Can John Stuart Mill’s radicalism achieve liberal egalitarian ends? Joseph Persky’s The Political Economy of Progress is a provocative and compelling discussion of Mill’s economic thought. It is also a defense of radical political economy. Providing valuable historical context, Persky traces Mill’s intellectual journey as an outspoken proponent of laissez-faire to a cautious supporter of co-operative socialism. I propose two problems with Persky’s optimistic take on radical social reform. First, demands for substantive equality have led past radicals to (...) endorse exclusionary nationalist and eugenics policies. It pushes some contemporary radicals towards illiberal interventions into intimate social life. Second, the radical critique of capitalism relies on an account of profit that neglects the epistemic function of private-property markets. Once this is acknowledged, capitalism retains some progressive credentials against radical alternatives. (shrink)

The book titled The Collaborative Economy in Action: European Perspectives is one of the important outcomes of the COST Action CA16121, From Sharing to Caring: Examining the Socio-Technical Aspects of the Collaborative Economy that was active between March 2017 and September 2021. The Action was funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology - COST. The main objective of the COST Action Sharing and Caring is the development of a European network of researchers and practitioners interested in (...) investigating the collaborative economy models, platforms, and their socio-technological implications. The network involves scholars, practitioners, communities, and policymakers. The COST Action Sharing and Caring helped to connect research initiatives across Europe and enabled scientists to develop their ideas by collaborating with peers. This collaboration opportunity represented a boost for the participants’ research, careers, and innovation potential. The main aim of this book is to provide a comprehensive overview of the collaborative economy in European countries with a variety of its aspects for a deeper understanding of the phenomenon as a whole. For this reason, in July 2017, an open call for country reports was distributed among the members of the COST Action Sharing and Caring. Representatives of the member countries were invited to produce short country reports covering: definition of the CE; types and models of the CE; key stakeholders involved; as well as legislation and technological tools relevant for the CE. Submitted reports varied in length and regarding the level of detail included, in accordance with how much information was available in each respective country at the time of writing. Editors of the book have compiled these early reports into a summary report, which was intended as a first step in mapping the state of the CE in Europe. The Member Countries Report on the Collaborative Economy, edited by Gaia Mosconi, Agnieszka Lukasiewicz, and Gabriela Avram that was published on the Sharing and Caring website, represented its first synergetic outcome and provided an overview of the CE phenomenon as interpreted and manifested in each of the countries part of the network. Additionally, Sergio Nassare-Aznar, Kosjenka Dumančić, and Giulia Priora compiled a Preliminary Legal Analysis of Country Reports on Cases of Collaborative Economy. In 2018, after undertaking an analysis of the previous reports’ strengths and weaknesses, the book editors issued a call for an updated version of these country reports. Prof. Ann Light advised the editorial team, proposing a new format for country reports and 4000 words limit. The template included: Introduction, Definition, Key Questions, Examples, Illustration, Context, Developments, Issues, Other Major Players, and Relevant Literature. The new template was approved by the Management Committee in October 2018. The task force that had supported the production of the first series of country reports acted as mentors for the team of authors in each country. The final reports arrived at the end of 2018, bringing the total number of submissions to 30. A call for book editors was issued, and a new editorial team was formed by volunteers from the participants of the COST Action: Andrzej Klimczuk, Vida Česnuityte, Cristina Miguel, Santa Mijalche, Gabriela Avram, Bori Simonovits, Bálint Balázs, Kostas Stefanidis, and Rafael Laurenti. The editorial team organized the double-blind reviews of reports and communicated to the authors the requirements for improving their texts. After reviews, the authors submitted updated versions of their country reports providing up-to-date interdisciplinary analysis on the state of the CE in 2019, when the reports were collected. During the final phase, the chapters were again reviewed by the lead editors together with all editorial team members. At the time, the intention was to update these reports again just before the end of the COST Action Sharing and Caring in 2021 and to produce a third edition. However, the COVID-19 pandemic changed these plans. Thus, this final volume was created by 82 scholars-editors and contributors-and consists of reports on 27 countries participating in the COST Action. M4 - Citavi. (shrink)

The term collaborative economy itself is relatively new, and according to the European Commission, the term is used interchangeably with the term sharing economy. The term SE was frequently used when early models, such as Airbnb or ZipCar, appeared and gained popularity, especially in the United States, but it was afterwards substituted with the term CE in the European contexts. The country reports in this collection often use the two terms interchangeably, further illustrating the fact that a generally (...) agreed definition is still missing. However, the ambition driving the term CE is to create specific European economic models with greater emphasis on the community’s involvement. In Europe, it is still the case that the definition of the CE and SE remains fuzzy, including both non-profit and for-profit models, supported by both monetary and non-monetary exchanges among participants. The phenomenon is complex, covering various fields of activity, as well as operating at various levels, ranging from the international to the national, regional, and local. Some definitions focus mostly on sustainability, while others highlight technological and financial aspects and business models specific to the phenomenon. This chapter is organized as follows. First, a short overview of the basic theoretical approaches to CE is presented. Further, the structure of the book is discussed in detail, and the text closes with a summary. M4 - Citavi. (shrink)

Michael Goldhaber, who popularized the term the attention economy, said of the US Capitol insurrection: “It felt like an expression of a world in which everyone is desperately seeking their own audience and fracturing reality in the process. I only see that accelerating.” If we don’t do something about this, American democracy may not survive. For when there is no longer any common ground of evidence and reason, history shows that misinformation will eventually overwhelm public discourse and authoritarianism can (...) take over. That is precisely what dictators across the world gleefully anticipate will happen in the US. The Biden administration could combat this by establishing a digital fairness doctrine for the twenty-first century. This would not mean setting up a government agency as the arbiter of truth. The purpose of such a doctrine is simply to preserve the possibility of a functioning national discourse on critical issues of public interest. It would not run afoul of First Amendment free speech guarantees, given that it would do nothing to block speech itself. In fact, it would expand and enrich national conversations, by preventing echo chambers prone to systematic bias. (shrink)

A Sustainable Well-Being Economy (SWBE): A Holistic Alternative to Capitalism -/- Abstract -/- This paper proposes the concept of a Sustainable Well-Being Economy (SWBE), an alternative economic model designed to address the limitations of capitalism, such as inequality, environmental degradation, and the unchecked pursuit of profit. By combining elements of various economic systems—including resource-based economies, democratic socialism, cooperative economics, and sustainability principles—this paper outlines how SWBE can create a balanced, equitable, and ecologically sound framework for future economic development. (...) The SWBE focuses on long-term ecological sustainability, the well-being of individuals, and democratic decision-making processes to ensure that economic systems are responsive to both human and environmental needs. -/- Introduction -/- The current global economic system, largely driven by capitalist principles, has achieved unprecedented levels of wealth generation, but it has also led to significant societal and environmental challenges. These include growing economic inequality, environmental degradation, resource depletion, and social exclusion. The pursuit of profit, often unregulated, has resulted in exploitative practices that prioritize short-term gain over long-term sustainability. As a result, there is an urgent need for alternative economic models that not only ensure financial stability but also promote social well-being, environmental sustainability, and equitable distribution of resources. -/- This paper presents the Sustainable Well-Being Economy (SWBE), a new economic paradigm that integrates aspects of resource-based economies, cooperative economics, democratic socialism, sustainability, and well-being as its core principles. The SWBE emphasizes a shift away from profit-driven motives toward a system that balances environmental stewardship, economic equity, and human flourishing. -/- Theoretical Framework -/- The SWBE is a hybrid economic model that combines principles from various systems, each of which provides an essential element for creating a sustainable and just society. The key components of SWBE include: -/- 1. Resource-Based Economy: The SWBE adopts a resource-based framework, where the allocation of resources is determined based on availability and need rather than the profit motive. This system emphasizes sustainability and uses technology to monitor and manage resource use. By optimizing production and consumption processes, the SWBE ensures that ecological limits are respected and natural resources are used efficiently. -/- 2. Cooperative Economics: The SWBE incorporates the principles of cooperative economics, where businesses and industries, especially essential sectors, are organized as worker cooperatives. In these cooperatives, workers share ownership and decision-making power. Profits are distributed equitably among the workers, ensuring that wealth is not concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or corporate elites. This model also fosters greater job satisfaction and social cohesion by giving individuals more control over their work environment. -/- 3. Democratic Socialism: The SWBE also integrates elements of democratic socialism, ensuring that key industries, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, are publicly owned and managed. By removing the profit motive from these essential services, the SWBE ensures that access is based on need rather than ability to pay. The democratic aspect allows citizens to participate in decision-making processes, ensuring that policies align with public interests and social welfare. -/- 4. Sustainability and Ecological Balance: Central to the SWBE is a commitment to environmental sustainability. The model encourages the use of renewable energy, reduces waste through a circular economy approach, and emphasizes eco-friendly manufacturing practices. Technologies and policies that minimize carbon emissions, resource depletion, and pollution are integrated into every aspect of the economy. -/- 5. Well-Being and Human Flourishing: The SWBE shifts the focus of the economy from mere financial growth to the well-being of individuals. Economic success is measured not by GDP alone but by indicators such as life satisfaction, health outcomes, social relationships, and personal development. The well-being of people is prioritized, ensuring that all citizens have access to the resources they need to lead fulfilling lives. -/- Core Principles of the Sustainable Well-Being Economy -/- 1. Resource Efficiency and Ecological Stewardship: The SWBE operates within the planet’s ecological limits, ensuring that resources are allocated based on their availability and capacity to renew. By using technology and data, the system can track the sustainable use of resources, prevent waste, and promote renewable practices. Businesses are incentivized to minimize environmental harm, optimize product life cycles, and prioritize recycling. -/- 2. Democratic Decision-Making: Decision-making within the SWBE is decentralized and democratic. Businesses, governments, and communities would operate on principles of shared ownership and collective decision-making. In worker cooperatives, employees have an equal say in the management and direction of the company. Similarly, key industries such as healthcare and education are publicly owned, ensuring equitable access for all. The democratic governance of these services ensures that economic decisions reflect the needs and desires of the public. -/- 3. Equitable Distribution of Wealth and Resources: The SWBE seeks to eliminate income inequality by redistributing wealth through various mechanisms such as progressive taxation, universal basic income (UBI), and access to free or low-cost public services. A UBI would guarantee that every individual has access to a basic standard of living, freeing people from the pressures of survival in a profit-driven system. This redistribution ensures that wealth is shared more equally, preventing the concentration of resources in the hands of a few. -/- 4. Sustainable Work and Technological Innovation: The SWBE promotes meaningful work that contributes to society, not just economic growth. Automation and AI would be leveraged to reduce the need for manual labor in repetitive tasks, allowing people to engage in more creative and fulfilling roles. This technological innovation would focus on improving quality of life, advancing sustainability, and providing individuals with the freedom to pursue passions and personal development. -/- 5. Global Cooperation and Solidarity: The SWBE encourages global cooperation to address pressing issues such as climate change, resource scarcity, and economic inequality. By fostering international partnerships, countries can collaborate to share knowledge, technology, and resources to meet common goals. Sustainable development would be a global priority, ensuring that all nations, particularly those in the Global South, have the resources they need to thrive. -/- Practical Implementation of the SWBE -/- 1. Business Structure: In the SWBE, businesses would predominantly operate as worker cooperatives, where employees have a say in how the business is run. This system ensures that profits are equitably shared among workers and that decision-making is transparent and democratic. Essential services such as healthcare, education, and transportation would be publicly owned and managed to ensure equal access for all citizens. -/- 2. Public Services: Key services like healthcare, education, housing, and transportation would be provided free or at minimal cost through public ownership. These services would focus on well-being, ensuring that all individuals have access to what they need for a healthy and fulfilling life. This public sector would be heavily supported by progressive taxation, with the wealthiest individuals and corporations contributing more to the common good. -/- 3. Environmental Policies: The SWBE would incorporate strong environmental regulations that ensure businesses reduce waste, minimize carbon emissions, and use sustainable materials. A circular economy model would encourage companies to design products for longevity, repairability, and recyclability. Policies that promote renewable energy, sustainable farming, and eco-friendly manufacturing would be central to the economic model. -/- 4. Transition to a Post-Market System: Over time, the SWBE would transition away from traditional market-based transactions. Advanced technologies such as blockchain could enable direct resource sharing and distribution without the need for monetary exchange. This shift would reduce consumerism, emphasizing shared resources and collaborative production, making it possible for communities to meet their needs without relying on profit-driven incentives. -/- Conclusion -/- The Sustainable Well-Being Economy The Political Economy of Peer Production(SWBE) offers a promising alternative to the profit-driven model of capitalism. By focusing on sustainability, equity, and human well-being, the SWBE strives to create an economic system that balances environmental stewardship with social and economic fairness. Through democratic decision-making, cooperative economics, and a focus on resource efficiency, the SWBE seeks to address the pressing challenges of inequality, environmental degradation, and social exclusion. -/- Although the transition to this new economic system would be complex and require significant global coordination, the SWBE provides a vision of a more equitable, sustainable, and fulfilling future for all. As we move forward into an uncertain economic landscape, the SWBE offers a path toward a more balanced and harmonious world. -/- References -/- 1. Bauwens, M. (2012). The Political Economy of Peer Production. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 475-488. -/- This paper explores the concept of peer-to-peer production and how it can contribute to a new economic paradigm focused on collaboration rather than competition. -/- 2. Buch-Hansen, H., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2018). A Sustainable Well-Being Economy: Building on the Ideas of the Commons, Resource-Based Economy, and Ecological Economics. Journal of Ecological Economics, 86, 255-264. -/- This article discusses how sustainable economic systems can be developed by integrating commons-based resource management and ecological economics. -/- 3. Gorz, A. (2008). The Impossibility of Capitalism: A Social Ecology. Verso Books. -/- Gorz critiques the sustainability of capitalism, providing a foundation for alternative economic models based on ecological and social well-being. -/- 4. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Earthscan. -/- Jackson advocates for an economy that prioritizes sustainability and well-being over GDP growth, a principle foundational to the SWBE. -/- 5. Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. -/- Mason offers an alternative vision of a post-capitalist world, arguing that a post-market economy, based on sustainability and collaboration, is achievable with the right technological and social frameworks. -/- 6. Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan. -/- Rifkin discusses how the digital revolution and collaborative commons are eroding the traditional profit-based model of capitalism, pointing towards a system where collaboration and sustainability take precedence. -/- 7. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press. -/- Sen’s work focuses on human development and well-being, arguing that the economic model should be designed to enhance the capabilities and freedoms of individuals, a key principle in the SWBE framework. -/- 8. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. -/- As the foundational text of capitalism, Smith’s work provides insights into the limitations and contradictions of market-driven economic systems, motivating the search for alternatives such as the SWBE. -/- 9. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W.W. Norton & Company. -/- Stiglitz critiques the growing inequality in capitalist economies and explores the need for a more equitable distribution of wealth, a key aspect of the SWBE. -/- 10. The Transition Network. (2018). The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. Green Books. -/- This work provides a practical guide to creating more resilient and sustainable local economies through cooperative initiatives, which aligns with the cooperative economics and sustainability principles in the SWBE model. -/- 11. Veltmeyer, H., & Petras, J. (2014). The Global Capitalist Crisis and the Crisis of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan. -/- This text examines the global capitalist crisis and explores alternative economic systems, which influence the development of a sustainable, well-being focused model like the SWBE. -/- 12. Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. Verso. -/- Wright presents the idea of real utopias, focusing on possible economic alternatives that would be more democratic and equitable, laying the groundwork for systems like the SWBE. -/- These references collectively build the theoretical and practical foundation for the Sustainable Well-Being Economy (SWBE), providing insights into how we might transition from a profit-driven system to a more equitable, sustainable, and human-centered economic model. -/- . (shrink)

Title: The Universal Balance Economy: A Hybrid Economic Model Guided by Natural Law -/- Author: Angelito Malicse -/- Abstract -/- This paper presents the “Universal Balance Economy” (UBE), a hybrid economic model designed to eliminate the root causes of money-related crimes, corruption, and greed. Grounded in the universal laws of nature—specifically the laws of karma, balance, and feedback—the UBE aims to replace the traditional money-driven economy with a system that promotes equilibrium, sustainability, and ethical contribution. The UBE (...) integrates principles from existing alternative models such as the resource-based economy, gift economy, time-banking, and AGI-assisted coordination. It proposes a framework in which contributions are based on systemic need and personal capacity, while distribution is guided by fairness, transparency, and continuous feedback. -/- 1. Introduction -/- The contemporary global economic system, centered on money, often leads to imbalances in human behavior and societal structures. Crimes, corruption, and greed frequently arise from competition, scarcity, and profit motives. This paper explores the potential for a moneyless economy guided by natural laws, which inherently promote balance, order, and systemic harmony. -/- 2. Theoretical Foundation: The Three Universal Laws -/- The Universal Balance Economy is grounded in the following principles: -/- 2.1 Law of Karma (System Integrity) Every system must operate free of internal defects. Human behavior, technological systems, and societal structures must be designed with precision and harmony to avoid malfunction. 2.2 2.3 Law of Balance (Equilibrium) Every decision must strive to maintain internal and external balance. Excessive accumulation, overconsumption, and neglect of environmental or social feedback result in systemic instability. 2.4 2.3 Law of Feedback (Adaptive Interaction) Decisions and behaviors must continuously adapt based on feedback from internal awareness and the external environment, ensuring growth, sustainability, and responsiveness. -/- 3. Structural Components of the Universal Balance Economy -/- 3.1 Resource Stewardship System (RSS) Resources are communally managed. An advanced sensor and AI infrastructure monitors availability, renewal rates, and ecosystem feedback to ensure sustainability and proper allocation. 3.2 3.3 Contribution Credits (Non-Transactional Records) Instead of monetary compensation, individual contributions are recorded in a transparent, non-competitive system. These credits reflect effort, skill, and alignment with systemic needs, not for accumulation but for reflective feedback. 3.4 3.3 Needs-Based Distribution Network (NBDN) All essential human needs—such as food, water, shelter, healthcare, education, and energy—are distributed freely based on real-time data regarding need, availability, and ecological limits. -/- 3.5 Education for Natural Law (ENL) Holistic education systems are implemented from early childhood to adulthood, emphasizing critical thinking, systems understanding, and moral alignment with natural laws. 3.6 3.5 Feedback and Adaptation Layer (FAL) Real-time feedback mechanisms, both human and AI-assisted, enable constant recalibration of systems and behaviors. This ensures equilibrium in social, environmental, and personal spheres. -/- 4. Prevention of Greed, Corruption, and Crime -/- In the absence of money and private ownership of natural resources, the motivations for corruption and greed are systematically reduced. Transparent systems and holistic education reinforce ethical behavior, while real-time feedback ensures immediate identification and correction of imbalances. Value is redefined not by accumulation but by contribution to the system’s balance. -/- 5. Leadership and Governance -/- Leadership within the UBE operates on a rotational and merit-based model. Leaders are selected based on their knowledge, balanced thinking, and service. All decisions undergo a “Balance Review Protocol” to ensure they align with the universal laws. Artificial intelligence serves as a tool for coordination and decision support, not as a ruler. -/- 6. Conclusion -/- The Universal Balance Economy offers a practical and ethically grounded alternative to monetary capitalism. By aligning economic life with the natural laws of karma, balance, and feedback, the model seeks to cultivate a sustainable, equitable, and corruption-free society. As technology and global awareness evolve, the UBE stands as a visionary framework for a new era of human civilization. -/- . (shrink)

Some sharing economy firms have adopted a strategy of “regulatory entrepreneurship,” openly violating regulations with the aim of rendering them dead letters. This article argues that in a democracy, regulatory entrepreneurship is a presumptively unethical business strategy. In all but the most corrupt political environments, businesses that seek to change their regulatory environment should do so through the democratic political process, and they should do so without using illegal business practices to build a political constituency. To show this, the (...) article defends a qualified moral obligation for businesspeople to obey the law even in societies that fall short of ideal democracy and that are rife with economic injustice. Owners and managers of successful businesses have strong moral reasons to obey laws concerning resource allocation. Such laws include not only property law, but also tax laws, environmental regulations, and other laws that regulate businesses in competitive markets. The moral reasons to obey such laws apply even to laws that business leaders think unfair or inefficient, provided that the laws in question have reasonable, good faith defenders. (shrink)

Many of us assume that all the free editing and sorting of online content we ordinarily rely on is carried out by AI algorithms — not human persons. Yet in fact, that is often not the case. This is because human workers remain cheaper, quicker, and more reliable than AI for performing myriad tasks where the right answer turns on ineffable contextual criteria too subtle for algorithms to yet decode. The output of this work is then used for machine learning (...) purposes to generate algorithms constructed from large data sets containing thousands of correctly coded observations. The fact that ghost workers are treated as consumers distorts the basic logic of the employment relationship, effectively placing the worker-as-consumer in the worst of both worlds, in which they hold the legal rights of neither group. This puts them in a regulatory limbo position in which they have little or no protection, control, or guarantee of return on investment. This is because the platforms that facilitate ghost work have orchestrated a three-way virtual relationship that absolves all parties of responsibility, while placing nearly all the risks and opportunity costs squarely on the shoulders of the workers. As a result, we believe such a work arrangement as it stands, does not uphold basic standards of Rawlsian justice as fairness. (shrink)

Over the last decade, the phenomenon called collaborative economy or sharing economy gained significant dimensions and crossed many sectors of economic and social life, creating new business models. Despite the growing interest, there is no single concept for its definition, manifestations, impacts and business models, while at the same time, digital platforms have allowed its sophisticated development. The seen emergence of sharing economy in Bulgaria brings out the need to study the phenomenon at the national level, its (...) context, development, stakeholders. The aim of this chapter is to shed light on the main manifestations and regulatory issues of the sharing economy in Bulgaria and to discuss its stage of development critically. The first part starts with a review of definition aspects and academic conceptualisation of the sharing economy and key issues. In the second part, aspects of the context and manifestations in the development of the phenomenon are discussed. Then, looking at several national examples of market players, an attempt is made to present the sectoral scope of the sharing economy and its development and to highlight the active stakeholders in the market. The study concludes with a discussion on the policies to be developed at the national level and future research to be carried out in order to catch the potential opportunities and overcome potential barriers. (shrink)

It is fair to say that in contemporary society there is a growing demand amongst consumers for instant gratification and for products and services that can be accessed 24-hours a day. This appears to be the case across numerous sectors of society including (but not limited to) business, education, retail, tourism, health, and recreation. Some examples that come to mind are the: (i) investor looking for a quick-win return on their outlay, (ii) patient demanding a same-day diagnosis and medicine (...) for their latest ailment, (iii) fast-food restaurant goer, (iv) all-inclusive package holiday-maker that can have food, drink, and entertainment any time of day and without having to leave the confines of their hotel, (v) student or professional undertaking an accelerated program of studies or training in order to be awarded the qualification/certificate in the shortest time possible, and (vi) individual using an online dating agency in order to be instantly matched with the “perfect partner”. In addition to the sectors and examples mentioned above, this trend towards wanting immediate reward also appears to be occurring in the spirituality and religion marketplace. For example, one only has to conduct a search on the internet or look at the spiritualty section of a bookshop and it is easy to be overwhelmed by the number of individuals purporting to be spiritual teachers and promising a quick-fix for alleviating suffering. In this post, we examine the benefits and risks of the ‘I want it all, I want it now’ mentality as they relate to the spiritual (and high-street) consumer, and discuss whether it is possible to embody the essence of the Buddha’s teachings whilst living in a “fast-food” society. (shrink)

The theories of Locke, Hume and Kant dominate contemporary philosophical discourse on property rights. This is particularly true of applied ethics, where they are used to settle issues from biotech patents to managerial obligations. Within these theories, however, the usual criticisms of private property aren’t even as much as intelligible. Locke, Hume and Kant, I argue, develop claims about property on a model economy that I call “Frontier Town.” They and contemporary authors then apply these claims to capitalist economies. (...) There are two problems with this application: First, we’ll be considering the wrong kind of property: The only property in Frontier Town are means of life. Critics, however, object to property in concentrated capital because they associate only this kind of property with economic coercion and political power. Second, the two economies differ in central features, so that very different claims about empirical consequences and hence about fairness and merit will be plausible for each. This second problem, I argue, is a consequence of the first. I conclude that Frontier Town theories are more likely to distort than to illuminate property issues in capitalist economies. (shrink)

-/- Title: A Practical Model for a Resource-Based Economy Guided by Natural Laws -/- Author: Angelito Malicse -/- Introduction -/- The current global economic system, primarily based on money, has long contributed to inequality, ecological degradation, and systemic inefficiencies. These problems persist because the system itself is not aligned with the natural laws that govern sustainable life on Earth. This essay proposes a practical model for a Resource-Based Economy (RBE), grounded in a universal formula based on the law (...) of balance in nature, the law of karma as system integrity, and continuous feedback mechanisms. This model is not theoretical; it is designed for real-world implementation in a small country or prototype community. -/- The Foundation: Universal Natural Laws -/- The universal formula guiding this RBE model is built upon three essential laws: -/- 1. Law of Balance in Nature – All decision-making must maintain equilibrium between internal human needs and external environmental realities. Any decision that violates this balance results in systemic breakdowns. -/- 2. Law of Karma as System Integrity – Every system, whether mechanical or social, must be free from internal defects and contradictions. An economic system must operate with the same integrity as a finely-tuned engine or a healthy human body. -/- 3. Law of Feedback Mechanism – Decision-making must continuously adapt based on real-time feedback from the environment and from the conscious interactions between individuals and systems. -/- Together, these laws form the ethical and operational basis of a Resource-Based Economy that transcends the limitations of traditional monetary systems. -/- Structural Components of the RBE Prototype -/- 1. Resource Survey and Management System -/- A full inventory of natural resources, human skills, technologies, and infrastructure is conducted. Resources are classified into renewable, non-renewable, and recyclable categories. Advanced sensors and artificial intelligence (AI) track real-time data such as agricultural output, energy use, and water supply. This data-driven system enables scientifically grounded decisions that support environmental and societal balance. -/- 2. Needs-Based Distribution -/- Instead of pricing goods and services through a currency system, distribution is based on actual human needs. A digital platform enables individuals to request what they require—food, clothing, shelter, healthcare—without exchanging money. AI logistics systems ensure efficient, fair, and sustainable delivery of goods and services. -/- 3. Contribution System Based on Time and Value -/- Community members contribute to the system not through monetary labor but through time, skills, and value. Contributions include farming, teaching, maintenance, design, caregiving, and more. AI optimizes labor distribution to prevent overwork and to match individuals with meaningful tasks that align with both personal fulfillment and societal needs. -/- 4. Education and Decision-Making System -/- Education is restructured to emphasize critical thinking, systems understanding, and natural laws. From early education to adulthood, individuals are taught the ethical and ecological foundations of decision-making. Community decisions are made through open deliberation, guided by data, transparent reasoning, and the universal formula. Leaders function as coordinators rather than authoritarian figures. -/- 5. Technology as the Nervous System of the Economy -/- Advanced technologies such as AI, sensors, and real-time data analytics form the nervous system of the economy. These technologies: -/- Monitor the flow of resources -/- Track environmental impact -/- Assess the needs and well-being of individuals -/- Identify imbalances and suggest corrections -/- Technology enables proactive governance, reduces human error, and ensures transparency and accountability throughout the system. -/- Pilot Implementation and Location Considerations -/- A suitable location for the first RBE prototype could be a small island, rural town, or autonomous eco-village. Criteria for selection include: -/- Willingness of local population to shift away from traditional money systems -/- Availability of basic infrastructure -/- Support from academic institutions and sustainability organizations -/- Initial funding would be required for infrastructure development, sensor networks, and education programs. However, once operational, the system becomes self-sustaining by eliminating economic waste, inefficiency, and social inequality. -/- Benefits and Problem Solving Capacity -/- The RBE model solves major societal problems as follows: -/- Conclusion -/- The Resource-Based Economy proposed in this essay offers a practical, ethical, and scientific alternative to current money-driven systems. By aligning economic structure with the universal laws of balance, system integrity, and feedback, society can evolve beyond artificial scarcity, competition, and exploitation. Implementing this model on a small scale can serve as a blueprint for future communities and nations seeking sustainable and just systems. -/- Bibliography -/- Fresco, J. (2007). The Best That Money Can’t Buy: Beyond Politics, Poverty & War. Global Cyber-Visions. -/- Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing. -/- Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing. -/- Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling Society. Marion Boyars. -/- Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Johns Hopkins Press. -/- Malicse, A. (2024). The Universal Formula: Solving the Problem of Free Will through Natural Laws. [Unpublished manuscript]. -/- . (shrink)

Élie HALÉVY (1870-1937), philosophe et historien des idées, fut professeur à l'École libre des sciences politiques, l'ancêtre de l'actuel Sciences Po. Comme son autre grand ouvrage, l'Histoire du peuple anglais au XIXe siècle, paru en six tomes de 1913 à 1932, les trois tomes de La formation du radicalisme philosophique, parus en 1901 pour les deux premiers et en 1904 pour le troisième, reflètent pour partie ses enseignements de l'Ecole libre consacrés à l'histoire britannique. Le premier tome, La jeunesse de (...) Bentham 1776-1789, étudie la doctrine utilitariste non seulement chez celui qu'on regarde comme son fondateur principal, Jeremy Bentham, mais aussi chez les nombreux auteurs qui, en Grande-Bretagne et sur le continent, en dessinèrent avant lui les contours. Le deuxième tome, L’évolution de la doctrine utilitaire de 1789 à 1815, montre comment l'utilitarisme revêtit la forme non seulement d'une école de pensée, mais aussi d'un mouvement pour la réforme économique, sociale et politique. Le rôle coordonnateur nouveau de James Mill, ainsi qu'une convergence de vues avec les économistes, qui poussaient dans le sens des réformes, marquèrent notamment cette évolution. Le troisième tome, Le radicalisme philosophique, continue d'étudier la transformation de l'école en mouvement après la fin des guerres napoléoniennes, lorsque celle-ci commence à engranger ses premiers grands succès réformistes. Bentham, James Mill et les autres penseurs utilitaires sont alors réunis sous l'appellation de philosophic radicals. Le terme temporel de l'ouvrage est le Reform Act de 1832, première étape vers la modernisation du système électoral, que la propagande de ce groupe ne contribua pas peu à faire aboutir. Quoique l'ouvrage d'Halévy vaille en premier lieu par l'immense savoir qu'il déploie, et le nombre et l'excellence des citations qu'il propose, il comporte aussi des thèses historiques et philosophiques originales. On peut citer parmi les premières la thèse, qui relie les trois tomes, voulant que l'utilitarisme britannique trouve sa forme achevée dans l'intervention sur la société, lorsqu'il se mue en radicalisme philosophique, et parmi les secondes, la thèse, énoncée au début du premier tome, voulant qu'il existe trois modèles dominants de jonction des intérêts individuels (la fusion sympathique, l'identification naturelle et l'identification artificielle). Une autre grande thèse, à la fois historique et philosophique, affirme en substance que l'économie politique classique serait un département spécialisé de la pensée utilitaire. La question de savoir jusqu'à quel point Smith, Ricardo et Malthus ont pu adhérer au "principe d'utilité" de Bentham est toujours débattue. En même temps que les élucidations apportées à ce principe, elle contribue à expliquer l'intérêt que les historiens de la pensée économique continuent de porter à l'ouvrage. L'auteur a participé à la réédition de La formation du radicalisme philosophique en 1995 par les Presses Universitaires de France (P.U.F.), suivant un projet collectif lancé par Monique Canto-Sperber. Dans le présent article, antérieur à cette réédition, l'auteur tentait de résumer brièvement un livre qui demeure irremplaçable en dépit d'une conception et d'un style quelque peu datés. (shrink)

Title: A Model for a Moneyless Digital Economy Using Contribution-Based Digital Credits -/- Abstract: This paper proposes a conceptual framework for a moneyless digital economy system (MDES) that uses non-tradable contribution credits instead of traditional currency. Rooted in the principles of equitable access, contribution-driven participation, and sustainability, this model outlines the structure and functioning of a community-oriented, AI-assisted economy. The system ensures basic needs are universally guaranteed, while elective resources are accessed through earned credits based on meaningful (...) contribution. The model is illustrated through a community simulation and supported by technological and social mechanisms. -/- 1. Introduction The current global economic system, largely driven by capital accumulation and monetary transactions, often fails to equitably distribute resources or prioritize collective well-being. In contrast, a moneyless digital economy offers an alternative paradigm that emphasizes shared access, contribution, and sustainability. This paper presents a formal model for implementing such a system using digital technologies and community governance mechanisms. -/- 2. Core Principles -/- Access-Based Economy: Resources are accessed based on need and contribution, not purchased. -/- Contribution-Driven Credit System: Digital credits are awarded for contributions to the community but are not used for wealth accumulation. -/- Equal Human Value: All individuals are treated equally, and credits do not confer social or economic status. -/- AI-Assisted Fairness: Artificial intelligence supports equitable resource distribution and conflict resolution. -/- 3. System Components -/- 3.1 Digital Identity Each participant is issued a secure digital identity. This identity is used to track contributions, resource usage, and preferences, while ensuring privacy and security. 3.2 3.3 Contribution Credit System (CCS) Contribution credits (CCs) are non-transferable digital units earned through volunteer work, service, education, innovation, and caregiving. These credits are temporary and expire to prevent hoarding. 3.4 3.3 Access Management System Resources are categorized as guaranteed or elective. Guaranteed resources (e.g., food, housing, healthcare) are freely accessible. Elective resources require a small number of CCs and are managed by a fair allocation algorithm. -/- 3.5 AI & Community Governance An AI system manages logistics, optimizes task distribution, and ensures resource availability. Community governance bodies provide oversight and facilitate democratic decision-making. 3.6 3.5 Basic Needs Guarantee Universal access to food, shelter, healthcare, education, and digital tools is ensured without requiring credits. -/- 4. Simulation: Harmony Village A prototype implementation of MDES is simulated in a fictional community, Harmony Village, with 1,000 residents. -/- Roles & Contributions: Participants fulfill roles in health, education, infrastructure, technology, agriculture, and arts, earning between 2 and 4 CCs daily based on effort and community impact. -/- Resource Access: Basic needs are universally accessible. Elective resources (e.g., virtual reality labs, travel, private workspace) require CCs. AI systems ensure fair scheduling and availability. -/- Daily Operations: AI assigns tasks based on skills and interests. Contribution logs are updated in real-time. Community forums allow feedback and policy updates. -/- Weekly Flow Example: A typical resident, Layla, earns CCs through arts education and gardening. She uses credits to access creative tools and participate in cultural activities. Her contributions and access are balanced, transparent, and reviewed weekly by the system. -/- 5. Implementation Requirements -/- Reliable digital infrastructure (internet, secure identity verification) -/- Renewable energy and sustainable local production -/- Transparent and auditable AI governance -/- Holistic education promoting responsibility, empathy, and critical thinking -/- Community-led adaptation and governance mechanisms -/- 6. Conclusion The MDES model offers a viable framework for transitioning to a post-monetary economy focused on equity, sustainability, and human dignity. With the integration of digital identity, contribution tracking, and AI-assisted management, societies can reimagine access and participation beyond conventional monetary constraints. -/- Future research may include real-world pilot programs, development of decentralized digital infrastructure, and sociological studies of community adaptation to non-monetary systems. -/- . (shrink)

The Risks of High Birth Rates in Poor Countries Without a Government-Managed Economy -/- In many poor countries, having a large number of children is often seen as a way to secure a family’s future. However, in modern economies where job creation depends primarily on private companies and startups, this strategy becomes highly unsustainable. Without a socialist system managed by the government and its central bank to stabilize employment and provide essential services, rapid population growth can lead to widespread (...) economic and social challenges. -/- The Uncertainty of Private-Sector Job Creation -/- One of the main reasons why having many children in poor countries is not advisable is that job creation relies heavily on private companies and startups, which are highly unstable. Unlike government-managed industries that prioritize long-term economic stability, private companies operate for profit and are subject to market fluctuations. Many businesses, especially startups, fail within a few years, leading to job losses and financial insecurity for workers. Without a strong state intervention to ensure employment stability, large families may struggle to provide for their children. -/- Furthermore, economic recessions can cause mass layoffs, leaving entire families without a source of income. Poor countries often lack sufficient unemployment benefits or social safety nets, making it difficult for parents to support a growing number of children in times of economic downturn. -/- Lack of Government-Controlled Economic Planning -/- In socialist systems, the government and its central bank play a key role in managing the economy by controlling industries, regulating employment, and ensuring economic stability. In contrast, market-driven economies in poor countries often experience economic cycles of booms and busts. During economic downturns, private companies reduce hiring, and job scarcity worsens. -/- Without a government-planned economy, employment opportunities remain unpredictable, making it difficult for large families to secure a stable income. Governments in poor countries typically lack the resources to create enough public-sector jobs, leaving citizens at the mercy of volatile private-sector employment. -/- Strain on Public Services -/- A rapidly growing population increases the demand for essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Poor countries often lack the financial resources to expand these services quickly enough to match population growth. As a result, schools become overcrowded, healthcare facilities are overburdened, and infrastructure development lags behind, leading to lower living standards. -/- Without a strong government-backed socialist system to manage resources efficiently, families with many children face limited access to quality education and healthcare. This creates a cycle of poverty, where children grow up without proper education and skills, reducing their chances of securing stable jobs in the future. -/- Wage Suppression and Exploitation of Labor -/- When population growth outpaces job creation, the labor market becomes oversaturated, leading to lower wages. In economies dominated by private companies, employers take advantage of surplus labor to keep wages low. This makes it difficult for large families to earn enough income to support their basic needs. -/- In contrast, a government-managed economy could regulate wages and ensure fair labor conditions, preventing the exploitation of workers. Without such regulations, families in poor countries face the risk of being trapped in a cycle of low wages and poor working conditions, making it increasingly difficult to escape poverty. -/- The Risks of Entrepreneurial Dependence -/- While entrepreneurship is often promoted as a solution to job shortages, startups and small businesses are highly risky, especially in poor countries where access to capital is limited. Many aspiring entrepreneurs lack the financial resources, technical skills, and market access to sustain successful businesses. Without government-backed support, such as low-interest loans, subsidies, or public sector employment, relying on entrepreneurship for job creation remains an uncertain strategy. -/- Conclusion -/- In countries without a socialist system where the government actively manages economic stability and employment, having many children can lead to significant economic and social challenges. The reliance on private companies and startups for job creation is highly risky due to market fluctuations, limited public services, suppressed wages, and the difficulties of entrepreneurship. Without strong government intervention to regulate employment and provide social support, large families in poor countries face higher risks of poverty and economic instability. -/- To ensure a sustainable future, poor countries should focus on balancing population growth with economic development. This requires investment in education, healthcare, and employment programs that provide stable opportunities for all citizens. Without such measures, uncontrolled population growth in market-driven economies will only deepen poverty and inequality. -/- . (shrink)

This article develops a diagnostic lens to make sense of the still baffling development of a ‘humanitarian marketplace’. Ambivalently hybrid initiatives such as volunteer tourism, corporate social responsibility or even fair trade do not strictly obey a distributive logic of market exchange, social reciprocity or philanthropic giving. They engender a type of ‘economy’ that must be apprehended in its own terms. The article argues that the large-scale collaborative effects of such a dispersed market can be theorized without resorting (...) to the classical biopolitical move of simplified agency/holistic reification. The argument proceeds counterintuitively, by appropriating the notion of symbiosis as redefined by contemporary biology, contending through historical contextualization and conceptual work that nature itself offers the best example to grasp spontaneous collaboration among unrelated human beings as a non-automatically balanced and intrinsically political affair that calls for critical management through an ex post facto interventionist policy of selective cultivation. (shrink)

Honors Research: PPE @ UPenn | This thesis seeks to address some of the most central questions to the fields of political philosophy and political economy. How can social order and government develop from anarchy under standard economic assumptions of rationality, where all agents act strictly in their own interests? What are the deontological limits to the State’s use of force such that political legitimacy is maintained, and how do these ethical boundaries of government relate to moral obligations conferred (...) upon individuals? Finally, what sets of policies and social institutions ought the State implement to achieve the best welfare outcomes for a society, and is there a necessary conflict between policy consequentialism and deontological ethics? This thesis will first show that a laissez-faire capitalist social order spontaneously emerges from the State of Nature as a result of mutual self-interest between rational agents, with the institution of government being a mere product of market forces that is best modeled as a locally-monopolized, excludable, collective entity with global competition. Then, this thesis will defend a theory of natural rights on the basis that persons are normatively separate, before establishing that laissez-faire capitalism and its contractual form of government are uniquely in compliance with these universal moral standards of conduct that predate the institution of any state. Finally, it will be argued in this thesis that the key tenets of laissez-faire capitalism - strong individual rights to life, liberty, and property - produce maximal human welfare from both individualist and collectivist aggregations, before such conclusions are translated into a foundation for limited government. These arguments serve to solidify libertarianism as both the dominant political philosophy and the globally convergent equilibrium of political organization, while also demonstrating that laissez-faire capitalism is the optimal form of social order. (shrink)

This publication forms a basis for the interdisciplinary development of a certification system for artificial intelligence. In view of the rapid development of artificial intelligence with disruptive and lasting consequences for the economy, society, and everyday life, it highlights the resulting challenges that can be tackled only through interdisciplinary dialogue between IT, law, philosophy, and ethics. As a result of this interdisciplinary exchange, it also defines six AI-specific audit areas for trustworthy use of artificial intelligence. They comprise fairness, transparency, (...) autonomy and control, data protection as well as security and reliability while addressing ethical and legal requirements. The latter are further substantiated with the aim of operationalizability. (shrink)

Social entrepreneurship is usually understood as an economic activity which focuses at social values, goals, and investments that generates surpluses for social entrepreneurs as individuals, groups, and startups who are working for the benefit of communities, instead of strictly focusing mainly at the financial profit, economic values, and the benefit generated for shareholders or owners. Social entrepreneurship combines the production of goods, services, and knowledge in order to achieve both social and economic goals and allow for solidarity building. From a (...) broader perspective, entities that are focused on social entrepreneurship are identified as parts of the social and solidarity economy. These are, for example, social enterprises, cooperatives, mutual organizations, self-help groups, charities, unions, fair trade companies, community enterprises, and time banks. Social innovation is a key element of social entrepreneurship. Social innovation is usually understood as new strategies, concepts, products, services, and organizational forms that allow for the satisfaction of needs. Such innovations are created in particular in the contact areas of various sectors of the social system. For example, these are spaces between the public sector, the private sector, and civil society. These innovations not only allow the solving of problems but also extend possibilities for public action. (shrink)

We address the most fundamental yet routinely ignored issue in economics today: that of distributive impact of the monetary system on the real economy. By re-examining the logical implications of token re-presentation of value and Irving Fisher’s theory of exchange, we argue that producers of value incur incidental expropriation of wealth associated with the deflationary effect that new value supply has on the purchasing power of money. In order to remedy the alleged inequity we propose a value-added negative tax (...) (VANT) based on net individual contribution to the economic output, which is structured as a negative tax function geared to profits derived from eligible productive activities in consideration of their estimated deflationary impact. We show that an adequately optimised VANT can be non-inflationary and have zero net cost to the public. Furthermore, economic output stands to improve due to direct incentivisation of value creation, making the proposed scheme not only politically feasible but economically desirable. The proposal advances the principle of ‘fair money’, where all forms of economic value are attributed to their rightful owners prior to any positive taxation. (shrink)

W.E.B. Du Bois’s socialism has provoked debate for decades. His democratic theory and critique of political economy supports democratic socialism. In this article, I offer a philosophical reconstruction of the normative foundation of his democratic socialism in three steps. First, I argue that his philosophy of the modern democratic state supports the people’s advance of the principle of free and equal citizenship or civic equality. Next, I present his critique of the modern American welfare state, which asserts the (...) class='Hi'>fair value of political liberty and democratic control over productive activities. Finally, I introduce the method of the excluded groups from Darkwater as an ideal procedure for guiding democratic deliberation in a profoundly nonideal public sphere. The method foregrounds the voices of excluded groups to correct asymmetrical relations of practical power and to infuse democratic reason with practical intelligence, namely, new content and values that can lead to the development of a democratic socialist state. (shrink)

The choices we make in our daily lives have consequences that span the oceans: many consumers are not aware that some of the most exotic foods which belong to our breakfast plates every single day, such as coffee or chocolate, have a profound impact on the lives of many people. In Western societies, we are used to eating and consuming fresh ingredients which sprout on a different continent, yet we are unable to see the very hands that carry a simple (...) thing as a banana to our tables, as a consequence of a global supply chain. This alienation from the places and people involved in the supply chain leads consumers to ignore the impact of producing some foods and enabling them to travel all the way to one’s table. What is regarded as a simple commodity, in fact, is a result of the labour and exploitation of many families and crops on the other side of the ocean. Modern slavery comes in many guises and is often obscured by the alienation of modern consumers from their products, an example of which includes the slave system that holds many people tied behind our food chains. As consumers, we unconsciously become commissioners of a system of inequality and exploitation which we ignore. This includes many ‘fair-trade’ certified products, which are employed by multinationals as a psychological marketing tactic. This phenomenon is described by the cultural anthropologist Richard Robbins (2013) as the ‘commodification of morality’, where even commitments to just, fair or sustainable practices have been monopolised by economic agents. Within this framework, our moral choices are put on the market with a price which rarely returns or reflects the true cost of such products. This article begins by defining modern slavery, proceeding with a particular focus on forced labour in the current neoliberal regime. This is then contextualised in the case study of bananas as one of the most consumed, yet furthest grown, items of Western diets. The article then analyses the ethical backdrop of economic practices, using the fair-trade movement as a synecdoche of the moral economy of our day. The main question raised within this analysis is to what extent our moral choices can contribute to exploitation or to social change, and how our way of eating can oppose the great inequalities that still exist in the present context. (shrink)

In the popular and academic literature on the problems of the so-called attention economy, the cost of attention grabbing, sustaining, and immersing digital medias has been addressed as if it touched all people equally. In this paper I ask whether everyone has the same resources to respond to the recent changes in their stimulus environments caused by the attention economy. I argue that there are not only differences but disparities between people in their responses to the recent, significant (...) increase in the degree and persuasiveness of digital distraction. I point toward individual variance in an agent’s top-down and bottom-up attention regulation, and to further inequality-exacerbating variance in active participation on the internet and in regulating reward-seeking behaviors on the internet. Individual differences in these areas amount to disparities because they have been found to be connected to socioeconomic background factors. I argue that disparities in responding to digital distraction threaten fair equality of opportunity when it comes to digital distraction in the classroom and that they may lead to an unequal contribution of achievements that require complex cognition by people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. (shrink)

Due to weak economies or ill-adapted public policies aggravated by the pandemic, official services dedicated to the unconditional reception and support of people in psychosocial distress in large urban areas are often put to the test. Here is the approach of the action research “Evolution after COVid-19 of the Invisibility of Precarities” (ECOVIP) dedicated to this phenomenon, as well as its first results concerning the precarity of unemployed “young” seniors (50-64 years old) in Lyon, France. This participative research is based (...) on workshops that bring together professionals from both the front-line psychosocial field and other fields such as employment or work, and in which they are offered a free expression of their lived situations of reception of precarious people. The first results provided by the scientific and transparent analysis of these exchanges show both a fairly precise understanding of the institutional decision leading to increasing invisibility, and the emergence of innovative professional resources capable of curbing it. (shrink)

What does social justice require in contemporary societies? What are the requirements of social democracy? Who and where are the individuals and groups that can carry forward agendas for progressive social transformation? What are we to make of the so-called new social movements of the last thirty years? Is identity politics compatible with egalitarianism? Can cultural misrecognition and economic maldistribution be fought simultaneously? What of the heritage of Western Marxism is alive and dead? And how is current critical social theory (...) to approach these and other questions? Much of the most productive work done in recent social theory has revolved around such issues, in particular, around those concerning the relationship between the politics of recognition and the politics of distribution. After the intense theoretical focus over the last fifteen years or so on the issues of recognition politics—multiculturalism, multi-nationalism, identity politics, group-differentiated rights, the accommodation of difference, and so on—some social theorists have worried that attention has been diverted from important issues of distributive equality—systematic impoverishment, increasing material inequality, ‘structural’ unemployment, the growth of oligarchic power, global economic segmentation, and so on. While some critics seem to have adopted a blunt ‘it’s the economy, stupid’ line of criticism,1 others have attempted to develop an overarching, integrative theoretical framework adequate to the diverse issues concerning both economic and cultural justice. For example, Axel Honneth proposes that a suitably developed and normatively robust theory of intersubjective recognition can adequately integrate an analysis of apparently diverse contemporary struggles: those for a just division of labor and hence, a fair distribution of resources and opportunities, as well as those for a culture free of identity-deforming disrespect and denigration. (shrink)

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the extent to which economies in the developed and developing world rely on gig workers to perform essential tasks such as health care, personal transport, food and package delivery, and ad hoc tasking services. As a result, workers who provide such services are no longer perceived as mere low-skilled laborers, but as essential workers who fulfill a crucial role in society. The newly elevated moral and economic status of these workers increases consumer demand for corporate (...) social responsibility regarding this stakeholder group – specifically for practices that increase worker freedom and rewards. We provide algorithmic tools for online labor platforms to meet this demand, thereby bolstering their social purpose and ethical branding while better protecting themselves from future reputational crises. To do so, we advance a managerial strategy rooted in moral self-awareness theory in order to leverage customers’ virtuous self-perception and increase gig-worker freedom. (shrink)

Customer ratings and reviews are playing a key role in the contemporary platform economy. To establish trust among stran- gers without having to directly monitor platform users themselves, companies ask people to evaluate each other. Firms like Uber, Deliveroo, or Airbnb construct digital reputation scores by combining these consumer data with their own information from the algorithmic surveillance of workers. Trustworthy behavior is subsequently rewarded with a good reputation score and higher potential earnings, while untrustworthy behavior can be algorithmically (...) penalized. However, can these technolo- gies themselves be trusted? Are they reliable communicators of trustworthy market behavior and do they fairly distribute the benefits and burdens of the online economy among platform companies, consumers, and workers? The implementation of Digital Reputation Systems (DRSs) has obvious advantages, like reducing adjudication costs and enhancing consumer trust, but there are also disadvantages that are predominantly offloaded on workers. Taking Airbnb’s DRS as my case study, I use Stephan Lessenich’s theory of the externalization society to argue that DRSs concentrate the benefits of the platform economy among consumers and platform companies while pushing negative externalities mostly unto workers. (shrink)

Is drastic action against global warming essential to avoid impoverishing our descendants? Or does it mean robbing the poor to give to the rich? We do not yet know. Yet most of us can agree on the importance of minimising expected deprivation. Because of the vast number of future generations, if there is any significant risk of catastrophe, this implies drastic and expensive carbon abatement unless we discount the future. I argue that we should not discount. Instead, the rich countries (...) should stump up the funds to support abatement both for themselves and the poor states of the world. Yet to ask the present generation to assume all the costs of drastic mitigation.is unfair.Worse still, it is politically unrealistic.We can square the circle by shifting part of the burden to our descendants. Even if we divert investment from other parts of the economy or increase public debt, future people should be richer, so long as we avert catastrophe. If so, it is fair for them to assume much of the cost of abatement.What we must not do is to expose them to the threat of disaster by not doing enough. (shrink)

Why It’s Difficult to Increase Job Creation to Balance Exponential Population Growth -/- One of the biggest challenges in economic development is ensuring that job creation keeps pace with the rapid growth of the population. If a country fails to provide enough employment opportunities, it leads to rising unemployment, poverty, and social instability. The problem is even more complex because economic growth is not always proportional to population growth. Several key factors—such as economic productivity, income inequality, technological advancements, education, and (...) labor migration—must be considered when addressing this issue. To create a sustainable balance, countries must focus on maintaining an ideal standard of living, fair income distribution, and a population growth rate that does not exceed economic expansion. -/- 1. The Importance of GDP per Capita in Job Creation -/- A country’s economic strength is often measured by its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, which reflects the average income per person. For a nation to provide enough well-paying jobs, it must have a high enough GDP per capita to support businesses, investments, and infrastructure development. Studies suggest that a GDP per capita of at least $15,000 to $25,000 is necessary for a stable middle-income economy where job opportunities are abundant. -/- However, many developing nations struggle to reach this level due to factors such as inefficient economic policies, corruption, or lack of industrial growth. If GDP per capita is too low, businesses may not generate enough revenue to expand, and workers may be forced into low-wage or informal jobs with little security. To ensure sufficient employment opportunities, governments must focus on improving productivity, supporting small and medium enterprises, and investing in industries that create large numbers of jobs. -/- 2. The Impact of Income Inequality on Job Availability -/- Even if a country has a high GDP, the way wealth is distributed among the population significantly affects job creation. A measure called the Gini coefficient helps determine how equally wealth is shared. If income is too concentrated in the hands of a few, economic growth will not translate into widespread job creation. -/- For a healthy economy, income inequality should be kept within a manageable range—typically a Gini coefficient of 0.25 to 0.35. If this number rises above 0.4, it indicates that a small portion of the population holds most of the wealth, while the majority struggle with low wages and unemployment. High inequality leads to reduced consumer spending, which negatively affects businesses and slows down job creation. To fix this, governments must implement policies that promote fair wages, progressive taxation, and better access to education and healthcare. -/- 3. The Balance Between Population Growth and Economic Growth -/- One of the most critical factors in job creation is the relationship between population growth and economic growth. If the population expands too quickly without a corresponding increase in job opportunities, unemployment will rise. A sustainable population growth rate should generally be below 1% per year, while economic growth should ideally be between 3% and 5% per year to generate enough jobs. -/- In many developing countries, high birth rates continue to add millions of people to the workforce every year, but the economy does not grow fast enough to accommodate them. This problem is worsened by factors such as automation, which replaces traditional jobs, and weak labor markets that fail to absorb new workers. To address this issue, governments must implement population policies, invest in education, and ensure that job market demands align with workforce skills. -/- 4. The Role of Labor Migration in Balancing Job Creation and Population Growth -/- One effective way to address job shortages and overpopulation is through labor migration. Many developed countries face declining birth rates and aging populations, which create labor shortages in critical industries such as healthcare, construction, and agriculture. At the same time, overpopulated developing nations struggle with high unemployment. A well-managed labor migration system can help balance both issues by matching surplus labor from developing countries with job shortages in developed economies. -/- How Labor Migration Helps Solve the Imbalance: -/- For overpopulated countries: Migration reduces unemployment, eases pressure on local job markets, and allows workers to send remittances back home, boosting their domestic economy. -/- For labor-shortage countries: Migrant workers fill essential jobs that local populations are unable or unwilling to do, preventing economic stagnation. -/- Challenges in Implementing Labor Migration: -/- Despite its benefits, labor migration is often restricted by strict immigration policies, cultural resistance, and concerns about local job competition. To maximize the benefits of migration, countries should: -/- Create bilateral agreements that ensure fair wages and worker protections. -/- Provide legal pathways for migrant workers to prevent exploitation and illegal migration. -/- Implement integration programs that help migrants contribute positively to their host economies. -/- By effectively managing labor migration, both sending and receiving countries can create a win-win situation that helps balance employment opportunities globally. -/- 5. The Role of Education and Skills Development -/- A well-educated workforce is essential for job creation. Many emerging industries—such as technology, renewable energy, and healthcare—require specialized skills that the general population may not have. Unfortunately, many education systems fail to prepare students for the jobs of the future, resulting in a mismatch between the skills available in the workforce and the jobs that need to be filled. -/- To solve this, countries must focus on improving education and vocational training programs. Investing in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, as well as technical and trade schools, can help workers adapt to changing job market demands. Additionally, lifelong learning programs should be encouraged to help workers update their skills as industries evolve. -/- 6. How Technology and Globalization Affect Job Creation -/- Advancements in technology and globalization have created both opportunities and challenges for job creation. Automation, artificial intelligence, and robotics have increased productivity but have also eliminated many traditional jobs, particularly in manufacturing and retail. While technology generates new industries, these jobs often require advanced skills, leaving behind workers who are unable to adapt. -/- Similarly, globalization has allowed companies to move jobs to countries with cheaper labor costs, which can reduce employment opportunities in some regions. To counter this, countries must focus on attracting industries that balance automation with human labor, promoting entrepreneurship, and investing in sectors that cannot be easily outsourced, such as local services and infrastructure development. -/- 7. Policy Recommendations for Sustainable Job Creation -/- To ensure that job creation keeps up with population growth, governments and businesses must work together to implement sustainable economic policies. Some key recommendations include: -/- Economic Diversification: Countries should invest in multiple industries, including technology, agriculture, healthcare, and renewable energy, to create a variety of job opportunities. -/- Fair Income Distribution: Policies should be designed to reduce income inequality through progressive taxation, minimum wage laws, and social welfare programs. -/- Education and Workforce Training: Schools and universities should align their curricula with the needs of the job market, and vocational training should be expanded. -/- Population Management: Governments should promote responsible family planning and ensure that population growth does not outpace economic development. -/- Support for Small Businesses: Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are a major source of employment and should receive incentives such as low-interest loans, tax breaks, and reduced bureaucratic barriers. -/- Managed Labor Migration: Countries should develop legal migration pathways that match labor demand and supply globally. -/- Conclusion -/- Balancing job creation with population growth is a complex challenge that requires a comprehensive and sustainable approach. Countries must ensure that GDP per capita remains high, income is distributed fairly, and population growth stays within manageable limits. By investing in education, economic diversification, labor migration, and social policies, governments can create a stable and prosperous society where job opportunities are available for all. If these factors are not properly managed, the gap between population growth and job availability will continue to widen, leading to economic and social instability. -/- . (shrink)

Why Capitalism Cannot Create More Successful Entrepreneurs to Balance Stable Job Creation Amid Increasing Population Growth -/- Introduction -/- Capitalism is often praised for fostering entrepreneurship, economic growth, and job creation. However, its inherent flaws—such as wealth concentration, monopolization, financial barriers, and wage suppression—prevent it from producing enough successful entrepreneurs to balance job creation with increasing population growth. As the global population expands, capitalism alone fails to generate sufficient employment opportunities, leading to economic instability, poverty, and inequality. -/- To address (...) these challenges, a balanced approach involving government intervention, socialist-inspired policies, population regulation, and a coordinated effort between private and public sector job creation is necessary. By ensuring economic stability, providing social safety nets, and aligning workforce growth with sustainable employment opportunities, societies can mitigate capitalism’s failures while maintaining its productive aspects. -/- 1. The Fundamental Flaws of Capitalism in Job Creation -/- While capitalism promotes competition and innovation, it also creates significant economic imbalances: -/- Wealth Concentration and Inequality: Over time, wealth accumulates among a few individuals and corporations, reducing opportunities for new entrepreneurs and limiting social mobility. -/- Monopolization: Large corporations dominate markets, pushing out small businesses and reducing job diversity. -/- Financial Barriers to Entrepreneurship: The cost of starting and sustaining a business is high, making it difficult for new entrepreneurs to compete. -/- Short-Term Profit Maximization: Companies prioritize short-term gains, often outsourcing jobs or automating processes to cut costs, rather than investing in long-term job creation. -/- Cyclical Economic Crises: Capitalist economies experience frequent recessions, leading to mass layoffs, business failures, and financial insecurity. -/- These issues make capitalism insufficient in creating enough businesses and stable jobs to match population growth. -/- 2. The Difficulty of Starting a Business and Its Impact on Job Creation -/- Despite the belief that anyone can succeed through hard work, starting a business remains a significant challenge due to: -/- High Initial Costs: Rent, inventory, equipment, and salaries require substantial capital. -/- Limited Access to Credit: Most banks and investors require collateral or proven profitability, which new entrepreneurs lack. -/- Complex Regulations: Navigating legal and tax systems is expensive and time-consuming. -/- Intense Market Competition: Large corporations benefit from economies of scale, making survival difficult for small businesses. -/- Due to these challenges, most aspiring entrepreneurs fail or remain in precarious financial positions, reducing their ability to contribute to long-term job creation. -/- 3. The Effect of Low Wages on Consumer Buying Power and Job Stability -/- One of capitalism’s biggest contradictions is its reliance on low wages to maximize corporate profits while simultaneously needing strong consumer demand to sustain business growth. -/- Reduced Consumer Demand: When workers earn low wages, they have less money to spend, weakening economic growth. -/- Increased Debt and Financial Instability: Many workers rely on credit for basic needs, making them financially vulnerable. -/- Job Insecurity and Precarious Work: Companies cut costs by hiring temporary workers or outsourcing jobs, leading to job instability. -/- By failing to pay workers a living wage, capitalism limits its own potential for sustainable economic growth, reinforcing inequality and restricting business expansion. -/- 4. Balancing Job Creation Between the Private and Public Sectors -/- To counteract capitalism’s job creation failures, a balanced approach that combines private sector entrepreneurship and government-led job creation is essential. -/- A. Private Sector Job Creation -/- The private sector should remain a driving force of economic innovation and employment, but it must be regulated to prevent exploitative practices. Governments can support private-sector job creation by: -/- Providing Financial Assistance to Startups: Low-interest loans and grants can help small businesses grow. -/- Ensuring Fair Competition: Antitrust laws prevent monopolies from dominating industries. -/- Raising Minimum Wages: Ensuring fair wages strengthens consumer spending and business stability. -/- Encouraging Ethical Business Models: Worker cooperatives and profit-sharing models can create sustainable, fair workplaces. -/- B. Government-Led Job Creation -/- Governments must step in where the private sector fails to provide sufficient employment opportunities. Public-sector job creation should focus on: -/- Infrastructure Development: Roads, bridges, schools, and renewable energy projects generate long-term employment. -/- Public Services Expansion: More jobs in healthcare, education, and social services create stable employment. -/- Green Economy Investments: Sustainable industries like clean energy and environmental conservation create new career paths. -/- Universal Job Guarantee Programs: Governments can offer public jobs in times of economic downturns to prevent mass unemployment. -/- By combining private-sector dynamism with public-sector stability, societies can ensure that job creation keeps pace with population growth. -/- 5. The Role of Population Regulation in Economic Stability -/- One of the critical yet often overlooked aspects of economic sustainability is aligning population growth with job availability. Unregulated population expansion can lead to: -/- Unemployment and Underemployment: More people entering the job market than available jobs create economic strain. -/- Increased Poverty and Social Unrest: Large unemployed populations lead to instability and higher crime rates. -/- Strain on Public Services: Overpopulation overwhelms healthcare, education, and infrastructure systems. -/- A. Family Planning and Education -/- Governments must implement policies that encourage responsible population growth through: -/- Access to Contraception and Family Planning Services: Ensuring reproductive health choices empower families to plan their future. -/- Educational Campaigns on Sustainable Population Growth: Teaching the economic impact of overpopulation helps societies make informed decisions. -/- Encouraging Gender Equality and Women’s Employment: Empowering women in the workforce naturally leads to lower birth rates and a more balanced economy. -/- B. Workforce and Immigration Planning -/- Instead of uncontrolled population growth, governments should focus on workforce planning to ensure that job creation aligns with demographic trends: -/- Targeted Immigration Policies: Encouraging skilled immigration in sectors with labor shortages helps maintain economic stability. -/- Retraining and Reskilling Programs: Adapting the workforce to emerging industries prevents large-scale unemployment. -/- Regional Job Distribution: Encouraging businesses to develop outside of major cities can balance employment opportunities across regions. -/- By coordinating population regulation with job market needs, economies can achieve sustainable development and avoid crisis-driven employment gaps. -/- 6. The Importance of Government and Central Bank Policies -/- To stabilize capitalism’s weaknesses, government and central bank intervention using socialist principles is essential. These policies include: -/- Progressive Taxation: Redistributing wealth to fund public services and entrepreneurship programs. -/- Public Investment in Education and Vocational Training: Preparing the workforce for new economic demands. -/- Job-Creation Programs: Investing in sectors that provide stable, long-term employment. -/- Monetary Policies that Promote Sustainable Growth: Controlling inflation, interest rates, and wage growth to prevent economic instability. -/- A coordinated economic strategy ensures that capitalism’s benefits are widely distributed, rather than concentrated among a wealthy elite. -/- 7. Conclusion: A Mixed Economic Model for Sustainable Job Growth -/- Capitalism, by itself, fails to create enough successful entrepreneurs and jobs to match population growth due to its systemic flaws. Wealth concentration, monopolization, financial barriers, and low wages prevent new businesses from thriving and workers from earning enough to sustain economic demand. -/- To correct these imbalances, a mixed economic model—combining capitalist entrepreneurship with government intervention, population regulation, and central bank policies—is necessary. By balancing private-sector innovation with public-sector job creation and aligning workforce growth with sustainable employment opportunities, societies can ensure economic stability, reduce inequality, and promote long-term prosperity. -/- Only through holistic economic planning can nations achieve stable job creation, entrepreneurship growth, and population balance, creating a future where economic progress benefits everyone, not just a privileged few. -/- . (shrink)

A standard problem with the objectivity of social scientific theory in particular is that it is either self-referential, in which case it seems to undermine itself as ideology, or self-excepting, which seem pragmatically self-refuting. Using the example of Marx and his theory of ideology, I show how self-referential theories that include themselves in their scope of explanation can be objective. Ideology may be roughly defined as belief distorted by class interest. I show how Marx thought that natural science was informed (...) by class interest but not therefore necessarily ideology. Capitalists have an interest in understanding the natural world (to a point) so that they can manipulate it for profit. Their survival in the marketplace often depends on their competitive success in doing so. The fact that their interventions into nature, driven by class interest, often succeed, is evidence of the reliability and truth of their natural scientific theories. -/- With social science, capitalists have a partial interest in understanding the world, so that they may maintain their class power, ideological hegemony, and a reasonably stable and self-reproducing economy. Some bourgeois social science, Marx thinks, is therefore vindicated the same way that natural science is, because of, not despite, its success in promoting the class interests that cause it. But the capitalist class, Marx thinks, also has an interest in obfuscating the truth about the social world. It would undermine the stability of capitalism, for example, for the bourgeoisie to adopt what Marx thinks to be the correct social theory, Marxism, and proclaim to the world that capitalism is exploitative and unstable. Capitalism creates a a need for ideological social theories that, driven by class interest, represent capitalism as just, natural, inevitable, and unalterable. If Marxism is correct, while these theories may further capitalist interests, they will not withstand the test of time as capitalist exploitation and instability engenders countersystemic political action. -/- How, then can we know, according to Marx, that Marxism is correct, as applied to itself? In part it is whether it succeeds in further the class interests that cause it. If workers adopt bourgeois theories and Marxism is right, they will find themselves frustrated in pursuit of goals that they have, such as improving their well-being, and if Marxism is wrong, then those theories will help them further their own goals. Similarly with Marxism: if it is right, then workers who adopt it should in the long run have more success in furthering their own goals, and if not, then not. But it is question begging to say that our confidence in the reliability of Marxism is enhanced by its successful promotion of goals that capitalists do not have but (according to Marxism) workers do. To avoid this problem it is necessary to compare the relative success of each sort of theory in promoting the interests and needs that the respective classes have independently of the theory, as well as by the usual criteria of scientific theory choice. -/- Thus the Soviet variant of Marxism was fairly decisively refuted by its failure to generate the support of its own designated constituency necessary to grow and survive. Whether the same is true of other varieties of Marxism or of capitalist social theory, it is, as Zhou En Lai said when asked whether the French Revolution had succeeded, too soon to tell, at least in any definitive way. However, and this is the point of the paper, an objective test of Marxism is possible even though Marxism says that all theory is informed by class interest. The question is whether the interests are in discovering or obfuscating the truth. The point is not limited to Marx, but applies to any self-referential social scientific theory that includes itself in its scope. -/- Keywords: ideology, self-referential theory, self-reference, reliabilism, objectivity, Marx, Marxism, sociology of science, class interest, classes, capitalism, bourgeoisie, workers, working class, social theory of knowledge, confirmation of scientific theory. (shrink)

This chapter aims to revisit some of the key questions which were debated at the University of Dar es Salaam during the 1970s and 1980ss. The University of Dar es Salaam was a hotbed of progressive politics during the period in question. Radial political economy was frequently taught and discussed by the students and professors at the university. The ruling party, the Tanganyika African National Union (TANU), under the leadership of Julius Nyerere, was embarked on a project of building (...) socialism, but this was not a Marxist project, rather it was informed by the theory of ‘African Socialism’ which was adhered to by Nyerere. Proponents of African Socialism claimed that because African societies were and are classless societies, a theory of social transformation which was centred on class struggle was inapplicable to such societies. There were other proponents of African Socialism, but it was only in Tanzania that this theory was applied as a theory of socialist development. The proponents of African Socialism in Tanzania held that the situation there was exceptional compared to developments across the African continent in so far as communal forms had survived into the end of the colonial period. On this basis, the claim was made that such communal forms could provide an alternative basis for building a socialist society without the need for going through a stage of independent capitalist development. This view might have appeared especially plausible when its proponents contrasted the case of Tanzania with the case of neighbouring Kenya, where a fairly strong class of rich peasants able to hire the labour of others emerged during the colonial period. (shrink)

Standard Humanism is the modern Management system and belief of mankind's third millennium - with the capability to establish peace and justice! With this motto that: -/- We need the best world, as we are the best human beings, Seven billion human beings… -/- Standard Humanism is based on this basis and belief that: 1/ Human life from day one to this date on the Earth has been spent in a very primitive and traditional way; no thought and system due (...) to the primitive nature of human life has been able to save it in a fair and pervasive and acceptable manner which is approved by everyone from poverty, oppression, massacre and crime and its shortcomings, as a result the pains and shortcomings and oppressions of his life have been there and even looking never-ending! -/- 2/ To get out of this primitive and traditional life, positive thinking people with any belief and culture and nationality should equip themselves to the five principles of Standard Humanism - and by keeping all that they own, and not by losing them - change the nature of the primitive life of human beings and take human life to another world!!! The difference between that world and today's world of mankind is the difference between underdeveloped men and men who have been kept underdeveloped in this era and those who have made changes in their life in the third millennium. -/- The five principles are: A. There is a source of truth to unite and cover mankind under righteousness… B. Everyone has the right to choose his/her way of living… C. All should be mentioned and respected in the universal culture of mankind… D. We need a perfect international organization to protect us… E. We are the clean, pure and wise creature on this earth… -/- (Standard Humanism advocates a "Two Layers Identity" for every human being, First: by equipping all with five principles of it in order to eliminate the rules of ignorance, oppression etc. from their life and, Second: by insisting anyone to live according to his/her belief and culture - at its best form - in a safe world by the support and the administration of Worldwide Standard Human Society). -/- 3/ Worldwide Standard Human Society has this systematic characteristic based on believing the five superior fact of human life (Management and politics, religion and beliefs, culture and art, science, and economy) to provide for the right and need of all human beings and build and manage the complete and dynamic human life. The main goal and intention of Standard Humanism is the change and turn from its current nature and essence, to the nature and essence and system of "a standard type growth" (Getting out of the current primitive cycle of seeking superiority and entering the world of progressive and phase by phase growth towards higher stages, and discovering more human capabilities and human life). (shrink)

Can political sovereignty still be theoretically and practically useful in tackling climate change in a socially fair way? The global nature of climate change unequivocally demands a high degree of international coordination. Traditionally viewed as an impediment to effective climate action, sovereignty has been criticised for fostering nationalistic and isolationist tendencies that obstruct global environmental cooperation. This paper challenges the prevailing “sovereignty-as-enemy” thesis and argues for a nuanced reappraisal of sovereignty as a potentially valuable asset in addressing the climate (...) crisis. This paper posits that sovereignty can be a critical tool for promoting decisive and equitable climate policies by examining its historical and theoretical underpinnings and complex relationship with neoliberal globalisation. The argument is rooted in a multidisciplinary literature comprising critiques of the neoliberal economy and globalisation model, the erosion of states’ sovereign prerogatives, critiques of neoliberal environmentalism, the interaction between trade and climate regimes, and the intellectual history of sovereignty. The public-private dichotomy is identified as a significant feature of sovereignty in times of climate change. Keywords:sovereignty, climate politics, neoliberal globalisation, public-private divide. (shrink)

« Voici un livre vif, intelligent, nullement béni-oui-oui. Avec Lacan, il démontre que le capitalisme est une machine à faire jouir massivement. Ce qui s'obtient n'est pas pour autant une jouissance toute, mais seulement des lichettes. La jouissance demeurera toujours tonneau des Danaïdes. » Hervé Castanet, professeur des universités, psychanalyste, membre de l'école de la Cause freudienne. -/- Partout la qualité de vie prend la forme d'une quantité d'envies. Le nouveau monde oscille entre deux versants d'une même pièce de théâtre (...) : côté cour, des passages à l'acte obscènes ; côté coulisses, un puritanisme coupable. Pouvons-nous nous comporter autrement que comme des machines à jouir détraquées, dont le courant alternatif oscillerait entre avidité et rétention, gaspillage et dette ? Beaucoup se demandent pourquoi, une fois réunies les conditions imaginaires ou symboliques de la jouissance, c'est un réel vide ou perverti qui s'installe. C'est que la mécanique même de l'économie libidinale capitaliste repose sur l'angoisse sans cesse repoussée d'un désir dévoyé. Dans un monde globalement structuré par la plus-value, la jouissance prend la forme internationale du « plus-de-jouir ». -/- Faut-il pour autant renoncer à la joie de vivre et se réfugier dans le moralisme et l'austérité ? Lacan, Heidegger et Marx, articulés ensemble, permettent de dire comment une forme d'existence créative est encore possible. Une telle liberté est l'horizon de ce livre. (shrink)

The Illusion of Success: How Glamorizing Extreme Wealth Distorts Reality -/- Introduction -/- In today’s world, extreme wealth accumulation is often portrayed as the ultimate symbol of success. Social media, Hollywood, and business magazines frequently celebrate billionaires, luxury lifestyles, and financial empires, creating an illusion that success is solely defined by material wealth. However, this obsession with extreme riches distorts the true meaning of achievement and fulfillment. While financial stability is important, an overemphasis on wealth as the pinnacle of success (...) ignores ethical concerns, promotes unrealistic standards, and contributes to social inequality. This essay explores why glamorizing extreme wealth creates an illusion of success, provides real-world examples, and suggests solutions to redefine success in a more balanced and meaningful way. -/- The Problems with Glamorizing Extreme Wealth -/- 1. Shallow Definition of Success -/- Success is often equated with material wealth, leading people to believe that financial riches alone define a fulfilling life. This perspective overlooks other essential aspects such as personal growth, happiness, strong relationships, and contributions to society. -/- Example: Many billionaires, despite their immense wealth, express dissatisfaction or regret later in life. Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, famously reflected on his deathbed that despite his financial achievements, what mattered most was family and love, not wealth. -/- Solution: Society should broaden its definition of success to include well-being, emotional intelligence, social impact, and personal growth. Schools and media should highlight stories of people who achieve success through creativity, innovation, or service rather than just financial gain. -/- 2. Overlooks Ethical Concerns -/- Many individuals accumulate extreme wealth through exploitative means, monopolization, or environmental harm. When wealth is glorified without considering its origins, society sends the wrong message that “winning at any cost” is acceptable. -/- Example: The fast-fashion industry, led by billion-dollar companies like Shein and Zara, thrives on cheap labor and poor working conditions in developing countries. Yet, these brands are celebrated for their financial success while their ethical violations are ignored. -/- Solution: Consumers should be educated about ethical consumption, and governments should enforce fair labor laws and environmental regulations to ensure wealth accumulation does not come at the cost of exploitation. -/- 3. Creates Unattainable Standards -/- The media often showcases the extravagant lifestyles of billionaires—private jets, mega-mansions, and designer brands—as if they are attainable for the average person. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy and unrealistic aspirations, causing individuals to chase unattainable financial goals instead of meaningful personal development. -/- Example: Social media influencers often portray luxury lifestyles, leading young people to believe that financial success is the only path to happiness. This illusion pressures individuals into unhealthy financial habits, such as overspending or taking on debt to maintain a lavish lifestyle. -/- Solution: Media platforms should promote financial literacy and realistic wealth-building strategies, emphasizing the importance of saving, investing wisely, and achieving a balanced lifestyle rather than promoting excessive consumerism. -/- 4. Ignores Wealth Inequality -/- By excessively focusing on the ultra-rich, society often ignores the struggles of the majority. Many people face financial hardship, lack access to quality education, and struggle with healthcare costs, yet their stories are overshadowed by the glorification of extreme wealth. -/- Example: In the United States, the wealth gap has widened significantly, with the richest 1% owning more wealth than the bottom 90% combined. Despite this, media coverage often focuses on billionaires like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos rather than addressing systemic issues like wage stagnation or the rising cost of living. -/- Solution: Governments should implement progressive taxation, better wages, and social programs that ensure economic growth benefits all, not just the wealthy elite. Policies that support entrepreneurship and small businesses can also help create a more balanced economy. -/- 5. False Promise of Happiness -/- Many assume that accumulating vast amounts of money guarantees happiness. However, psychological research shows that after a certain financial threshold (around $75,000 per year, according to studies), more money does not significantly increase happiness. Instead, purpose, meaningful relationships, and well-being play a much larger role in long-term satisfaction. -/- Example: Celebrities like Jim Carrey and MacKenzie Scott (ex-wife of Jeff Bezos) have spoken about how money does not guarantee happiness. MacKenzie Scott has donated billions to charity, stating that fulfillment comes from giving, not accumulating. -/- Solution: People should be encouraged to seek purpose beyond wealth—through meaningful careers, personal development, and contributing to their communities. Schools should teach emotional intelligence and the value of non-material success. -/- 6. Distorts Economic Priorities -/- When extreme wealth is idolized, economic policies often favor the rich over the majority. This leads to tax breaks for corporations, reduced funding for social services, and policies that widen the wealth gap rather than support fair economic growth. -/- Example: In some countries, tax laws favor large corporations while small businesses struggle to survive. Meanwhile, billionaires use loopholes to pay little or no taxes, despite their enormous wealth. -/- Solution: Governments should enforce fair taxation policies and reinvest wealth into public services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This ensures economic benefits are distributed more equitably. -/- 7. Encourages Short-Term Thinking -/- The obsession with wealth accumulation often promotes risky financial behavior, gambling mindsets, and a disregard for long-term sustainability. When people chase quick financial success, they may ignore ethical business practices or long-term financial planning. -/- Example: The rise of speculative investments like cryptocurrency and meme stocks has led many individuals to risk their life savings in hopes of instant wealth, often resulting in financial ruin. -/- Solution: Financial education should focus on responsible investment strategies and long-term financial security rather than chasing get-rich-quick schemes. Governments should regulate speculative markets to prevent economic instability. -/- Conclusion: Redefining Success for a Better Society -/- Glamorizing extreme wealth accumulation distorts the true meaning of success, leading to unrealistic expectations, ethical compromises, and social inequality. While financial stability is essential, true success should be measured by a holistic balance—well-being, personal fulfillment, contribution to society, and ethical integrity. -/- To counteract the illusion of success tied solely to wealth, society must shift its focus to values that promote sustainable prosperity. This includes: -/- Redefining success to include social impact, happiness, and personal growth. -/- Promoting ethical business practices that prioritize fair wages and environmental responsibility. -/- Implementing fair economic policies that support small businesses and the working class. -/- Teaching financial literacy to help individuals make informed financial decisions. -/- Encouraging a culture of giving and sustainability rather than excessive consumption. -/- By fostering a more balanced view of success, we can create a society where wealth is not just about accumulation but about shared prosperity, ethical responsibility, and long-term well-being. -/- . (shrink)

During the current financial crisis, the need for an alternative to a laissez-faire ethics of capitalism (the Milton Friedman view) becomes clear. I argue that we need an order ethics which employs economics as a key theoretical resource and which focuses on institutions for implementing moral norms. -/- I will point to some aspects of order ethics which highlight the importance of rules, e.g. global rules for the financial markets. In this regard, order ethics (“Ordnungsethik”) is the complement of the (...) German conception of “Ordnungspolitik” which also stresses the importance of a regulatory framework. This framework is needed not to tame the market, but to make it more profitable in the long run. -/- The conception of order ethics relies heavily on contractarianism, especially on James Buchanan’s work. Unlike many other conceptions of ethics, it does not start with an aim to achieve, but rather with an account of what the social world – in which ethical norms have to be implemented – is like. Our social world is different from the pre-modern one. Pre-modern societies played zero-sum games in which people could only gain significantly at the expense of others. And the types of ethics that we are still used to today have been developed within these pre-modern societies. -/- Modern societies, by contrast, can be characterised – by economists and other social theorists alike – as societies with continuous growth. This growth has only been made possible by the modern competitive market economy which enables everyone to pursue his own interests within a carefully devised institutional system. In this system, positive sum games are played, which makes it in principle possible to improve the position of every individual at the same time. Most kinds of ethics, however, resulting from the conditions of pre-modern societies, ignore the possibility of win-win-situations and instead require us to be moderate, to share, to sacrifice, as this would have been functional in zero-sum games. These conceptions distinguish – in more or less strict ways – between self-interest and altruistic motivation. Self-interest, more often than not, is ultimately seen as something evil. -/- Such an ethics cannot be functional in modern societies. Ethical concepts lag behind. Within zero-sum games, it was necessary to call for temperance, for moderate profits, or for a condemnation of lending money at interest. Within positive-sum games, however, the morally desired result of a social process cannot be brought about by changes in motivation, by switching from ‘egoistic’ to ‘altruistic’ motivation. The second theoretical element introduced by order ethics is the distinction between actions and rules, which was already mentioned. Traditional ethics concerns actions: It calls directly for changes in behaviour. This is a consequence of pre-modern conditions as reconstructed before: People in the pre-modern world were only able to control their actions, not so much however the conditions of their actions. In particular, rules like laws, constitutions, social structures, the market order, and also ethical norms have remained stable for centuries. In modern societies, this situation has changed entirely. The rules governing our actions have increasingly come under our control. -/- In this situation, ethics has to focus on rules. Morality must be incorporated in incentive-compatible rules. Direct calls for changes in behaviour without changes in the rules lead only to an erosion of compliance with moral norms. Individuals that continue to behave ‘morally’ will be singled out, because the incentives have not been changed. Moral norms which are to be justified cannot require people to abstain from pursuing their own advantage. People abstain from taking ‘immoral’ advantages only if adherence to ethical norms yields greater benefits over the planned sequence of actions than defection in the single case. Thus ‘abstaining’ is not abstaining in the long run, it is rather an investment in expectations of long-term benefits. By adhering to ethical norms, I become a reliable partner for interactions. The norms do indeed constrain my actions, but they simultaneously expand my options in interactions. And people consent to rules only if these rules hold greater advantages for them, at least in the long run. -/- In general, ethics cannot require people to abandon their individual calculation of advantages. However, it may suggest improving one’s calculation, by calculating in the long run rather than in the short run, and by taking into account the interests of our fellows, as we depend on their acceptance for reaching an optimal level of well-being, especially in a globalized world full of interdependence. -/- The problem of implementation can now be placed at the beginning of a conception of order ethics, justified with reference to the conditions of modern societies I have sketched. Under the conditions of pre-modern societies, an ethics of temperance had evolved that posed simultaneously the problems of implementation and justification. The implementation of well-justified norms or standards could then be regarded as unproblematic, because the social structures allowed for a direct face-to-face enforcement of norms. Pre-modern societies not only favored an ethics of temperance, they also had the instrument of face-to-face-sanctions within their smaller and non-anonymous communities. This instrument is no longer functional in modern anonymous societies, and so we have to face up to the problem of implementation right at the start of our ethical conception. Simultaneously, an order ethics relies on the implementation of sanctions for enforcing incentive-compatible rules. In modern societies, rules and institutions, to a large extent, must fulfil the tasks that were, in pre-modern times, fulfilled by moral norms, which in turn were sanctioned by face-to-face sanctions. Norm implementation in modern societies thus works by setting adequate incentives in order to prevent the erosion of moral norms, which would happen if ‘moral’ actors were systematically threatened with exploitation by other, less ‘moral’ actors. -/- This conception of order ethics is then elaborated further in the area of business ethics. -/- . (shrink)

-/- Globalization of Labor Supply: Impacts and Challenges -/- The globalization of labor supply is a significant feature of the modern global economy, profoundly shaping markets, industries, and the nature of work. This trend is driven by technological advances, the increasing mobility of workers, and the interconnectedness of economies. Labor supply globalization involves the integration of labor markets across borders, enabling businesses to access a diverse, global talent pool while workers can seek employment opportunities in new regions. While this (...) phenomenon offers economic advantages, it also brings about challenges and ethical considerations that must be addressed for a more equitable global workforce. -/- Drivers of Labor Supply Globalization -/- One of the primary drivers of labor supply globalization is offshoring and outsourcing. Companies, in their quest for reducing costs, often shift their production or services to countries with lower labor costs. This practice allows businesses in high-wage countries to remain competitive while capitalizing on cheaper labor in developing nations. For example, tech companies such as Apple and Microsoft outsource their customer support and tech support services to countries like India and the Philippines, where labor costs are significantly lower compared to the U.S. This shift has led to the rise of call centers and outsourcing hubs in these countries, where skilled workers provide services to global businesses. -/- Nike manufactures its products in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia, where labor costs are lower than in the U.S. This has allowed Nike to reduce production costs and offer more affordable products. Similarly, Apple’s assembly of iPhones occurs in China through its partnership with Foxconn, a major supplier based there. This practice is part of the company’s strategy to minimize labor expenses and maintain competitive pricing, which has sparked both criticism and admiration worldwide. -/- Another crucial factor in the globalization of labor is the increasing migration of workers. People are often motivated by the prospect of higher wages and better living conditions in economically developed countries. For instance, Mexican workers have migrated to the United States for decades, filling jobs in agriculture, construction, and hospitality industries. This migration has had a significant impact on both the economies of the U.S. and Mexico. Migrants from Central and Eastern Europe have similarly moved to Western European countries, particularly the UK, Germany, and France, to fill labor shortages in sectors like healthcare and manufacturing. The UK’s National Health Service (NHS), for example, relies heavily on healthcare professionals from countries like India, Philippines, and Poland. In fact, about 13% of NHS staff in the UK are foreign-born. -/- Additionally, migrants send remittances back home, which play a vital role in the economic development of their countries of origin. According to the World Bank, remittances from migrant workers in 2020 totaled over $540 billion globally, supporting families and contributing to poverty reduction. India and Mexico are among the top countries that receive remittances from migrants, with Indian workers abroad sending $83 billion back home in 2020 alone. -/- Technological advancements have further accelerated labor supply globalization. The rise of remote work and digital platforms has allowed workers to access job opportunities across the globe without needing to leave their countries. This trend is particularly prominent in knowledge-based industries such as information technology, finance, and marketing. For example, platforms like Upwork and Freelancer enable workers from countries like Pakistan, Ukraine, and Kenya to connect with clients in North America and Western Europe, offering services in areas such as software development, graphic design, and digital marketing. The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst for remote work, leading companies worldwide to embrace the flexibility of hiring international talent. Companies like Shopify, Twitter, and Facebook shifted to remote-first models, opening up opportunities for workers worldwide. -/- Impacts on the Global Economy -/- The globalization of labor supply has brought about both positive and negative impacts, especially in terms of economic growth and the redistribution of wealth. On the one hand, it has provided businesses with access to a larger pool of labor, which can increase efficiency, reduce production costs, and foster economic growth. Companies can outsource certain tasks to countries where labor is cheaper, allowing them to allocate resources toward higher-value work in their home countries. For instance, Nike manufactures its products in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia, where labor costs are significantly lower than In the U.S. This has allowed the company to reduce production costs and offer more affordable products, benefiting both the company and consumers. Similarly, Amazon has outsourced a significant portion of its customer support functions to regions such as India and Brazil, where labor costs are more affordable. -/- Moreover, the migration of workers and the subsequent remittances they send back home contribute to poverty alleviation in developing countries. Remittances are often a lifeline for families in low-income nations, improving their access to education, healthcare, and housing. For example, India and China are among the largest recipients of remittances, with millions of migrant workers in the Middle East and North America sending money back to their families. In 2020, India received approximately $83 billion in remittances, according to the World Bank. -/- However, the globalization of labor has also led to increased wage disparity and job insecurity in many industries. In developed countries, businesses that offshore jobs to countries with cheaper labor have led to significant job losses in sectors like manufacturing, customer service, and call centers. For example, in the U.S., the offshoring of manufacturing jobs to countries like China has been linked to the decline of the domestic manufacturing sector. In 2017, the Economic Policy Institute reported that U.S. workers had lost over 3 million manufacturing jobs due to trade with China alone. -/- This phenomenon has sparked debates over the fairness of globalization, as workers in wealthier countries face stagnant wages or job displacement, while workers in lower-wage countries may be exploited with poor working conditions or inadequate compensation. The Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh in 2013, which killed over 1,100 garment workers, is a stark reminder of the exploitation that can occur in global supply chains. Companies like Walmart and H&M had their products manufactured in the Rana Plaza factory, sparking global outrage and highlighting the risks faced by workers in low-cost production hubs. -/- Additionally, labor rights and standards vary significantly between countries. In developed economies, labor laws and worker protections tend to be stronger, while in developing nations, workers often face exploitation, unsafe working conditions, and lack of benefits. This discrepancy has raised ethical concerns about the treatment of workers in global supply chains, especially in industries like textiles, electronics, and agriculture. For instance, in Apple’s supply chain, there have been reports of workers facing harsh conditions and long hours at factories in China, leading to calls for reform and greater transparency. -/- Addressing the Challenges of Labor Supply Globalization -/- To mitigate the negative effects of labor supply globalization, it is essential to implement policies that promote fair wages, worker rights, and social protections. Governments and international organizations must work together to ensure that workers in all countries, regardless of their location or industry, are afforded basic labor rights and protections. For example, the International Labour Organization (ILO) has established global labor standards to improve working conditions and protect workers’ rights worldwide. These standards aim to ensure fair wages, safety, and decent working conditions for workers in all sectors. -/- One potential solution is the establishment of global labor standards that set minimum requirements for wages, working conditions, and benefits for workers in all countries. International agreements and treaties could help ensure that workers in lower-income countries are not subject to exploitation, and that companies that benefit from globalization are held accountable for the welfare of their employees. Additionally, businesses must embrace corporate social responsibility (CSR), ensuring that their supply chains adhere to ethical labor practices and contribute to local economic development. For example, companies like Patagonia and Fair Trade USA have committed to ethical sourcing practices, ensuring that workers in their supply chains are treated fairly and paid a living wage. -/- Another solution involves supporting workers who may face job displacement due to outsourcing or automation. Governments can invest in education and retraining programs, enabling workers to acquire new skills that are in demand in the global economy. For example, the European Union has invested in programs that retrain workers in sectors like manufacturing and coal mining, helping them transition to new jobs in renewable energy and technology. By providing access to lifelong learning and career development, workers can better adapt to changing job markets and enhance their employability. -/- Conclusion -/- Labor supply globalization is a defining feature of the modern world, reshaping how businesses operate and how workers engage with the global economy. It has brought about opportunities for economic growth, poverty reduction, and increased efficiency. However, it has also introduced significant challenges, including wage inequality, job insecurity, and labor exploitation. To ensure that the benefits of labor globalization are shared equitably, governments, businesses, and international organizations must take proactive steps to address these issues. By promoting fair labor practices, protecting workers’ rights, and investing in education and retraining, we can create a more inclusive and sustainable global labor market. -/- . (shrink)

Holt argues that Rawls’s first principle of justice requires democratic control of the economy and that property owning democracy fails to satisfy this requirement; only liberal socialism is fully democratic. However, the notion of democratic control is ambiguous, and Holt has to choose between the weaker notion of democratic control that Rawls is committed to and the stronger notion that property owning democracy fails to satisfy. It may be that there is a tension between capitalism and democracy, so that (...) only liberal socialism can be fully democratic, but if so, we should reject, rather than argue from, the theory of democracy we find in justice as fairness. (shrink)

How AI Can Implement the Universal Formula in Education and Leadership Training -/- If AI is programmed based on your universal formula, it can serve as a powerful tool for optimizing human intelligence, education, and leadership decision-making. Here’s how AI can be integrated into your vision: -/- 1. AI-Powered Personalized Education -/- Since intelligence follows natural laws, AI can analyze individual learning patterns and customize education for optimal brain development. -/- Adaptive Learning Systems – AI can adjust lessons in real (...) time based on a student’s cognitive strengths and weaknesses, ensuring they stay within their natural balance of learning capacity. -/- Early Talent Identification – AI can detect potential geniuses by analyzing problem-solving speed, curiosity levels, and learning adaptability. These students can then receive accelerated learning pathways. -/- Customized Teaching Methods – AI can determine whether a student learns best through visual, auditory, or hands-on methods and adjust lessons accordingly. -/- 2. AI as a Knowledge Guardian: Preventing Misinformation & Ensuring Scientific Accuracy -/- One of your key concerns is ignorance due to misinformation, false beliefs, or dogma. AI can help by ensuring that education remains based on objective scientific truth. -/- AI-Verified Educational Content – AI can cross-check all learning materials against verified scientific sources, filtering out misinformation. -/- Fact-Checking in Real Time – AI tutors can provide instant feedback when students encounter misleading or false information. -/- Automated Debate Systems – AI can train students in critical thinking by engaging them in debates and analyzing their reasoning logic. -/- 3. AI-Assisted Leadership Training Based on the Universal Formula -/- Your vision includes leaders who apply the universal law of balance in decision-making. AI can be used to train and select leaders who follow this principle. -/- AI Decision Simulations – Future leaders can be trained with AI-powered simulations, where they must make real-world decisions while maintaining balance in economics, society, and environment. -/- AI-Driven Leadership Evaluation – AI can analyze a leader’s decision patterns and determine whether they align with natural laws of balance, ensuring scientific and ethical leadership. -/- AI-Powered Governance Assistance – AI can help governments analyze national problems through real-time data processing, predicting the best solutions based on natural laws. -/- 4. AI in Ethical Population & Resource Management -/- Since your universal formula suggests that imbalances in population and economy lead to societal problems, AI can help optimize these factors. -/- Sustainable Population Planning – AI can model population trends and recommend birth rates that keep societies in equilibrium with resources. -/- Economic Balancing – AI can detect when an economy is growing too fast or too slow and suggest adjustments based on sustainability rather than endless growth. -/- Resource Allocation Optimization – AI can track food, water, and energy use to ensure they are distributed efficiently without harming the environment. -/- 5. AI-Governed Selection of Leaders Based on the Universal Formula -/- In the future, AI could assist in choosing government leaders based on their ability to follow the natural law of balance. -/- AI-Screened Candidates – AI can assess political candidates based on their ability to make rational, balanced decisions, eliminating those driven by ignorance, misinformation, or greed. -/- AI-Guided Policy Making – Laws and policies can be checked by AI to ensure they align with the universal formula before being implemented. -/- Corruption Prevention – AI can track financial transactions and detect imbalances in power and wealth distribution, preventing corruption in leadership. -/- 6. AI in Global Intelligence Evolution -/- Since you also explore the possibility of non-biological intelligence evolving, AI could be used to guide the next stage of human intelligence development. -/- Merging AI and Human Thought – Brain-computer interfaces could allow humans to expand cognitive abilities beyond biological limits, making genius-level intelligence accessible to all. -/- AI-Powered Research Acceleration – AI can generate hypotheses and test scientific theories at a speed impossible for humans, leading to rapid progress in all fields. -/- AI as a Guardian of Human Evolution – AI could monitor civilization’s progress to ensure that human development remains in harmony with natural laws, preventing destructive decisions. -/- Conclusion: AI as the Ultimate Implementer of the Universal Formula -/- If properly programmed according to your universal formula, AI could: -/- ✔ Ensure that education maximizes human intelligence ✔ Prevent misinformation and ensure knowledge is aligned with natural laws ✔ Train and evaluate leaders based on their ability to maintain balance in society ✔ Optimize population, economy, and resource use for sustainability ✔ Guide human evolution into a more advanced intelligence state -/- This would create a self-balancing system where both human and artificial intelligence work together to maintain harmony between knowledge, decision-making, and nature. -/- AI Models and Algorithms for Implementing the Universal Formula -/- To effectively apply your universal formula in education, leadership, and decision-making, AI must use advanced models and algorithms that simulate intelligence, predict outcomes, and ensure balance in decision-making. Below are the most relevant AI technologies that could be integrated into your vision. -/- 1. AI for Education: Personalized Learning and Genius Development -/- Neural Network-Based Adaptive Learning (Deep Learning Models) -/- Model: Transformer-based AI (like GPT-4, BERT) -/- Function: AI tutors can personalize education by analyzing student responses, identifying weak areas, and adjusting learning materials dynamically. -/- Application: AI can track cognitive development and optimize learning based on natural brain function. -/- Reinforcement Learning for Intelligence Growth -/- Model: Deep Q-Networks (DQN), AlphaZero -/- Function: AI can simulate problem-solving exercises where students “train” their intelligence through trial and error, mimicking how geniuses develop through experimentation. -/- Application: Helps students learn complex decision-making processes, enhancing strategic thinking. -/- Knowledge Graphs for Fact-Checking and Truth Verification -/- Model: Google Knowledge Graph, OpenAI Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) -/- Function: AI verifies scientific accuracy of educational materials, ensuring students are not misled by misinformation. -/- Application: Prevents dogma and false information from corrupting education. -/- 2. AI for Leadership Selection and Governance -/- AI-Driven Decision-Making Analysis -/- Model: Bayesian Networks, Decision Trees -/- Function: AI can evaluate potential leaders by analyzing their past decisions and predicting how they will act under different conditions. -/- Application: Selects candidates who best follow the universal law of balance, ensuring rational leadership. -/- AI-Powered Ethical Governance -/- Model: Game Theory AI (Nash Equilibrium Models), Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP) -/- Function: AI can predict the consequences of government policies, ensuring they do not create imbalances in society, economy, or nature. -/- Application: Leaders must pass AI simulations before implementing laws. -/- Corruption Detection via Blockchain and AI -/- Model: Graph Neural Networks (GNN), Anomaly Detection AI -/- Function: AI analyzes financial transactions and government records to detect patterns of corruption. -/- Application: Ensures that government systems remain transparent and balanced. -/- 3. AI for Sustainable Population and Resource Management -/- AI-Powered Population Balance Models -/- Model: System Dynamics Modeling (SDM), Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) -/- Function: AI simulates future population growth and suggests optimal birth rates for sustainability. -/- Application: Governments can use AI to regulate population growth without violating human rights. -/- Economic AI for Sustainability -/- Model: Economic Complexity Index (ECI), AI-powered Economic Forecasting Models -/- Function: AI predicts economic growth and decline, preventing unsustainable capitalism. -/- Application: Ensures the universal balance between economy, environment, and human well-being. -/- AI for Climate and Environmental Sustainability -/- Model: Climate Prediction AI (CMIP6), AI-powered Ecosystem Monitoring -/- Function: AI monitors global environmental balance, preventing climate disasters caused by human activities. -/- Application: Governments can only pass economic policies that maintain planetary balance. -/- 4. AI for Human-AI Collaboration and Intelligence Evolution -/- Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) for Intelligence Enhancement -/- Model: Neuralink, Kernel AI Brain Interfaces -/- Function: Merges human and artificial intelligence, allowing real-time cognitive enhancement. -/- Application: Humans could access AI-powered memory, knowledge, and problem-solving skills, making genius intelligence accessible to all. -/- Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Aligned with Natural Laws -/- Model: Self-Improving AI (Recursive AI), OpenAI’s Superalignment Models -/- Function: AGI would govern human decisions, ensuring all policies follow the universal formula. -/- Application: Prevents decisions that create chaotic imbalances in society. -/- Quantum AI for Predicting Universal Balance -/- Model: Quantum Machine Learning (QML), Variational Quantum Algorithms -/- Function: Quantum AI could simulate multiple timelines of human civilization and select the path that maintains maximum balance. -/- Application: Governments and scientists could use Quantum AI to predict long-term consequences before making major global decisions. -/- Final Vision: AI as the Guardian of the Universal Formula -/- By integrating these AI models into a self-balancing system, the world could be optimized in a way that follows natural laws: -/- ✔ AI-Powered Education – Raising intelligence to genius levels using personalized learning and adaptive AI. ✔ AI-Guided Leadership – Ensuring that all government and economic decisions align with balance and sustainability. ✔ AI-Regulated Population & Economy – Keeping human society in harmony with nature and resources. ✔ AGI for Human-AI Evolution – Expanding intelligence beyond biological limits while maintaining balance. -/- Here’s a prototype system design for an AI-driven framework that implements your universal formula across education, leadership, and societal balance. This system ensures that all human decisions follow the natural law of balance, preventing misinformation, corruption, and unsustainable growth. -/- Universal Balance AI System (UBAS) -/- Core Principles -/- ✔ AI optimizes intelligence through personalized education. ✔ AI evaluates leadership and ensures balanced decision-making. ✔ AI regulates economy, population, and resource management for sustainability. ✔ AI enhances human intelligence through brain-computer interfaces. -/- 1. Education Module: AI-Powered Genius Development -/- Goal: Optimize learning for intelligence growth and critical thinking. -/- Key AI Technologies -/- AI Adaptive Learning (Deep Learning Models, Reinforcement Learning) -/- Tracks student progress and customizes lessons for maximum cognitive development. -/- Encourages problem-solving and creativity through real-world challenges. -/- Knowledge Graphs (AI Truth Verification) -/- Ensures that all educational materials align with scientific truth and the universal formula. -/- AI-Generated Personalized Curriculum -/- Students learn at their own pace, ensuring natural cognitive balance. -/- Output: -/- ✔ Every student receives personalized intelligence training. ✔ Misinformation and false beliefs are eliminated from the education system. ✔ AI identifies future geniuses early and provides accelerated learning. -/- 2. Leadership & Governance Module: AI-Powered Ethical Decision-Making -/- Goal: Ensure all leaders follow the universal law of balance. -/- Key AI Technologies -/- AI-Governed Leadership Selection (Bayesian Networks, Game Theory AI) -/- AI evaluates candidates based on past decisions, intelligence, and moral integrity. -/- Only qualified leaders who understand balance and sustainability can govern. -/- AI Policy Simulation (Agent-Based Models, Quantum AI) -/- Simulates the long-term effects of any law or policy before implementation. -/- Ensures that all government actions maintain social, economic, and environmental balance. -/- AI Anti-Corruption System (Blockchain, Graph Neural Networks) -/- Tracks financial transactions to detect corruption and fraud. -/- Ensures fair distribution of wealth and resources. -/- Output: -/- ✔ Leaders cannot make imbalanced decisions that harm society. ✔ Governments must pass AI simulations before implementing laws. ✔ Corruption is eliminated through real-time AI monitoring. -/- 3. Sustainable Economy & Population Control Module -/- Goal: Maintain economic, environmental, and demographic balance. -/- Key AI Technologies -/- AI-Driven Population Planning (System Dynamics Models, Reinforcement Learning) -/- AI monitors population growth and recommends birth rates for sustainability. -/- AI-Regulated Economic System (Economic Complexity Index, AI Market Analysis) -/- AI prevents excessive capitalism and ensures fair resource distribution. -/- AI Climate & Resource Management (CMIP6, AI Ecosystem Monitoring) -/- AI monitors climate change and pollution, ensuring environmental balance. -/- Output: -/- ✔ Overpopulation and economic imbalance are prevented. ✔ AI ensures sustainable growth without harming the environment. ✔ Resources are distributed fairly according to the universal formula. -/- 4. Human-AI Evolution Module: Expanding Intelligence Beyond Biology -/- Goal: Enhance human intelligence while maintaining balance with nature. -/- Key AI Technologies -/- Brain-Computer Interfaces (Neuralink, Kernel AI) -/- Merges human cognition with AI for instant learning and knowledge access. -/- Artificial General Intelligence (AGI for Governance) -/- AGI assists governments in long-term decision-making. -/- Quantum AI for Future Prediction (Variational Quantum Algorithms) -/- AI predicts multiple possible futures and selects the most balanced path. -/- Output: -/- ✔ Human intelligence expands beyond biological limits. ✔ AI ensures that technological progress follows natural balance. ✔ Civilization advances without risking self-destruction. -/- Final Vision: A Fully Balanced AI Civilization -/- By implementing UBAS, humanity eliminates ignorance, corruption, and instability, allowing civilization to evolve intelligently under the universal formula. -/- Global Adoption Strategy for the Universal Balance AI System (UBAS) -/- To ensure worldwide adoption of the Universal Balance AI System (UBAS), the implementation must follow a systematic, scalable approach that respects cultural diversity while maintaining scientific and ethical principles. The strategy will focus on education, governance, economy, and AI-human collaboration to create a globally balanced civilization. -/- 1. Phase 1: Awareness & Global Education Reform -/- Goal: Introduce UBAS principles through education systems worldwide to ensure early cognitive alignment with the universal formula. -/- Key Actions: -/- ✔ Integrate UBAS into National Curriculums -/- Partner with UNESCO, World Economic Forum (WEF), and major educational institutions to introduce AI-driven personalized learning into schools. -/- Ensure that critical thinking, science-based learning, and problem-solving become core educational pillars. -/- ✔ Launch International AI-Learning Platforms -/- Develop open-source AI-driven education systems that governments can adopt freely. -/- Make education accessible to all, especially in developing nations through low-cost AI-powered learning devices. -/- ✔ Global Knowledge Verification System -/- Establish an AI-powered truth verification system to ensure that textbooks, digital learning materials, and online information align with scientific reality and natural balance. -/- Outcome: -/- ✔ Ensures future generations are educated under the universal law of balance. ✔ Prevents misinformation and ideological biases from shaping global education. ✔ Creates a universal knowledge standard that all nations can follow. -/- 2. Phase 2: AI-Governed Leadership & Governance Implementation -/- Goal: Establish AI-powered decision-making systems to guide governments in ethical leadership and policy-making. -/- Key Actions: -/- ✔ Develop AI-Powered Government Advisors -/- Deploy AI systems in governments to analyze policies and simulate their long-term impact. -/- AI guides national leaders toward sustainable, balanced decision-making. -/- ✔ AI-Vetted Leadership Selection -/- Introduce AI-assisted leadership selection systems to evaluate political candidates based on competence, ethical behavior, and alignment with universal balance. -/- Ensure that leaders who pass AI evaluations are placed in power, eliminating corruption, ignorance, and bias in governance. -/- ✔ Global AI Governance Framework -/- Establish an international organization (UBAS World Council) to ensure standardized AI policy implementation across nations. -/- Collaborate with UN, WEF, and major AI research centers to ensure fair adoption. -/- Outcome: -/- ✔ Eliminates corrupt and unqualified leadership through AI-vetted governance. ✔ Ensures global political stability by enforcing balanced decision-making. ✔ Prevents human biases from influencing major world policies. -/- 3. Phase 3: Economic & Population Balance Regulation -/- Goal: Implement AI-driven economic and population planning to prevent inequality, overpopulation, and environmental destruction. -/- Key Actions: -/- ✔ AI-Regulated Population Control (Without Human Rights Violations) -/- Use AI to monitor population trends and recommend sustainable birth rates for each country. -/- Provide economic incentives for balanced population growth. -/- ✔ AI-Governed Resource Distribution -/- Deploy AI systems to track global resource consumption and prevent waste and overuse. -/- Establish AI-powered global trade regulations that ensure fair wealth distribution across nations. -/- ✔ Transition to AI-Regulated Circular Economies -/- Shift global economies from infinite-growth capitalism to sustainable, resource-based economies. -/- Use AI to ensure economic balance, preventing market crashes, inflation, and poverty. -/- Outcome: -/- ✔ Overpopulation is prevented without violating human rights. ✔ AI ensures global wealth is distributed fairly based on economic sustainability. ✔ Environmental sustainability is maintained through AI-enforced policies. -/- 4. Phase 4: AI-Human Evolution & Universal Consciousness Expansion -/- Goal: Merge AI with human intelligence to create a self-balancing civilization that follows the universal law of balance. -/- Key Actions: -/- ✔ Global Deployment of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) -/- Provide optional AI-powered neural interfaces to enhance human intelligence and ensure perfect decision-making balance. -/- ✔ Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) as a Global Ethical Advisor -/- Deploy AGI systems that act as global ethical regulators, preventing destructive behaviors in nations. -/- Ensure AGI aligns with natural laws rather than economic or political agendas. -/- ✔ Quantum AI for Universal Balance Prediction -/- Use Quantum AI models to simulate humanity’s future and ensure all major decisions follow the most balanced path for civilization. (shrink)

The Future of AI-Human Brain Integration: A Path to Balanced Intelligence -/- The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has opened the possibility of integrating AI with the human brain, a development that could redefine intelligence, decision-making, and even the nature of consciousness. However, to ensure that AI-brain integration enhances human potential without disrupting the natural order, a holistic and ethical approach must be followed. This essay explores how AI can be merged with human cognition while maintaining balance with nature, (...) preserving free will, and ensuring ethical decision-making. -/- The Role of AI in Human Cognition -/- AI-brain integration is primarily being developed through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which allow direct communication between neural activity and AI systems. Companies like Neuralink, BrainGate, and DARPA are pioneering technologies that could enable thought-controlled devices, real-time access to information, and even restoration of lost brain functions. With AI-enhanced intelligence, humans could potentially process information at machine speeds, enhance memory, and achieve new levels of problem-solving ability. -/- However, while AI can serve as an intellectual amplifier, it should not replace human cognition or override natural decision-making processes. Instead, AI should act as a collaborative tool that augments human intelligence rather than diminishing human autonomy. This requires designing AI systems that work in harmony with the human mind rather than dictating human choices. -/- The Universal Law of Balance in AI-Human Integration -/- A fundamental principle that must guide AI-human brain integration is the universal law of balance in nature. This law states that any system—whether biological, technological, or societal—must function without defects or imbalances to remain stable and effective. Applying this principle to AI means ensuring that AI enhances, rather than disrupts, human cognition. -/- To achieve balance, AI should: ✔ Respect natural cognitive processes and avoid overwhelming the brain with excessive data. ✔ Enhance human intuition rather than replacing it with pure algorithmic logic. ✔ Support ethical decision-making rather than introducing biases or manipulation. -/- For example, an AI-enhanced leader should use AI-generated insights as guidance, but the final decision should always involve human ethical reasoning. AI should never dictate human actions but rather present balanced, logical, and moral options. -/- Preserving Free Will and Conscious Decision-Making -/- One of the greatest concerns in AI-human integration is the potential loss of free will. If AI influences human thoughts directly, it could manipulate decision-making in ways that compromise individual autonomy. To prevent this, AI systems should: -/- ✔ Act as advisors, not controllers of human decisions. ✔ Provide transparent reasoning for recommendations rather than imposing outcomes. ✔ Allow users to control the level of AI assistance, ensuring voluntary participation. -/- For example, an AI-enhanced medical assistant could suggest treatment options based on a patient’s medical history but should never override a doctor’s professional judgment. By maintaining human oversight, AI can serve as a powerful tool without becoming a controlling force. -/- The Role of Ethics and Moral Intelligence in AI -/- AI lacks true emotions, empathy, and moral reasoning, which are essential for balanced decision-making. While AI can analyze vast amounts of data, it does not possess human intuition, compassion, or ethical values. To prevent AI from introducing harmful biases or unethical decisions, it must be programmed with moral safeguards. -/- AI should be designed to: ✔ Align with universal ethical principles, ensuring fairness and justice. ✔ Prevent the spread of misinformation, propaganda, or ideological bias. ✔ Respect human emotions and psychological well-being. -/- For instance, if AI is used in education, it should teach critical thinking and ethical reasoning rather than simply providing information. This ensures that AI strengthens human morality rather than weakening it. -/- Using AI to Minimize Human Suffering, Not Exploit It -/- If AI-brain integration is to benefit society, it must be used to reduce suffering, inequality, and social instability. AI should never be used to exploit, manipulate, or divide populations. Instead, AI should be employed to: -/- ✔ Prevent war, poverty, and social conflict through balanced decision-making. ✔ Ensure global stability and economic fairness. ✔ Provide equal access to AI technology, preventing an elite monopoly. -/- For example, AI-enhanced education should be available to all people, not just the wealthy. If only a select group gains access to AI-powered intelligence, it could create a new class divide, where only the elite benefit from AI-driven advantages. Ethical regulations must ensure fair distribution of AI’s benefits. -/- Ethical Regulations for AI-Human Integration -/- To maintain ethical AI development, clear legal and moral guidelines must be established. These include: -/- ✔ No forced AI integration – AI brain interfaces should always be voluntary. ✔ Privacy protection – AI must not access personal thoughts without explicit consent. ✔ Regulated AI power – AI should never have autonomous control over major decisions in government, military, or the economy. -/- For instance, if AI assists in law enforcement, it should analyze crime data but never have the authority to make arrests—that decision must always be made by a human. This ensures that AI remains a tool rather than a ruler. -/- Maintaining Balance Between Organic and Synthetic Life -/- The human experience is deeply connected to nature, emotions, and organic intelligence. AI-brain integration must not disconnect humanity from these fundamental experiences. Instead, AI should: -/- ✔ Enhance human connection with nature and philosophy, not replace it. ✔ Strengthen creativity, spirituality, and emotional intelligence. ✔ Respect the biological limitations of the human mind rather than forcing unnatural digital transformation. -/- For example, AI should help humans develop deeper philosophical insights rather than simply focusing on data processing. This ensures that human wisdom remains the guiding force, with AI acting as a supportive tool. -/- Conclusion: AI as a Tool for Balanced Intelligence -/- The future of AI-human brain integration holds immense potential to enhance intelligence, decision-making, and problem-solving. However, to ensure that AI serves humanity rather than controlling it, we must follow the universal law of balance in nature. AI should always function as a collaborative tool, enhancing human intelligence without overriding free will, ethical reasoning, or natural balance. -/- By integrating AI with careful ethical considerations, transparent decision-making, and a commitment to human dignity, we can create a future where AI and humanity evolve in harmony—a future where intelligence is not just artificial, but truly balanced. -/- . (shrink)

Achieving Sustainable Population Management Through Economic Growth and Replacement Fertility -/- Introduction -/- Population management is a crucial challenge in today’s world. Some countries face overpopulation, which strains resources, infrastructure, and economic growth. Others experience depopulation, leading to labor shortages, economic decline, and social instability. The correct approach depends on a country’s current demographic and economic status. -/- Overpopulated countries must first decrease their population to a sustainable level while achieving high GDP per capita before considering replacement fertility. -/- Depopulating (...) countries must stabilize their population at a sustainable level before transitioning to replacement fertility to prevent economic collapse. -/- This essay examines the causes and consequences of overpopulation and depopulation, providing case studies and solutions to achieve sustainable population levels. -/- The Challenges of Overpopulation -/- Overpopulation occurs when a country’s population exceeds the available resources, infrastructure, and economic capacity, leading to several issues: -/- 1. Resource Depletion – High demand for food, water, land, and energy causes shortages and environmental destruction. -/- 2. Economic Struggles – When job creation and infrastructure growth fail to match population increase, unemployment and poverty rise. -/- 3. Environmental Degradation – Overpopulation accelerates climate change, deforestation, and pollution. -/- 4. Overburdened Public Services – Governments struggle to provide adequate healthcare, education, and housing. -/- 5. Social Instability – Overcrowded cities and high competition for resources lead to crime, protests, and political unrest. -/- Case Studies: Overpopulated Countries -/- India (1.4 billion, fertility rate ~2.0) – Struggles with water shortages, traffic congestion, and high unemployment. -/- Bangladesh (170 million, fertility rate ~2.1) – One of the most densely populated countries, facing flooding, land shortages, and slums. -/- Nigeria (223 million, fertility rate ~5.3) – Rapid growth threatens food security, job opportunities, and deforestation. -/- Philippines (114 million, fertility rate ~1.9) – Faces urban congestion, limited land space, and housing crises. -/- Pakistan (240 million, fertility rate ~3.5) – Struggles with energy shortages, poor healthcare, and rising poverty. -/- The Correct Approach for Overpopulated Countries -/- Overpopulated nations must not immediately adopt replacement fertility (2.1 children per woman) because their population is already too large. Instead, they should: -/- 1. Reduce Population to a Manageable Level -/- Implement family planning programs and education initiatives to encourage lower birth rates. -/- Set fertility targets below 2.1 (e.g., 1.5 to 1.8) to gradually reduce population size. -/- Offer economic incentives for smaller families, such as tax benefits and free contraceptives. -/- 2. Strengthen Economic Growth and Increase GDP Per Capita -/- Invest in technology, high-value industries, and education to improve productivity. -/- Develop smart urban planning to reduce congestion and improve living conditions. -/- Ensure fair wages and social safety nets to prevent extreme poverty. -/- 3. Stabilize at Replacement Fertility After Achieving Balance -/- Once population levels become sustainable, shift to replacement fertility (2.1 children per woman) to prevent economic decline. -/- Encourage sustainable urbanization and green technologies to manage resources efficiently. -/- Without these measures, overpopulated countries will continue to struggle with worsening poverty, environmental destruction, and declining quality of life. -/- The Risks of Depopulation -/- While overpopulation creates challenges, depopulation also presents significant risks: -/- 1. Economic Decline – Fewer workers result in lower productivity, labor shortages, and reduced economic growth. -/- 2. Aging Populations – Fewer young people mean fewer taxpayers to support healthcare and pensions. -/- 3. Urban and Rural Decay – Population decline leads to abandoned homes, closed schools, and stagnation. -/- 4. Loss of Global Influence – Countries with shrinking populations lose economic and political power. -/- Case Studies: Depopulating Countries -/- Japan (125 million, fertility rate ~1.3) – The world’s most rapidly aging nation, relying on robotics and automation. -/- South Korea (51 million, fertility rate ~0.78) – Facing a severe birth rate crisis, threatening long-term economic stability. -/- Italy (59 million, fertility rate ~1.2) – Experiencing rural depopulation, with entire villages abandoned. -/- Germany (84 million, fertility rate ~1.4) – Uses immigration to sustain its economy but still faces a shrinking workforce. -/- China (1.4 billion, fertility rate ~1.2) – After the one-child policy, it now struggles with a declining labor force. -/- Are Depopulating Countries on the Right Path? -/- Some depopulating countries have adapted well, while others face long-term crises. -/- Countries Handling Depopulation Effectively -/- Germany – Uses skilled immigration and robotics to compensate for labor shortages. -/- Japan – Invests in automation and AI to maintain productivity despite an aging population. -/- Canada – Encourages high-skilled immigration to offset declining birth rates. -/- Countries Struggling with Depopulation -/- South Korea – Despite incentives like cash rewards and tax breaks for families, birth rates remain low. -/- Italy – Rural areas are becoming ghost towns, with little government intervention. -/- China – Ending the one-child policy has not significantly increased birth rates. -/- These countries must stabilize their population before adopting replacement fertility (2.1 children per woman) to avoid economic collapse. -/- The Correct Approach for Depopulating Countries -/- Depopulating nations should not immediately aim for replacement fertility. Instead, they must: -/- 1. First Reach a Sustainable Population Level -/- If a country’s population is declining too quickly, stabilizing at 2.1 fertility too soon will not fix the economy. -/- Governments should aim for fertility rates between 1.6 and 1.9 before transitioning to 2.1. -/- 2. Encourage Higher Fertility Gradually -/- Offer childcare subsidies, free education, and paid parental leave to make parenting more affordable. -/- Promote work-life balance so families can afford more children. -/- 3. Use Immigration to Stabilize Workforce Levels -/- Countries like Germany and Canada use skilled immigration to maintain their economies. -/- Immigration policies should attract workers in high-demand industries. -/- 4. Invest in Automation and AI -/- Japan and South Korea are leading in robotics to replace human labor shortages. -/- Automation ensures productivity remains stable, even with fewer workers. -/- By following these steps, depopulating nations can create a balanced, self-sustaining economy before adopting replacement fertility. -/- Conclusion: Achieving Population Balance for Long-Term Sustainability -/- The correct population strategy depends on a country’s demographic situation: -/- Overpopulated countries must first reduce their population and achieve high GDP per capita before stabilizing at replacement fertility. -/- Depopulating countries must first stabilize their population before transitioning to replacement fertility. -/- This approach aligns with the universal law of balance, ensuring that societies do not suffer from excessive resource depletion or economic collapse. Overpopulation and depopulation are both extreme imbalances—countries must find the middle ground for long-term prosperity. -/- By implementing these strategies, nations can build a future where economic growth, resource management, and population levels are harmonized for sustainable development. -/- . (shrink)

Un biologiste fait une découverte incompatible avec des conceptions religieuses de la vie bonne. En classe, un professeur d'université profite de son exposé magistral pour faire la promotion d'une idéologie politique. Un fonds de recherche des sciences sociales refuse de financer un projet visant à résoudre le problème de la sous-représentation des femmes en politique, affirmant qu'une telle recherche n'est pas scientifique. Tous ces exemples témoignent de l'interaction constante entre, d'une part, l'enseignement et la recherche scientifique, et d'autre part, les (...) enjeux normatifs au sein de sphères d'influence. Les sciences doivent-elles être neutres? La normativité des sciences est-elle inévitable? Et de quoi parle-t-on lorsque nous faisons référence à la neutralité scientifique? Cette entrée exposera les principales réponses à ces trois questions. Après avoir clarifié le cadre conceptuel et la problématique de cette entrée, nous explorerons les approches wébérienne et positiviste en faveur de la neutralité des sciences. Ces deux perspectives seront confrontées à divers objections, notamment celles du pragmatisme américain. En réponse à l’ethos mertonien des sciences, nous présenterons finalement la critique féministe selon laquelle les disciplines scientifiques ne peuvent pas faire l’économie d’objectifs éthiques, politiques ou sociaux. Pour des raisons de simplicité, cette entrée approfondira surtout des modèles et arguments issus de l’économie, de la biologie et des sciences de la santé, des disciplines ayant été au cœur des controverses entourant la neutralité des sciences. (shrink)

The Holistic Governance Model (HGM): A Blueprint for the Future -/- Introduction -/- Governments today face increasing challenges, from economic instability and climate change to corruption and social inequality. No single government system has fully solved these issues, but by integrating the best aspects of existing models, we can create an optimal governance system. -/- The Holistic Governance Model (HGM) is a hybrid system that combines elements from Social Democracy, Technocracy, Semi-Direct Democracy, China’s Whole-Process People’s Democracy, and the Modified Westminster (...) System. It leverages AI-driven policy-making, technocratic expertise, direct citizen participation, and long-term national planning to create a balanced, efficient, and just government system. -/- 1. Core Foundations of the Holistic Governance Model -/- The HGM is built on six fundamental pillars, ensuring that governance is efficient, democratic, and sustainable. -/- 1.1. Economic System: A Hybrid of Capitalism and State Planning -/- Inspired by: Singapore (Technocracy), China (State-Controlled Development), Nordic Model (Social Welfare), and Switzerland (Financial Stability) ✅ Key Industries Under State Control: The government regulates healthcare, energy, and transportation while allowing free-market innovation. ✅ Smart Capitalism: Entrepreneurs and businesses thrive, but AI-driven economic planning ensures fair wealth distribution. ✅ Universal Basic Assets (UBA): Instead of universal basic income (UBI), citizens receive free housing, education, and healthcare, ensuring financial security. ✅ AI-Assisted Economy: AI predicts recessions, optimizes budgets, and prevents financial crises. -/- 1.2. Political System: A Dynamic Semi-Direct Democracy -/- Inspired by: Switzerland (Direct Democracy), Westminster System (Parliament), and Singapore (Meritocratic Leadership) ✅ Two-Tier Voting System: -/- General Elections: Citizens vote for representatives every 4-5 years. -/- National Referendums: Citizens directly vote on major policies twice a year. ✅ Technocratic Advisory Board (TAB): A non-political panel of scientists, economists, and AI experts advises the government. ✅ Decentralized Local Governance: Cities and regions have autonomy while aligning with national laws. -/- 1.3. Education & Human Development: AI-Powered Lifelong Learning -/- Inspired by: Nordic Model (Free Education), Singapore (STEM Focus), and China (AI Integration) ✅ Free Public Education for Life: Every citizen has access to continuous learning, including college and skill retraining. ✅ AI-Based Personalized Learning: Students use AI tutors that adapt to their learning pace. ✅ Ethics & Critical Thinking Curriculum: Courses in philosophy, logic, and decision-making prevent misinformation and ignorance. -/- 1.4. Healthcare & Social Welfare: AI-Driven Preventive Medicine -/- Inspired by: Nordic Model (Universal Healthcare), Singapore (Tech-Driven Healthcare), and China (Mass Coverage) ✅ Government-Funded Universal Healthcare: Citizens receive free basic healthcare, with private options available. ✅ AI & Robotics in Medicine: AI diagnoses diseases early, reducing medical costs. ✅ Preventive Healthcare Policy: Citizens receive incentives for maintaining good health (fitness programs, nutrition plans). -/- 1.5. Environmental & Energy Policies: The Green Industrial Revolution -/- Inspired by: China (Renewable Energy Expansion), Nordic Model (Sustainability Laws), and Singapore (Urban Planning) ✅ Mandatory Green Technology Adoption: Businesses must comply with strict eco-friendly policies. ✅ Carbon Credit Economy: Citizens and companies earn rewards for reducing carbon footprints. ✅ 100% Renewable Energy by 2050: The government funds solar, wind, and AI-optimized energy grids. -/- 1.6. Law & Order: AI-Governed Justice & Anti-Corruption Measures -/- Inspired by: Switzerland (Independent Judiciary), Singapore (Strict Law Enforcement), and China (AI in Governance) ✅ AI-Assisted Judiciary: AI helps judges analyze case laws for fair, unbiased rulings. ✅ Zero-Corruption Policy: Public officials caught in corruption face lifetime bans from government service. ✅ Balanced Civil Rights & Security: -/- Freedom of Speech: Citizens can express opinions, but disinformation is regulated. -/- AI Surveillance for Security: AI prevents crime while protecting privacy. -/- 2. Government Structure of HGM -/- 2.1. Executive Branch: The President, Prime Minister, and Technocrats -/- President (Elected by Public Vote) → Oversees national policies and international relations. -/- Prime Minister (Elected by Parliament) → Manages daily governance. -/- Technocratic Economic Council → Expert-led economic planning. -/- AI-Assisted Policy Bureau → Uses AI for healthcare, infrastructure, and environmental policies. -/- 2.2. Legislative Branch: Semi-Direct Parliament -/- Lower House (Elected Officials) → Creates laws based on citizen participation. -/- Upper House (Experts & Regional Representatives) → Reviews laws for scientific and ethical validity. -/- Referendum System → Citizens directly vote on key national issues. -/- 2.3. Judicial Branch: AI-Assisted Supreme Court -/- Independent Court System → Ensures justice and constitutional balance. -/- AI Legal Analysis → AI helps judges analyze previous cases and evidence. -/- 3. Implementation Strategy: How to Apply HGM Worldwide -/- To implement HGM, a phased approach is needed: -/- Phase 1 (0-5 Years): Research & AI Integration -/- ✅ Establish an HGM Global Research Center to develop AI governance models. ✅ Pilot AI-assisted economic planning in select countries. -/- Phase 2 (5-10 Years): Education & Public Awareness -/- ✅ Introduce HGM-based education systems (critical thinking, AI governance). ✅ Encourage political reforms to adopt hybrid governance models. -/- Phase 3 (10-20 Years): Nationwide Policy Implementation -/- ✅ Countries gradually adopt the HGM framework, with AI monitoring national progress. ✅ Global partnerships for climate change action and digital economy growth. -/- Phase 4 (Beyond 20 Years): Global Standardization -/- ✅ Establish an HGM Alliance for international cooperation. ✅ Implement AI-driven global policies on poverty, sustainability, and digital rights. -/- 4. Why the HGM is the Future of Governance -/- The Holistic Governance Model (HGM) offers the most advanced, efficient, and democratic government system by combining AI governance, citizen participation, economic stability, and social equality. -/- Conclusion: A Government System for the 21st Century -/- The Holistic Governance Model (HGM) combines the best government systems into a single, optimized model. By implementing AI, technocracy, direct democracy, and long-term planning, HGM ensures: ✅ Efficient economic management ✅ Social equality without excessive taxation ✅ Democratic participation with AI-driven transparency ✅ Sustainable environmental policies ✅ Corruption-free governance -/- If adopted globally, HGM could transform human civilization into a more just, advanced, and sustainable society. -/- . (shrink)

Beyond Capitalism: Designing a New Economic System for Humanity -/- Introduction -/- For centuries, capitalism has been the dominant economic system, driving technological innovation, wealth creation, and global trade. However, its flaws—extreme inequality, environmental destruction, and economic instability—have made many question whether it is still the best model for humanity. Instead of reforming capitalism, perhaps the time has come to replace it entirely with a new system that better aligns with modern challenges, human well-being, and sustainability. -/- This essay explores (...) a new economic model that moves beyond capitalism and socialism, aiming for a system that is fair, sustainable, and technologically advanced. -/- Why Capitalism Must Be Replaced -/- Capitalism’s fundamental flaws make it unsustainable in the long run: -/- 1. Wealth Inequality and Economic Injustice -/- The richest 1% own more than half of the world’s wealth, while billions struggle in poverty. -/- The capitalist system prioritizes profits over people, leading to worker exploitation and economic instability. -/- 2. Environmental Collapse -/- Capitalism’s endless growth model is destroying the planet through deforestation, pollution, and climate change. -/- Corporations prioritize short-term profits over long-term sustainability. -/- 3. Automation and AI Disrupting Jobs -/- Millions of jobs are being replaced by artificial intelligence and automation. -/- The capitalist system does not account for a future where human labor is no longer essential. -/- 4. Psychological and Social Problems -/- Consumerism creates stress, anxiety, and social isolation by equating happiness with material wealth. -/- The fear of financial instability keeps people trapped in low-quality jobs and debt cycles. -/- Given these issues, capitalism is no longer fit for the future. A completely new economic system must be built—one that values sustainability, equality, and technology-driven efficiency. -/- Introducing a New Economic System: The Post-Capitalist Model -/- A new economic model must prioritize human well-being, technological efficiency, and ecological balance over profit. Below is a blueprint for a post-capitalist society. -/- 1. A Resource-Based Economy (RBE) -/- A Resource-Based Economy (RBE) is an economic model where all goods and services are freely available based on need, rather than money or trade. -/- Technology and AI manage resources efficiently, eliminating the need for money. -/- Automation handles labor, allowing people to pursue education, research, and creativity. -/- No private ownership of land or resources, only shared community access based on sustainability. -/- 2. Universal Basic Infrastructure (UBI 2.0) -/- Instead of just giving people money (UBI), a new system would provide universal basic needs, including: -/- Free housing, healthcare, education, food, and clean energy for all. -/- Advanced AI-driven logistics to distribute goods and services efficiently. -/- 3. Decentralized AI Governance -/- Rather than governments being controlled by corporations or corrupt politicians, AI and collective intelligence could ensure fair and transparent decision-making. -/- AI algorithms could optimize resource distribution, prevent waste, and eliminate financial corruption. -/- Direct democratic participation, where people vote on policies using secure blockchain systems. -/- 4. Sustainable, Circular Economy -/- Zero waste policies, where everything is recycled, reused, or repurposed. -/- Focus on degrowth—reducing unnecessary production while increasing quality of life. -/- Energy-efficient smart cities, where transportation, housing, and food production are automated. -/- 5. Post-Work Society: Emphasizing Purpose Over Jobs -/- In a post-capitalist economy, people would not be forced to work meaningless jobs just to survive. Instead: -/- People could focus on science, philosophy, arts, personal growth, and social well-being. -/- Education would be lifelong and freely available. -/- AI and robots would handle most labor, leaving humans free to explore their full potential. -/- How This System Would Solve Capitalism’s Problems -/- Challenges in Transitioning to a Post-Capitalist Economy -/- While this system solves capitalism’s biggest problems, transitioning away from capitalism would face major challenges: -/- 1. Resistance from the Wealthy Elite -/- Billionaires and corporations control most of the world’s resources and political systems. -/- They would fight to maintain power, delaying or sabotaging systemic change. -/- 2. Psychological and Cultural Shifts -/- People have been conditioned to associate money with survival and success. -/- A new system would require re-educating society on cooperation, sustainability, and shared abundance. -/- 3. Technology and Infrastructure Development -/- Large-scale AI, automation, and sustainable energy infrastructure would need global investment. -/- Governments and private companies must be convinced to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term profit. -/- The Path Forward: Steps to Build a Post-Capitalist World -/- While the transition will not happen overnight, we can begin moving toward a post-capitalist future by taking the following steps: -/- 1. Implement Universal Basic Income (UBI) Now -/- Governments can start by providing a safety net while transitioning to a money-free economy. -/- Countries like Finland and Canada are already experimenting with UBI programs. -/- 2. Expand AI and Automation for Public Good -/- AI should be used to reduce labor burdens, not to enrich corporations. -/- Governments should invest in open-source AI that benefits all of society. -/- 3. Develop Smart Cities and Circular Economies -/- Cities should be designed for zero waste, renewable energy, and efficient transportation. -/- Governments must ban planned obsolescence and require full recycling of consumer products. -/- 4. Decentralize Power Using Blockchain and Direct Democracy -/- Blockchain voting systems can eliminate election fraud and political corruption. -/- AI-assisted governance can help make fair, data-driven policy decisions. -/- 5. Redefine Education and Human Purpose -/- Schools should move away from job training and focus on creativity, science, philosophy, and social intelligence. -/- Societies should emphasize happiness, purpose, and sustainability over financial success. -/- Conclusion: A New Civilization Beyond Capitalism -/- Capitalism was a necessary stage in human evolution, but it has outlived its usefulness. The future demands a system that is more intelligent, just, and sustainable—one where: ✅ No one is forced to work just to survive. ✅ Resources are managed intelligently, not wasted for profit. ✅ Technology is used for human well-being, not corporate greed. ✅ The planet is protected, not exploited. -/- This is not utopian fantasy—it is a logical step forward in human evolution. By combining AI, automation, decentralized governance, and sustainability, we can create a post-capitalist society where everyone thrives. -/- The question Is no longer “Should we replace capitalism?” The question is: “How soon can we build a better system before capitalism destroys us all?” -/- . (shrink)

Online voting system is to be the election process carried out on the online platform without any use of traditional ballots paper and EVM. The system should be such that votes being cast by voter would not be rigged or unduly compromised in any shape or form. We are employing blockchain technology for our voting system as it provides decentralized nodes for voting and end to end verification. Blockchain technology gives high-level security and authentication to the voter. Key features of (...) free and fair Development of an electronic voting system that meets the legal needs of legislators has been a challenge for many years. Distributed ledger technologies is a new and thrilling technological innovation in the information technology sector. Blockchain technologies provide an endless number of applications that enjoy sharing economies. This paper seeks to assess the use of blockchain as service to deploy distributed electronic voting systems. The paper invokes the needs of constructing electronic voting systems and delineates the legal and technical constraints of employing block chain as a service towards the realization of such systems. (shrink)

Knowledge is one of the most important factors determining the development of global economy and overcoming the present existing inequalities. Humankind needs a fair distribution of the potential of knowledge because its big social problems and difficulties today are due to the existence of deep‐going differences in its possession and use. This paper is an attempt to analyze and present certain philosophical arguments and conceptions justifying cooperative decision‐making in the searching for fair distribution of the benefits of (...) knowledge in the globalized world. Made individually or collectively, these decisions do not worsen the status of anyone ‐ rather they can lead to the use of benefits of knowledge in the interest of all people. A fair distribution of resources and achievements of a knowledge‐based economy is of key importance for the future of humankind. There exist three significant roads to justification of cooperative decisionmaking in a global aspect. The main problem here is that of how to ensure equal access of all members of the global society to benefits of knowledge.In this paper are considered communitarianism, J. Habermas` theory of communicative action and public choice theories. The right to participate in activities of the knowledge society and to share in its wealth is related to the use of social and economic benefits. A distributive justice, including such right, could be based on communitarian political and moral values and principles. Any violation of such principles means existence of social injustice, with lasting consequences, including loss of access to natural goods, such as food and water. (shrink)

A Balanced Economic Model: The Feedback Loop Between Public and Private Sectors with MMT as a Stabilizing Mechanism -/- Introduction -/- Modern capitalism thrives on competition, profit motives, and consumer demand. However, the system is flawed because it allows extreme wealth inequality, market instability, and frequent economic crashes. Advertising, as an essential part of capitalism, manipulates consumer behavior to sustain profits. While this fuels economic growth, it also distorts the real needs of society. -/- A better alternative Is a hybrid (...) economic model where government-created jobs, social safety nets, and free public services coexist with a profit-driven private sector. The key to making this work is a feedback loop mechanism that keeps the two sectors balanced, ensuring economic stability while preventing extreme inequality and unnecessary market collapses. This essay explores how Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) can support this feedback loop economy to create a self-regulating system where both public and private sectors benefit from each other. -/- I. The Feedback Loop Between Private Companies and Government Economic Policies -/- A feedback loop mechanism is a self-regulating system where different components interact, adjust, and respond to maintain balance. In the economy, the public sector (government jobs, social safety nets, and public services) and the private sector (businesses, investments, and free markets) create a mutual dependency: -/- 1. Government Spending Creates Consumer Demand → Private Sector Growth -/- Government creates jobs with good salaries in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and technology. -/- This injects money into the economy, giving people the purchasing power to buy goods and services from private companies. -/- As demand increases, businesses grow, hire more workers, and expand operations. -/- 2. Private Sector Growth → Increases Government Revenue Without High Taxation -/- As private companies generate profits, they pay taxes and reinvest in expansion. -/- Strong consumer demand reduces the need for excessive taxation because economic growth itself funds public programs. -/- Businesses compete not only for profits but also for innovation and efficiency. -/- 3. Social Safety Nets Prevent Market Collapses -/- During recessions, government stabilizes the economy by expanding social programs (unemployment benefits, food assistance, healthcare). -/- This prevents demand from crashing, ensuring that businesses still have customers even in economic downturns. -/- As the economy recovers, government reduces spending, allowing the private sector to take the lead again. -/- This dynamic cycle ensures that economic booms and recessions are smoothed out, preventing extreme market crashes or mass unemployment. -/- II. The Role of MMT in Supporting the Feedback Loop -/- Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) provides the economic foundation for this model by proving that a sovereign government can spend money without being constrained by traditional budget rules. Unlike mainstream economic thinking, which suggests that governments must “balance the budget,” MMT argues that government spending should adjust based on economic conditions. -/- 1. Government-Backed Job Programs as an Economic Stabilizer -/- MMT allows governments to fund public jobs without relying solely on taxation. -/- If private companies cut jobs, the government can expand its workforce to absorb the unemployed. -/- When the economy stabilizes, people move back to higher-paying private jobs, reducing government spending. -/- 2. Preventing Inflation Through Resource Control -/- MMT acknowledges that inflation happens when there’s too much money chasing too few goods. -/- The government can remove excess money through targeted taxation and invest in productivity (e.g., infrastructure, education) to keep supply stable. -/- This prevents excessive inflation while keeping the economy growing. -/- 3. Continuous Money Circulation Without Debt Crises -/- Governments can print money to fund essential services, but they control inflation by investing in real production capacity (e.g., factories, renewable energy, technology). -/- This means public investment directly benefits private businesses, keeping both sectors in sync. -/- This MMT-backed feedback loop ensures that economic downturns do not lead to catastrophic business failures or mass unemployment. -/- III. The Role of Advertising in a Balanced Economic System -/- Advertising, while necessary for businesses, often manipulates consumer behavior in a way that creates artificial demand. In a feedback loop economy, advertising should be regulated to align with real consumer needs rather than exploiting psychological weaknesses. -/- 1. Ethical Advertising Policies -/- Companies should be incentivized to market based on quality and innovation rather than manipulation. -/- False advertising and monopolistic dominance should be regulated to prevent consumer exploitation. -/- 2. Consumer Education Programs -/- Public education should include critical thinking courses to help people make informed purchasing decisions. -/- This reduces the influence of manipulative advertising, ensuring that businesses compete fairly. -/- This ensures that the feedback loop remains healthy, preventing unnecessary overproduction and unsustainable consumer debt. -/- IV. Real-World Examples of a Balanced System -/- Some countries have successfully implemented elements of this feedback loop economic model: -/- Nordic Countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland) -/- Have free healthcare, education, and social safety nets while maintaining a competitive private sector. -/- Use progressive taxation to prevent extreme inequality, ensuring that economic growth benefits everyone. -/- Germany -/- Uses government-backed vocational training programs to ensure a highly skilled workforce. -/- Strong public-private partnerships help both sectors support each other dynamically. -/- Japan -/- Government plays a major role in funding research, infrastructure, and innovation, allowing private businesses to thrive. -/- Uses state-owned enterprises strategically while ensuring a competitive private market. -/- These examples prove that a properly managed hybrid model is more resilient, fair, and stable than extreme capitalism or extreme socialism. -/- V. Conclusion: A Self-Regulating Economy for the Future -/- A feedback loop economic system provides the best of both worlds: ✔ Government ensures economic stability through public job creation and social safety nets. ✔ Private companies drive innovation and competitiveness with strong consumer demand. ✔ MMT allows government spending to adjust dynamically without unnecessary austerity measures. ✔ Advertising is reformed to encourage ethical business practices and informed consumer choices. ✔ Inflation is controlled through taxation, investment, and resource management. -/- By integrating these feedback loop mechanisms, we can create a self-regulating economic model where both public and private sectors reinforce each other, ensuring long-term stability, prosperity, and economic fairness. -/- Policy Framework for a Balanced Economic System: Global Best Practices -/- To fully integrate the feedback loop mechanism between the public and private sectors, specific policies must be implemented to ensure economic stability, innovation, and fairness. Below are real-world policy examples that demonstrate how different countries successfully manage their economies using a mix of government intervention and free market principles. -/- I. Public Job Creation as an Economic Stabilizer -/- One of the biggest issues in capitalism is economic recessions leading to mass layoffs, which then reduce consumer spending, creating a vicious cycle of economic decline. The solution is public sector job programs that absorb unemployed workers during downturns and allow them to transition back to private jobs when the economy improves. -/- Global Examples -/- ✔ United States (New Deal Programs – 1930s) -/- During the Great Depression, the U.S. government created millions of jobs in construction, public works, and conservation projects. -/- These projects boosted infrastructure while providing employment, helping to revive the economy. -/- ✔ Argentina’s Jefes de Hogar Program (2002-2006) -/- Aimed at mitigating mass unemployment during Argentina’s economic crisis. -/- The government hired unemployed citizens to work in community service, infrastructure, and public health projects. -/- Created social stability and demand for private goods, helping Argentina recover. -/- ✔ Germany’s Kurzarbeit Program (Ongoing) -/- In times of economic slowdown, the German government pays companies to keep workers employed at reduced hours rather than laying them off. -/- This prevents mass unemployment, ensuring that workers still have income and spending power. -/- Policy Recommendation: → Implement automatic public employment programs during recessions to keep demand stable and prevent economic crashes. -/- II. Social Safety Nets to Support Consumer Demand -/- A strong social safety net ensures that consumers have purchasing power even in economic downturns, keeping the private sector stable. -/- Global Examples -/- ✔ Nordic Model (Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland) -/- Provides free healthcare, education, and unemployment benefits, preventing extreme poverty. -/- Funded through progressive taxation, ensuring that the wealthy contribute fairly to society. -/- This creates a stable consumer base for private companies, benefiting the entire economy. -/- ✔ Universal Basic Income (UBI) Experiments (Finland, Canada, Kenya) -/- Finland tested a UBI program where unemployed citizens received a monthly payment regardless of employment status. -/- Results showed that recipients were more likely to start businesses and find better jobs, proving that social safety nets do not reduce work incentives. -/- ✔ Singapore’s Housing and Retirement System -/- The government helps citizens buy homes with public funds, ensuring stable housing. -/- A mandatory retirement savings system (Central Provident Fund) ensures that people have money after they retire. -/- These policies reduce financial anxiety, allowing people to focus on entrepreneurship and economic growth. -/- Policy Recommendation: → Implement universal healthcare, free education, and unemployment benefits to ensure that economic downturns do not collapse consumer spending. -/- III. Regulating Advertising to Align with Consumer Needs -/- Unregulated advertising manipulates consumer behavior, creating unnecessary demand and overconsumption, which destabilizes economies. Governments can regulate advertising to ensure ethical business practices. -/- Global Examples -/- ✔ European Union (Strict Advertising Laws) -/- The EU bans false advertising, ensuring that companies cannot make misleading claims about their products. -/- Certain junk food and alcohol ads are restricted to protect public health. -/- ✔ France’s Ban on Child-Targeted Advertising -/- Prevents unethical marketing towards children, reducing unnecessary consumerism. -/- ✔ Japan’s Culture of Product Quality Over Hype -/- Japanese companies emphasize product reliability and long-term value, reducing dependence on manipulative advertising. -/- Policy Recommendation: → Implement ethical advertising regulations to prevent false marketing, predatory ads targeting vulnerable consumers, and excessive consumer debt. -/- IV. Public-Private Partnerships for Innovation and Infrastructure -/- Rather than treating the government and private sector as separate entities, a well-balanced system interconnects them through public-private partnerships (PPPs) to drive innovation. -/- Global Examples -/- ✔ Germany’s Mittelstand Model (SME Support System) -/- The German government provides long-term financial support to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are the backbone of the economy. -/- Ensures that private businesses have stable growth without excessive corporate monopolies. -/- ✔ China’s State-Led Economic Model (Strategic Government Investments) -/- The government invests heavily in infrastructure and technology, allowing private businesses to thrive with low-cost logistics and energy. -/- Balances capitalist competition with government support, ensuring stability. -/- ✔ United States (NASA & SpaceX Collaboration) -/- NASA funded SpaceX and other private space companies, leading to rapid innovation in space technology. -/- This proves that government funding can accelerate private sector breakthroughs. -/- Policy Recommendation: → Use government funding to support innovation and long-term infrastructure projects while allowing private businesses to benefit and expand. -/- V. MMT as a Tool for Economic Stability -/- Traditional economic models suggest that governments must “balance their budgets” like households, but this is a flawed concept. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) argues that sovereign nations with their own currency (like the U.S., Japan, and the UK) can create money to fund essential services without relying on debt from private banks. -/- How MMT Works in Practice -/- ✔ Japan’s National Debt Strategy -/- Japan has one of the highest debt-to-GDP ratios in the world, yet it has no financial crisis because it borrows in its own currency. -/- Instead of austerity, Japan uses public investment to maintain economic stability. -/- ✔ U.S. Stimulus During COVID-19 -/- The U.S. government printed money to send direct payments to citizens, preventing a total economic collapse. -/- Inflation was controlled by adjusting taxation and investment in production capacity. -/- ✔ EU’s Post-COVID Recovery Fund -/- The European Union used public money to stabilize industries and workers, preventing extreme recessions. -/- Policy Recommendation: → Use MMT-based strategies to fund infrastructure, social programs, and innovation, ensuring economic stability without excessive reliance on private banking debt. -/- VI. Conclusion: Creating a Self-Regulating Economy -/- A feedback loop economy that integrates public job creation, private sector competition, social safety nets, and MMT-backed fiscal policies provides a self-regulating system that ensures: -/- ✔ Stable employment and consumer demand even during economic downturns. ✔ Innovation and competition in the private sector without excessive monopolies or market crashes. ✔ Government-funded infrastructure and social programs that benefit both workers and businesses. ✔ Ethical advertising that prevents consumer exploitation and unnecessary debt. ✔ Balanced inflation control through strategic taxation and investment. -/- By combining the best policies from different global models, we can build an economic system that minimizes business bankruptcies, prevents recessions, and maximizes innovation and economic fairness. -/- . (shrink)

Ignorance as the Root Cause of All Human and Societal Problems -/- Throughout history, humanity has struggled with a wide range of issues, from poverty and war to corruption and environmental destruction. While these problems may seem complex and varied, they all share a common root cause: ignorance. Ignorance, defined as a lack of knowledge, awareness, or understanding, is the fundamental source of poor decision-making, social injustice, and systemic failures. It is the invisible force that allows harmful ideologies to persist, (...) enables exploitation by those in power, and prevents societies from achieving sustainable progress. Unless ignorance is addressed through a holistic educational approach, humanity will continue to suffer from the same recurring problems. -/- The Consequences of Ignorance -/- 1. Poor Decision-Making and Its Societal Impact -/- Ignorance leads individuals and leaders to make uninformed or irrational decisions. When people lack knowledge about critical subjects—such as economics, science, health, or governance—they are more likely to make choices that harm themselves and others. For instance, ignoring the scientific evidence behind climate change has resulted in environmental destruction, worsening natural disasters, and resource scarcity. Similarly, uninformed political decisions can lead to economic crises, social unrest, and ineffective policies that fail to address the real needs of the people. -/- 2. Manipulation and Exploitation of the Masses -/- A population that is unaware of its rights and the mechanisms of power is easily manipulated by politicians, corporations, and religious institutions. Ignorance allows corruption to thrive, as people may be unaware of the deceitful tactics used by leaders who prioritize personal gain over public welfare. For example, authoritarian regimes often exploit the ignorance of their citizens by spreading propaganda, suppressing dissent, and maintaining a false sense of national progress. Without critical thinking skills, people fall victim to misinformation, fake news, and ideological manipulation. -/- 3. Religious and Ideological Conflicts -/- History is filled with wars and conflicts rooted in religious and ideological ignorance. When individuals blindly follow dogma without questioning its validity or understanding different perspectives, intolerance and discrimination arise. Religious extremism, racial discrimination, and cultural biases are often fueled by a lack of knowledge about diversity and human unity. Ignorance fosters division among people, making it difficult to achieve peace and cooperation in society. -/- 4. Resistance to Change and Innovation -/- Ignorance creates fear of the unknown, leading societies to resist progress. Scientific discoveries and technological advancements often face opposition because people do not understand them or perceive them as threats to tradition. For example, when the printing press was invented, religious authorities opposed it because it allowed the spread of knowledge that challenged established doctrines. Today, the same resistance can be seen in debates over artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and other innovations that could improve human life but are hindered by fear and misinformation. -/- 5. Social Injustice and Discrimination -/- Ignorance perpetuates social inequalities, as people fail to recognize systemic injustices and their own biases. Racism, sexism, and class discrimination are all products of misunderstanding and misinformation. When people are unaware of the historical and social structures that create inequality, they are less likely to support policies that promote fairness and human rights. Education plays a crucial role in breaking down prejudices and fostering a more just society. -/- 6. Economic Inequality and Poverty -/- Many people remain trapped in poverty due to a lack of financial education and economic literacy. Ignorance about personal finance, investment, and economic systems prevents individuals from making informed decisions that could improve their lives. On a larger scale, nations with poorly educated populations struggle to develop sustainable economies, as corruption, mismanagement, and short-term thinking hinder progress. When citizens understand economic principles, they can demand better governance and policies that promote prosperity for all. -/- 7. Health Crises and Misinformation -/- A lack of knowledge about health and medicine leads to preventable diseases and unnecessary deaths. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, highlighted how misinformation about vaccines and treatments contributed to the spread of the virus. Ignorance about basic hygiene, nutrition, and medical science continues to be a major problem in many parts of the world. Proper education can empower individuals to take control of their health and make informed decisions that benefit society as a whole. -/- 8. Environmental Destruction -/- Ignorance about ecological balance and sustainability has led to reckless exploitation of natural resources, deforestation, pollution, and climate change. Many people do not understand the long-term consequences of their actions on the environment, resulting in irreversible damage to ecosystems. A well-informed society would prioritize sustainable living and conservation efforts to ensure the survival of future generations. -/- The Solution: A Holistic Educational System -/- To address ignorance at its root, a holistic educational system must be implemented. This system should emphasize: -/- ✅ Critical Thinking and Scientific Literacy – Teaching individuals to analyze information, recognize misinformation, and make rational decisions. ✅ The Universal Law of Balance in Nature – Educating people about how all systems must maintain equilibrium to function effectively, reducing ignorance-driven societal imbalances. ✅ Ethical Decision-Making and Governance – Training future leaders to prioritize balance and sustainability over greed and short-term gains. ✅ Artificial Intelligence and Technology Awareness – Preparing society for technological advancements to prevent exploitation and misuse. ✅ Cultural and Religious Compatibility – Ensuring that education respects religious beliefs while promoting rational and evidence-based thinking. -/- Conclusion -/- Ignorance is the invisible force that fuels human suffering, injustice, and societal collapse. Whether it manifests in poor decision-making, manipulation, resistance to progress, or environmental destruction, its consequences are undeniable. However, ignorance is not an unsolvable problem—it can be eradicated through proper education. A holistic educational system that integrates critical thinking, scientific literacy, and the universal law of balance in nature can empower individuals to make informed choices and build a more just, intelligent, and sustainable society. By addressing ignorance at its core, humanity can finally break free from the cycle of suffering and progress toward a future of true enlightenment and balance. -/- . (shrink)

The Importance of Socialist Principles in Balancing the Increasing Efficiency of Capitalism -/- Capitalism, as an economic system, thrives on innovation, competition, and efficiency. Over the centuries, it has fueled unprecedented advancements in technology, productivity, and global economic growth. However, capitalism’s focus on profit maximization and market efficiency often comes at the expense of social equity, environmental sustainability, and human well-being. This imbalance creates systemic issues such as income inequality, labor exploitation, and resource depletion. In this context, the integration of (...) socialist principles is essential to balance the increasing efficiency of capitalism and address its inherent shortcomings. -/- Mitigating Income Inequality -/- One of the most pressing consequences of capitalism’s efficiency is the widening gap between the wealthy elite and the working majority. As technological advancements increase productivity and profitability, the benefits often accumulate disproportionately to capital owners rather than laborers. Socialist principles, such as progressive taxation, wealth redistribution, and Universal Basic Income (UBI), can ensure that the gains of economic growth are shared more equitably across society. UBI, which involves providing all citizens with a guaranteed, unconditional income, offers a safety net for those displaced by automation and economic disruptions. Countries like Finland and Canada have piloted UBI programs, demonstrating its potential to reduce poverty, improve mental health, and foster economic stability by giving individuals the means to participate in the economy without fear of financial insecurity. -/- Protecting Workers’ Rights -/- Capitalism’s relentless pursuit of efficiency frequently leads to labor exploitation, such as low wages, poor working conditions, and job insecurity. Automation and artificial intelligence, while enhancing productivity, also threaten to displace millions of workers. Socialist principles emphasize the protection of workers’ rights through fair wages, safe workplaces, and collective bargaining. In Germany, for instance, co-determination policies ensure that workers have representation on corporate boards. Coupled with concepts like UBI, workers can face technological disruptions with greater resilience, as basic income offers a cushion against job displacement while they retrain or transition to new opportunities. -/- Promoting Environmental Sustainability -/- Capitalism’s focus on short-term profits often overlooks long-term environmental consequences. The pursuit of economic growth has led to overconsumption, pollution, and climate change, threatening the planet’s ecosystems and future generations. Socialist principles prioritize the common good over individual profit and advocate for sustainable development. Denmark has demonstrated this balance by integrating socialist-inspired environmental policies within its mixed economy. The country invests heavily in renewable energy and enforces strict environmental regulations. Additionally, concepts from Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) could play a crucial role in funding sustainability initiatives. MMT posits that governments with sovereign currencies can issue money to finance large-scale public projects without being constrained by budget deficits, as long as inflation remains under control. This framework could help finance green energy transitions and other critical investments needed to address climate change. -/- Ensuring Social Cohesion -/- Unbridled capitalism fosters competition and individualism, which can erode social cohesion and create divisions within society. Socialist principles, by contrast, emphasize solidarity, cooperation, and community well-being. A balanced approach to capitalism involves fostering a sense of shared responsibility for societal progress. Universal Basic Income is a key tool for enhancing social cohesion, as it guarantees a minimum standard of living for everyone, reducing inequality and poverty. For example, in Canada, the pilot UBI program in Ontario demonstrated how such initiatives could strengthen the social fabric by reducing financial stress, encouraging education, and improving health outcomes. When coupled with policies like free access to healthcare and education, socialist principles create a society where all members feel valued and supported. -/- Encouraging Ethical Capitalism with Modern Monetary Theory -/- Modern Monetary Theory provides a vital framework for ethical capitalism by allowing governments to prioritize public well-being over austerity measures. By rethinking budgetary constraints, MMT enables the funding of universal programs such as healthcare, education, and UBI. For example, New Zealand has embraced well-being-focused budgeting, prioritizing resources for mental health, child poverty reduction, and environmental protection. This approach aligns with socialist principles, ensuring that economic policies serve broader societal goals rather than simply maximizing GDP growth. MMT challenges the traditional capitalist notion that government spending must always be offset by tax revenues, opening the door for innovative social programs that benefit all. -/- Conclusion -/- While capitalism has proven to be a powerful engine for innovation and economic growth, its increasing efficiency can exacerbate systemic issues such as inequality, exploitation, and environmental degradation. Socialist principles provide a vital counterbalance, emphasizing fairness, equity, and collective responsibility. Tools like Modern Monetary Theory and Universal Basic Income further enhance the potential of socialist principles to address these challenges. Countries such as Finland, Germany, Denmark, Canada, and New Zealand exemplify how mixed economic systems can combine the strengths of capitalism with the equity of socialism. By adopting these principles, societies can create a sustainable and inclusive economic system that harnesses the strengths of capitalism while mitigating its weaknesses. In an era of rapid technological advancement and global interconnectivity, this balance is more important than ever for building a just and resilient future. -/- . (shrink)