View topic on PhilPapers for more information
Related categories

2 found
Order:
More results on PhilPapers
  1. On the Use and Abuse of Teleology for Life: Intentionality, Naturalism, and Meaning Rationalism in Husserl and Millikan.Jacob Rump - 2018 - Humana Mente 11 (34).
    Both Millikan’s brand of naturalistic analytic philosophy and Husserlian phenomenology have held on to teleological notions, despite their being out of favor in mainstream Western philosophy for most of the twentieth century. Both traditions have recognized the need for teleology in order to adequately account for intentionality, the need to adequately account for intentionality in order to adequately account for meaning, and the need for an adequate theory of meaning in order to precisely and consistently describe the world and life. (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. An Analysis of the Antinomic Structure of the Relation of Being in Husserl and Its Political Implication. Yusuk - 2018 - Genshôgaku Nenpô 34:(21)-(36).
    Antinomy basically as an inherent structural tension from within the reason between rational willing toward the unconditioned and rational thinking necessarily conditioned by the rule of understanding plays a negative role in and for Kant's system to critically compass reason in limiting itself within the possibility of real experience. In Husserl, under the banner of one all-encompassing reason, antinomy takes a modified form of an ontological incommensurability between two essentially separable regions of being, i.e., between the ideal and the real; (...)
    Remove from this list   Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark