Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How to define: a tutorial.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Princípios 13 (19):05-30.
    Practical methods are introduced for the construction of definitions, both for philosophical purposes and for uses in other disciplines. The structural and contentual requirements on definitions are clarified. It is emphasized that the development of a definition should begin with careful choice of a primary definiendum, followed by the selection of appropriate variables for the definition. Two methods are proposed for the construction of the definiens, the case list method and the method of successive improvements. Four classes of concepts are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Thomas versus Thomas: A new approach to Nagel's bat argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):377-395.
    i l l ustrat es t he di ffi cul t y of providing a purely physical characterisation of phenomenal experi ence wi t ha vi vi d exampl e about a bat ’ s sensory apparatus. Whi l e a number of obj ect i ons have al ready been made to Nagel.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Omniscience and a 'Set of All Truths': A Reply to Bringsjord.Patrick Grim - 1990 - Analysis 50 (4):271 - 276.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The second epistemic way.Billy Joe Lucas - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):107 - 114.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Fission theories of Original Guilt.Nikk Effingham - 2022 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 92 (1):15-30.
    One reading of the Doctrine of Original Sin has it that we are guilty of a sin committed by Adam, thousands of years ago. Fission theorists account for this by saying that Adam fissioned after he sinned and that each of us is one of his ‘fission successors’. This paper recaps the current discussion in the literature about this theory, arguing that the proposed version does not work for reasons already raised by Rea and Hudson. I then introduce a new (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark