Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Die innere Dynamik von selbst- und umweltbezogenen Tugenden im tugendhaften Akteur. Systematische Überlegungen im Ausgang von Erich Fromm.Richard Friedrich Runge - 2022 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 5 (1):37-59.
    Die eudaimonistische Tugendethik sieht sich, was ihre innere Struktur anbelangt, standardmäßig mit den Vorwürfen des Egoismus und Anthropozentrismus konfrontiert, was auch das Projekt einer ökologischen Tugendethik zu gefährden scheint. Der vorliegende Artikel versucht, ausgehend von der Tugendethik Erich Fromms, eine neue Perspektive auf diese Standardvorwürfe zu entwickeln, indem er den theoretischen Implikationen nachgeht, die die Anerkennung der Biophilie – der Liebe zum Leben – als eine der Tugenden des Menschen für den Frommschen Ansatz hat. Die zunächst noch exegetisch ausgerichtete Diskussion (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Constructing a Good Life.Micah Lott - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (3):363-375.
    _ Source: _Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 363 - 375 In _The Value of Living Well,_ Mark LeBar develops a position that he calls “virtue eudaimonism”. VE is both a eudaimonistic theory of practical reasoning and a constructivist account of the metaphysics of value. In this essay, I will explain the core of LeBar’s view and focus on two issues, one concerning VE ’s eudaimonism and the other concerning VE ’s constructivism. I will argue that, as it stands, VE does (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Agency, Patiency, and The Good Life: the Passivities Objection to Eudaimonism.Micah Lott - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):773-786.
    Many contemporary eudaimonists emphasize the role of agency in the good life. Mark LeBar, for example, characterizes his own eudaimonist view this way: “It is agentist, not patientist, because it emphasizes that our lives go well in virtue of what we do, rather than what happens, to us or otherwise”. Nicholas Wolterstorff, however, has argued that this prioritizing of agency over patiency is a fatal flaw in eudaimonist accounts of well-being. Eudaimonism must be rejected, Wolterstorff argues, because many life-goods are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Eudaimonism and the Ground of Normative Reasons.Kevin Jung - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (1):84-102.
    Journal of Religious Ethics, Volume 50, Issue 1, Page 84-102, March 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Excellence‐Prior Eudaimonism.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (1):68-93.
    Eudaimonism is often regarded as egoistic. If it recommends that agents pursue their own good because it is their own good, it is guilty as charged. But excellence‐prior eudaimonism offers a non‐egoistic alternative to this welfare‐prior eudaimonism. Excellence‐prior eudaimonism recommends that an agent live in a way that is in fact good for the agent, but it does not regard the agent’s own good as necessarily that for the sake of which the agent acts, nor does it regard living well (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Altruistic Eudaimonism and the Self-Absorption Objection.Jeff D’Souza - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 55 (3):475-490.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark