Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Clinical and Organizational Ethics: Challenges to Methodology and Practice.Mark J. Cherry - 2020 - HEC Forum 32 (3):191-197.
    The day-to-day work of clinical ethics consultants and healthcare ethics committees can easily become overly routine. Too much routine, however, comes with a risk that morally important practices will be reduced to mere bureaucratic formalities, while practitioners become desensitized to ethically significant distinctions between cases. Clinical ethics consultation and organizational ethics must be set within the broader social and cultural context of the healthcare environment. This practice requires looking beyond mere legal compliance and the routinely false assumption that there are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Unauthorized Pelvic Exams are Sexual Assault.Perry Hendricks & Samantha Seybold - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (4):368-376.
    The pelvic exam is used to assess the health of female reproductive organs and so involves digital penetration by a physician. However, it is common practice for medical students to acquire experience in administering pelvic exams by performing them on unconscious patients without prior authorization. In this article, we argue that such unauthorized pelvic exams (UPEs) are sexual assault. Our argument is simple: in any other circumstance, unauthorized digital penetration amounts to sexual assault. Since there are no morally significant differences (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Introduction: Special Issue on Undergraduate Medical Education in Ethics and Professionalism.Brian H. Childs & Nasser Rizvi - 2020 - HEC Forum 32 (2):77-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Medical necessity and consent for intimate procedures.Brian D. Earp & Lori Bruce - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (9):591-593.
    This issue considers the ethics of a healthcare provider intervening into a patient’s genitalia, whether by means of cutting or surgery or by ‘mere’ touching/examination. Authors argue that the permissibility of such actions in the absence of a relevant medical emergency does not primarily turn on third-party judgments of expected levels of physical harm versus benefit, or on related notions such as extensiveness or invasiveness; rather, it turns on the patient’s own consent. To bolster this argument, attention is drawn to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New Findings on Unconsented Intimate Exams Suggest Racial Bias and Gender Parity.Lori Bruce, Ivar R. Hannikainen & Brian D. Earp - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (2):7-9.
    Hastings Center Report, Volume 52, Issue 2, Page 7-9, March‐April 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Should medical students perform pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without explicit consent?Chloe Bell & Nathan Emmerich - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (3):230-234.
    There have been many reports of medical students performing pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without the necessary consent being provided or even sought. These cases have led to an ongoing discussion regarding the need to ensure informed consent has been secured and furthermore, how it might be best obtained. We consider the importance of informed consent, the potential harm to both the patient and medical student risked by the suboptimal consent process, as well as alternatives to teaching pelvic examinations within (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark