This article is the result of my doctoral dissertation. In this work, I (hereafter: the writer) consider Aramesh Dustdar's main thesis "Emtenae Tafakor" and give my interpretation of it, "Emtenae Tafakor" is the main content of Dustdar's view on faith and reason in the epistemology of religion. In addition, the writer moves to theocracy and argues that Aramesh Dustdar could not provide attainable ideas and arguments against theocracy in the social and political philosophy. Straightforwardly, the (...) aforementioned claim has been based on a low level of proficiency of Aramesh Dustdar in social and political philosophy and the philosophy of law, and the writer will articulate this claim via some quotations from Aramesh Dustdar’s works and then criticize them. (shrink)

In this article, I (Hereafter: the writer) will indicate two misunderstandings about The Impossibility of Thinking in the Religious Culture (Hereafter: The Impossibility of Thinking or "Emtenae Tafakor"), also the writer will argue a true perusal of Aramesh Dustdar's the Impossibility of Thinking could not be comparable with a true understanding of Javad Tabatabai's the Conditions of Impossibility (Or "Sharaayete Emtenae") since the former is about the faith and reason in the epistemology of religion but the latter is (...) about the history of philosophy of social science. (shrink)