.details
|
|
Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems.Douglas Walton & Marcin Koszowy - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (4):483-496.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Uses of Argument.Frederick L. Will & Stephen Toulmin - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (3):399.details
|
|
Experts and Bias: When is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound? [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):355-370.details
|
|
The Nature and Limits of Authority.R. T. DeGEORGE - 1985details
|
|