7 found
Order:
  1.  7
    A Note on Cajetan's Theological Semantics in Response to Timothy L. Smith's Criticisms of Cajetan.Joshua P. Hochschild - 1999 - Sapientia 54 (206):367-376.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  55
    The Rest of Cajetan’s Analogy Theory: De Nominum Analogia, Chapters 4–11.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
    The influence of Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia is due largely to its first three chapters, which introduce Cajetan’s three modes of analogy: analogy of inequality, analogy of attribution, and analogy of proportionality. Interpreters typically ignore the final eight chapters, which describe further features of analogy of proportionality. This article explains this neglect as a symptom of a failure to appreciate Cajetan’s particular semantic concerns, taken independently from the question of systematizing the thought of Aquinas. After an exegesis of the neglected (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. What is Truth? From the Academy to the Vatican (Review).Joshua P. Hochschild - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 253-254.
    In a 1993 autobiographical essay, John Rist wrote: "Christianity is above all others the religion that speaks of God's presence in history, not only in the past, as in creation and in the incarnation, but continuously into the present and … through the Church into the future. Of course that does not mean that all religious and ethical advances will be made by Christians, let alone by theologians or bishops; God needs no such limitations. What it means is that Christians (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  67
    Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan’s Question? Aquinas’s Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
    Cajetan’s analogy theory is usually evaluated in terms of its fidelity to the teachings of Aquinas. But what if Cajetan was trying to answer questions Aquinashimself did not raise, and so could not help to answer? Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia can be interpreted as intending to solve a particular semantic problem: to characterize the unity of the analogical concept, so as to defend the possibility of a non-univocal term’s mediating syllogistic reasoning. Aquinas offers various semantic characterizations of analogy, saying it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  41
    Analogy, Semantics, and Hermeneutics: The “Concept Versus Judgment” Critique.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2003 - Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (2):241-260.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  20
    Words, Concepts and Things: Cajetan on the Subject of the Categories.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2001 - Dionysius 19:159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  26
    John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master (Review).Joshua P. Hochschild - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):219-220.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark