- Definitions in law.Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 2:199-217.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The oldest extant rhetorical contribution to the study of fallacies (cicero). [REVIEW]Antoine Braet - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (4):416 - 433.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
What There is Left and How It Works: Ancient Rhetoric and the Semiotics of Law. [REVIEW]Miklós Könczöl - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (4):399-410.details
|
|
Statvs_ Theory and cicero's Defence of Teaching in _Orator 140–8.Rosalie Stoner - 2023 - Classical Quarterly 73 (2):693-698.details
|
|
A Legal Semiotics Framework for Exploring the Origins of Hermagorean Stasis.Charles Marsh - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):11-29.details
|
|
Issues in common law pleading and ancient rhetoric.Sebastian T. McEvoy - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):245-261.details
|
|
Law, Fact and Narratives in Ancient Rhetoric: The Case of the causa Curiana. [REVIEW]Miklós Könczöl - 2008 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 21 (1):21-33.details
|
|
Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.Mark Aakhus & Marcin Lewiński - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):179-207.details
|
|
On the origin of normative argumentation theory: The paradoxical case of the Rhetoric to Alexander. [REVIEW]AntoineC Braet - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (3):347-359.details
|
|