Switch to: References

Citations of:

Bystanding and Climate Change

Environmental Values 21 (4):397-416 (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Human Cost of Anthropogenic Global Warming: Semi-Quantitative Prediction and the 1,000-Tonne Rule.Richard Parncutt - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:471526.
    Greenhouse-gas emissions are indirectly causing future deaths by multiple mechanisms. For example, reduced food and water supplies will exacerbate hunger, disease, violence, and migration. How will anthropogenic global warming (AGW) affect global mortality due to poverty around and beyond 2100? Roughly, how much burned fossil carbon corresponds to one future death? What are the psychological, medical, political, and economic implications? Predicted death tolls are crucial for policy formulation, but uncertainty increases with temporal distance from the present and estimates may be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Moderate Emissions Grandfathering.Carl Knight - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (5):571-592.
    Emissions grandfathering holds that a history of emissions strengthens an agent’s claim for future emission entitlements. Though grandfathering appears to have been influential in actual emission control frameworks, it is rarely taken seriously by philosophers. This article presents an argument for thinking this an oversight. The core of the argument is that members of countries with higher historical emissions are typically burdened with higher costs when transitioning to a given lower level of emissions. According to several appealing views in political (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Seeking Sustainability.Clive L. Spash - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (1):1-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Collective Environmental Virtue.David Clowney - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (3):315-333.
    I propose a notion of collective virtue that makes it easier to understand environmental harm, our biggest collective-action problem, as a moral problem for which we are all responsible. Following Larry May and Gregory Mellema, I distinguish individual from shared and from collective responsibility. I then introduce parallel distinctions between individual, shared and collective character. I explore the interaction between character traits at the individual and group levels, and finally show how these distinctions help to clarify how responsibility for collective (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Equity, Ethics and Evidence in Environmental Governance.Claudia Carter - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (5):561-566.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Individuals’ Contributions to Harmful Climate Change: The Fair Share Argument Restated.Christian Baatz & Lieske Voget-Kleschin - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (4):569-590.
    In the climate ethics debate, scholars largely agree that individuals should promote institutions that ensure the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This paper aims to establish that there are individual duties beyond compliance with and promotion of institutions. Duties of individuals to reduce their emissions are often objected to by arguing that an individual’s emissions do not make a morally relevant difference. We challenge this argument from inconsequentialism in two ways. We first show why the argument also seems to undermine (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Managing Climate Change: Shifting Roles for NGOs in the Climate Negotiations.Chandra Lal Pandey - 2015 - Environmental Values 24 (6):799-824.
    Non-governmental organisations have been playing a significant role in the formation and implementation of global climate change policies. The incremental participation of non-governmental organisations in climate change negotiations is significant for two reasons: 1) they provide governments with expertise and information; and 2) they help to bridge the lack of democracy and legitimacy in global environmental governance. The fulfilment of these two functions, however, is surrounded by doubts, as very little progress has been made so far in combating climate change. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Price of Everything/Value of Nothing.Mark Whitehead - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (3):249-252.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response and Responsibility.Clive L. Spash - 2012 - Environmental Values 21 (4):391-396.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations