Results for 'Winfried Löffler'

15 found
Order:
  1.  46
    Review of Ronald Loeffler, Brandom. [REVIEW]Pietro Salis - 2018 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:1-4.
    Review of the book "Brandom", by Ronald Loeffler.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  37
    Winfried Löffler. Einführung in Die Religionsphilosophie. [Introduction to Philosophy of Religion]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2006. [REVIEW]Peter Schneider - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):150--154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Protosemiotics and Physicosemiotics.Winfried Nöth - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):13-26.
    Protosemiotics is the study of the rudiments of semiosis, primarily in nature. The extension of the semiotic field from culture to nature is both necessary and possible in the framework of Peirce's semiotic theory. Against this extension, the critique of pansemiotism has been raised. However, Peirce's semiotics is not pansemiotic since it is based on the criterion of thirdness, which is not ubiquitous in nature. The paper examines the criteria of protosemiosis in the domain of physical and mechanical processes.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. Crisis of Representation?Winfried Nöth - 2003 - Semiotica 2003 (143):9-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5. Umberto Eco's Semiotic Threshold.Winfried Nöth - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
    The "semiotic threshold" is U. Eco's metaphor of the borderline between the world of semiosis and the nonsemiotic world and hence also between semiotics and its neighboring disciplines. The paper examines Eco's threshold in comparison to the views of semiosis and semiotics of C. S. Peirce. While Eco follows the structuralist tradition, postulating the conventionality of signs as the main criterion of semiosis, Peirce has a much broader concept of semiosis, which is not restricted to phenomena of culture but includes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Ecosemiotics and the Semiotics of Nature.Winfried Nöth - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):81-81.
    Ecosemiotics is the study of sign processes (semioses) in relation to the natural environment in which they occur. The paper examines the cultural, biological, and evolutionary dimensions of ecosemioses on the basis of C. S. Peirce's theory of continuity between matter and mind and investigates the ecosemiotic dimensions of natural signs. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature are distinguished from pansemiotism, and the coevolution of sign processes with their natural enviromnent is discussed as a determining factor of ecosemiosis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  7. Translation and Semiotic Mediation.Winfried Nöth - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):279-298.
    Translation, according to Charles S. Peirce, is semiotic mediation. In sign processes in general, the sign mediates between the object, which it represents, and its interpretant, the idea it evokes, the interpretation it creates, or the action it causes. To what extent does the way a translator mediates correspond to what a sign does in semiosis? The paper inquires into the parallels between the agency of the sign in semiosis and the agency of the interpreter in translation. It argues that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Sign Machines in the Framework of Semiotics Unbounded.Winfried Nöth - 2008 - Semiotica 2008 (169):319-341.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Representation in Semiotics and in Computer Science.Winfried Nöth - 1997 - Semiotica 115 (3-4):203-214.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  10. The Criterion of Habit in Peirce's Definitions of the Symbol.Winfried Nöth - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):82-93.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11. Yuri Lotman on Metaphors and Culture as Self-Referential Semiospheres.Winfried Nöth - 2006 - Semiotica 2006 (161):249-263.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Representations of Imaginary, Nonexistent, or Nonfigurative Objects.Winfried Nöth - 2006 - Cognitio 7 (2):277-291.
    According to the logical positivists, signs (words and pictures) of imaginary beings have no referent (Goodman). The semiotic theory behind this assumption is dualistic and Cartesian: signs vs. nonsigns as well as the mental vs. the material world are in fundamental opposition. Peirce’s semiotics is based on the premise of the sign as a mediator between such opposites: signs do not refer to referents, they represent objects to a mind, but the object of a sign can be existent or nonexistent, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  17
    Religious Beliefs as World-View Beliefs.Winfried Löffler - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):7.
    In this paper, I defend a moderately cognitive account of religious beliefs. Religious beliefs are interpreted as “worldview beliefs”, which I explicate as being indispensable to our everyday and scientific practice; my reading is nonetheless distinct from non-cognitivist readings of “worldview belief” which occasionally appear in the literature. I start with a brief analysis of a recent German contribution to the debate which on the one hand insists on the priority of epistemic reasons for or against religious beliefs, but on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Peircean Visual Semiotics: Potentials to Be Explored.Winfried Nöth & Isabel Jungk - 2015 - Semiotica 2015 (207):657-673.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Semiotica Jahrgang: 2015 Heft: 207 Seiten: 657-673.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  47
    Two Kinds of ’Christian Philosophy’.Winfried Löffler - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):111--127.
    It is controversial whether ”Christian Philosophy’ is a useful or even consistent notion. After providing some historical background to the problem, I will distinguish and explicate two possible understandings of ”Christian Philosophy’ which should be kept apart: a ”Thomistic’ and an ”Augustinian’ one, of which the latter has garnered more attention in the recent literature. A sketch of the most prominent current ”Augustinian’ position leads to some considerations for why a ”Thomistic’ understanding of ”Christian Philosophy’ has more to recommend it, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark