Several quantitative studies (e.g. Kidd & Castano, 2013a; Djikic et al., 2013) have shown a positive correlation between literary reading and empathy. However, the literary nature of the stimuli used in these studies has not been defined at a more detailed, stylistic level. In order to explore the stylistic underpinnings of the hypothesized link between literariness and empathy, we conducted a qualitative experiment in which the degree of stylistic foregrounding was manipulated. Subjects (N = 37) read versions of Katherine Mansfield's (...) 'The Fly', a short story rich in foregrounding, while marking striking and evocative passages of their choosing. Afterwards, they were asked to select three markings and elaborate on their experiences in writing. One group read the original story, while the other read a 'non-literary' version, produced by an established author of suspense fiction for young adults, where stylistic foregrounding was reduced. We found that the non-literary version elicited significantly more (p < 0.05) explicitly empathic responses than the original story. This finding stands in contradiction to widely accepted assumptions in recent research, but can be assimilated in alternative models of literariness and affect in literary reading (e.g. Cupchik et al., 1998). We present an analysis of the data with a view to offering more than one interpretation of the observed effects of stylistic foregrounding. (shrink)

Reductionists about knowledge-wh hold that "s knows-wh" (e.g. "John knows who stole his car") is reducible to "there is a proposition p such that s knows that p, and p answers the indirect question of the wh-clause." Anti-reductionists hold that "s knows-wh" is reducible to "s knows that p, as the true answer to the indirect question of the wh-clause." I argue that both of these positions are defective. I then offer a new analysis of knowledge-wh as a special kind (...) of de re knowledge. (shrink)

The view that morally worthy actions must be motivated by moral knowledge faces counterexamples. This paper offers a counterexample in which Ava and Beth text a wise rabbi for answers to the same moral question, receive the same correct answer, and accordingly act rightly. Beth however receives her answer from a thief who stole the rabbi's phone and randomly chose the correct answer. Beth therefore is Gettierized and lacks moral knowledge that Ava has. But this doesn't seem to diminish the (...) moral worth of Beth's action. This is a counterexample to Paulina Sliwa and JJ Cunningham's accounts of moral worth, which require moral knowledge. (shrink)

Gold and Its Role in War, Economy, and the Shift to Fiat Currency -/- Gold has long been a symbol of wealth, power, and economic stability. Historically, it was used as money, backing national currencies and serving as a reserve asset. However, its limitations led to the shift toward fiat currency, which provides greater flexibility in managing modern economies. Gold has also played a crucial role in global conflicts, particularly World War II, where nations hoarded, looted, and traded gold to (...) finance their war efforts. Understanding the relationship between gold, war, and economic stability explains why the world moved away from the gold standard and adopted fiat money. -/- The Limitations of Gold as Money -/- While gold has been used as currency for centuries, it has several drawbacks that make it unsuitable for modern economies. First, gold is not easily divisible or portable, making everyday transactions impractical. Carrying and transferring large amounts of gold requires security and infrastructure, increasing costs. Additionally, gold supply is limited, meaning that as economies grow, the money supply cannot expand accordingly, leading to deflation and economic stagnation. -/- Gold’s price volatility also makes it a poor monetary standard. Unlike fiat money, which governments can regulate, gold’s value fluctuates based on mining output, global demand, and geopolitical events. This instability can create uncertainty in financial markets. Moreover, in today’s digital economy, gold cannot facilitate rapid, electronic transactions, making it inefficient for global trade. -/- Perhaps the most significant limitation is that a gold-based system restricts monetary policy. Governments and central banks use interest rates and money supply adjustments to manage inflation, unemployment, and economic growth. A gold standard would prevent these interventions, making financial crises harder to control. -/- Gold and Economic Conflicts -/- If gold were still the primary form of money, it could lead to major economic and geopolitical conflicts. Gold is not evenly distributed worldwide, meaning nations with larger reserves would have disproportionate financial power, potentially leading to tensions and wars over resources. -/- A gold-based economy would also increase economic instability. Countries would hoard gold during crises, reducing money circulation and triggering deflation, unemployment, and recessions. Additionally, a reliance on gold would encourage illegal mining, black markets, and corruption, further destabilizing global economies. -/- Gold’s Role in World War II -/- Gold played a crucial role in World War II, financing both the Axis and Allied powers. Nations used gold to purchase war materials, pay for military expenses, and maintain economic stability during the conflict. -/- Nazi Germany’s Gold Hoarding and Economic Warfare -/- The Third Reich relied heavily on stolen gold to finance its war machine. The Nazis: -/- Looted central bank reserves from occupied countries such as Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Belgium, and France. -/- Stole gold from individuals, especially Jewish victims of the Holocaust, by confiscating jewelry, coins, and even extracting gold from dental fillings. -/- Traded stolen gold with neutral countries, such as Switzerland, Spain, and Portugal, in exchange for vital war materials like oil, tungsten, and industrial equipment. -/- Deposited gold in Swiss banks, where it was laundered and converted into usable currency, allowing the Nazis to bypass economic sanctions. -/- Japan’s Gold Operations in Asia -/- Japan also plundered gold and resources from occupied territories in China, the Philippines, Malaya, and Indonesia. Some theories suggest Japan hid large amounts of looted gold, known as “Yamashita’s Gold”, in underground vaults in the Philippines. Like Germany, Japan used stolen gold to trade for fuel, weapons, and technology. -/- Allied Powers and Gold Reserves -/- While the Axis relied on looted gold, the Allied powers used their national gold reserves to finance their war efforts: -/- The United States and Britain backed war loans and military production with gold reserves. The U.S. used its gold stockpile to fund the Lend-Lease Program, which provided military aid to allies such as Britain, the Soviet Union, and China. -/- Britain moved its gold reserves to Canada for safekeeping, fearing a German invasion. -/- The Soviet Union used gold to purchase war materials from neutral nations, ensuring its war effort remained well-supplied. -/- Neutral countries like Switzerland, Spain, and Portugal facilitated war financing by exchanging gold for goods, often ignoring its origins. Swiss banks in particular played a key role in laundering Nazi gold, enabling Germany to continue funding its military. -/- The Shift to Fiat Currency -/- World War II demonstrated the financial instability of relying on gold, leading to major economic reforms. In 1944, the Bretton Woods Agreement established a new financial system, where the U.S. dollar was linked to gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar. This created stability in global finance. However, as economies grew, the limitations of gold-backed currency became clear. In 1971, the U.S. abandoned the gold standard, transitioning to a fully fiat currency system. -/- Fiat money allows governments to: -/- Expand the money supply to support economic growth. -/- Adjust interest rates and inflation to stabilize economies. -/- Avoid deflation and liquidity crises that plagued the gold standard. -/- Fiat currency also eliminates gold-related conflicts and reduces dependence on resource-intensive mining, benefiting both economies and the environment. -/- Conclusion -/- Gold has played a central role in economic history, from its use as money to its impact on global conflicts. While valuable, gold is impractical as modern money due to its physical limitations, deflationary risks, and geopolitical consequences. World War II showcased the dangers of gold hoarding and economic warfare, leading to the adoption of fiat currency. The transition to fiat money has enabled greater economic stability, flexibility, and global trade, making it the foundation of the modern financial system. -/- . (shrink)

Gold and Its Role in War, Economy, and the Shift to Fiat Currency -/- Gold has long been a symbol of wealth, power, and economic stability. Historically, it was used as money, backing national currencies and serving as a reserve asset. However, its limitations led to the shift toward fiat currency, which provides greater flexibility in managing modern economies. Gold has also played a crucial role in global conflicts, particularly World War II, where nations hoarded, looted, and traded gold to (...) finance their war efforts. Understanding the relationship between gold, war, and economic stability explains why the world moved away from the gold standard and adopted fiat money. -/- The Limitations of Gold as Money -/- While gold has been used as currency for centuries, it has several drawbacks that make it unsuitable for modern economies. First, gold is not easily divisible or portable, making everyday transactions impractical. Carrying and transferring large amounts of gold requires security and infrastructure, increasing costs. Additionally, gold supply is limited, meaning that as economies grow, the money supply cannot expand accordingly, leading to deflation and economic stagnation. -/- Gold’s price volatility also makes it a poor monetary standard. Unlike fiat money, which governments can regulate, gold’s value fluctuates based on mining output, global demand, and geopolitical events. This instability can create uncertainty in financial markets. Moreover, in today’s digital economy, gold cannot facilitate rapid, electronic transactions, making it inefficient for global trade. -/- Perhaps the most significant limitation is that a gold-based system restricts monetary policy. Governments and central banks use interest rates and money supply adjustments to manage inflation, unemployment, and economic growth. A gold standard would prevent these interventions, making financial crises harder to control. -/- Gold and Economic Conflicts -/- If gold were still the primary form of money, it could lead to major economic and geopolitical conflicts. Gold is not evenly distributed worldwide, meaning nations with larger reserves would have disproportionate financial power, potentially leading to tensions and wars over resources. -/- A gold-based economy would also increase economic instability. Countries would hoard gold during crises, reducing money circulation and triggering deflation, unemployment, and recessions. Additionally, a reliance on gold would encourage illegal mining, black markets, and corruption, further destabilizing global economies. -/- Gold’s Role in World War II -/- Gold played a crucial role in World War II, financing both the Axis and Allied powers. Nations used gold to purchase war materials, pay for military expenses, and maintain economic stability during the conflict. -/- Nazi Germany’s Gold Hoarding and Economic Warfare -/- The Third Reich relied heavily on stolen gold to finance its war machine. The Nazis: -/- Looted central bank reserves from occupied countries such as Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Belgium, and France. -/- Stole gold from individuals, especially Jewish victims of the Holocaust, by confiscating jewelry, coins, and even extracting gold from dental fillings. -/- Traded stolen gold with neutral countries, such as Switzerland, Spain, and Portugal, in exchange for vital war materials like oil, tungsten, and industrial equipment. -/- Deposited gold in Swiss banks, where it was laundered and converted into usable currency, allowing the Nazis to bypass economic sanctions. -/- Japan’s Gold Operations in Asia -/- Japan also plundered gold and resources from occupied territories in China, the Philippines, Malaya, and Indonesia. Some theories suggest Japan hid large amounts of looted gold, known as “Yamashita’s Gold”, in underground vaults in the Philippines. Like Germany, Japan used stolen gold to trade for fuel, weapons, and technology. -/- Allied Powers and Gold Reserves -/- While the Axis relied on looted gold, the Allied powers used their national gold reserves to finance their war efforts: -/- The United States and Britain backed war loans and military production with gold reserves. The U.S. used its gold stockpile to fund the Lend-Lease Program, which provided military aid to allies such as Britain, the Soviet Union, and China. -/- Britain moved its gold reserves to Canada for safekeeping, fearing a German invasion. -/- The Soviet Union used gold to purchase war materials from neutral nations, ensuring its war effort remained well-supplied. -/- Neutral countries like Switzerland, Spain, and Portugal facilitated war financing by exchanging gold for goods, often ignoring its origins. Swiss banks in particular played a key role in laundering Nazi gold, enabling Germany to continue funding its military. -/- The Shift to Fiat Currency -/- World War II demonstrated the financial instability of relying on gold, leading to major economic reforms. In 1944, the Bretton Woods Agreement established a new financial system, where the U.S. dollar was linked to gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar. This created stability in global finance. However, as economies grew, the limitations of gold-backed currency became clear. In 1971, the U.S. abandoned the gold standard, transitioning to a fully fiat currency system. -/- Fiat money allows governments to: -/- Expand the money supply to support economic growth. -/- Adjust interest rates and inflation to stabilize economies. -/- Avoid deflation and liquidity crises that plagued the gold standard. -/- Fiat currency also eliminates gold-related conflicts and reduces dependence on resource-intensive mining, benefiting both economies and the environment. -/- Conclusion -/- Gold has played a central role in economic history, from its use as money to its impact on global conflicts. While valuable, gold is impractical as modern money due to its physical limitations, deflationary risks, and geopolitical consequences. World War II showcased the dangers of gold hoarding and economic warfare, leading to the adoption of fiat currency. The transition to fiat money has enabled greater economic stability, flexibility, and global trade, making it the foundation of the modern financial system. -/- . (shrink)