Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Efficiency and the futures market in organs.Andreas Albertsen - 2023 - Monash Bioethics Review 41 (1):66-81.
    There has been considerable debate over regulated organ markets. Especially current markets, where people sell one of their kidneys while still alive, have received increased attention. Futures markets remain an interesting and under-discussed alternative specification of a market-based solution to the organ shortage. Futures markets pertain to the sale of the right to procure people’s organs after they die. There is a wide range of possible specifications of the futures market. There are, however, some major unaddressed efficiency concerns. This article (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ethical Solutions to the Problem of Organ Shortage.Aksel Braanen Sterri, Sadie Regmi & John Harris - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):297-309.
    Organ shortage is a major survival issue for millions of people worldwide. Globally 1.2 million people die each year from kidney failure. In this paper, we critically examine and find lacking extant proposals for increasing organ supply, such as opting in and opt out for deceased donor organs, and parochial altruism and paired kidney exchange for live organs. We defend two ethical solutions to the problem of organ shortage. One is to make deceased donor organs automatically available for transplant without (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Organ Markets, Options, and an Over-Inclusiveness Objection: On Rippon’s Argument.J. Damgaard Thaysen & J. Sønderholm - forthcoming - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-6.
    Human organs available for transplant are in short supply. One way to increase the supply of organs consists in legalizing a live donor market. Such a market is, however, controversial. This article is about an objection to live donor organ markets made by Simon Rippon. Rippon’s objection is that the presence of a market option creates new social and legal pressures that harm the poor. Legalizing the option of selling your organs transforms into a harmful, and morally indefensible, social, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Unjust organ markets and why it is irrelevant that selling a kidney is the best option.Andreas Albertsen - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    An important argument against prohibiting organ sales is that it removes the best option available to individuals in dire circumstances. However, this line of reasoning fails to recognise that selling a kidney on a regulated market is only the best option in a very narrow comparison, where a regulated organ market is compared with banning organ sales. Once we acknowledge this narrowness, selling a kidney is not the best option. This paves the way for a distributive justice-based critique of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Morality of Kidney Sales: When Caring for the Seller’s Dignity Has Moral Costs.Alexander Reese & Ingo Pies - 2023 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 20 (1):139-152.
    Kidney markets are prohibited in principle because they are assumed to undermine the seller’s dignity. Considering the trade-off between saving more lives by introducing regulated kidney markets and preserving the seller’s dignity, we argue that it is advisable to demand that citizens restrain their own moral judgements and not interfere with the judgements of those who are willing to sell a kidney. We also argue that it is advisable not only to limit the political implications of the moral argument of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • No Man (or Woman) Is an Island?Michael A. Ashby - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (3):315-317.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation