View topic on PhilPapers for more information
Related categories

3 found
Order:
More results on PhilPapers
  1. Erasmus of Rotterdam and Jan Milochovsky: Two Humanistic Conceptions of Christian Political Ethics.Vasil Gluchman - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (10):979-989.
    In his Education of a Christian Prince Erasmus applies ancient and Christian virtues to the functions of a Christian prince. Slovak humanist writer Ján Milo- chovský , who new Erasmus’s work, expanded in his Ornamentum Magistratus Politici the scope of the ethical and moral functions of a prince, focusing on three fundamental virtues: piety, justice and tolerance.The paper offers an analysis of Erasmus’s political ethics and examines the impact of the latter on the Slovak humanism of the second half of (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Erasmus: A Snapshot.Alex Voorhoeve - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 48:98-100.
    A short sketch of Erasmus' life and principal ideas.
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Ought-Implies-Can: Erasmus Luther and R.M. Hare.Charles R. Pigden - 1990 - Sophia 29 (1):2-30.
    l. There is an antinomy in Hare's thought between Ought-Implies-Can and No-Indicatives-from-Imperatives. It cannot be resolved by drawing a distinction between implication and entailment. 2. Luther resolved this antinomy in the l6th century, but to understand his solution, we need to understand his problem. He thought the necessity of Divine foreknowledge removed contingency from human acts, thus making it impossible for sinners to do otherwise than sin. 3. Erasmus objected (on behalf of Free Will) that this violates Ought-Implies-Can which he (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations