5 found
Order:
  1. Publishing Robots.Nicholas Hadsell, Rich Eva & Kyle Huitt - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    If AI can write an excellent philosophy paper, we argue that philosophy journals should strongly consider publishing that paper. After all, AI stands to make significant contributions to ongoing projects in some subfields, and it benefits the world of philosophy for those contributions to be published in journals, the primary purpose of which is to disseminate significant contributions to philosophy. We also propose the Sponsorship Model of AI journal refereeing to mitigate any costs associated with our view. This model requires (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Eternal Hell and Impaired Agency: A Reply to Marilyn Adams.Nicholas Hadsell - 2022 - Heythrop Journal 63 (5):899-906.
    The Heythrop Journal, Volume 63, Issue 5, Page 899-906, September 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Committing to Parenthood.Nicholas Hadsell - 2025 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 29 (2).
    How do adults acquire the right to parent a child? In Parenting and the Goods of Childhood, Luara Ferracioli proposes a moral commitment account of parenthood: “The parental role is best undertaken by those who morally commit to pursuing a parent-child relationship with a particular child.” In Ferracioli’s defense of the moral commitment account, she claims it can accommodate worries about whether ambivalent gestating parents count as moral parents (they should) and whether it licenses parental proliferation (it should not). Here, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Leibniz’s Horrendous and Unthinkable World: A Critique of Leibniz’s ‘Best Possible World’ Theodicy.Nicholas Hadsell - 2021 - Heythrop Journal 63 (1):57-63.
    The Heythrop Journal, Volume 63, Issue 1, Page 57-63, January 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. Kant on punishment and poverty.Nicholas Hadsell - 2024 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 62 (2):193-210.
    I offer a Kantian argument for the idea that the state lacks the authority to punish neglected, impoverished citizens when they commit crimes to cope with that neglect. Given Kant’s own commitments to the value of external freedom and the state’s obligation to ensure it in Doctrine of Right, there is no reason a Kantian state can claim authority to punish an impoverished citizen while also failing in significant ways to protect her external freedom.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark