- Curiosity and Uncertainty Resolution: Inflating the Perceived Utility of Genetic Information.Rémy Furrer, Dorit Barlevy, Stacey Pereira & Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):53-55.details
|
|
Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel.Zümrüt Alpinar-Sencan, Silke Schicktanz, Natalie Ulitsa, Daphna Shefet & Perla Werner - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11):861-867.details
|
|
Differences in Conceptual Understanding of the “Actionability” of Incidental Findings and the Resultant Difference in Ethical Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Japan.Tomohide Ibuki, Keiichiro Yamamoto & Kenji Matsui - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (3):187-194.details
|
|
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.Jacqueline Savard, Chriselle Hickerton, Sylvia A. Metcalfe, Clara Gaff, Anna Middleton & Ainsley J. Newson - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (1):63-76.details
|
|
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.Wendy Elizabeth Bonython & Bruce Baer Arnold - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11):787-789.details
|
|
“I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.Manuel Schaper, Sabine Wöhlke & Silke Schicktanz - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):31-40.details
|
|
Defining Ourselves: Personal Bioinformation as a Tool of Narrative Self-Conception.Emily Postan - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):133-151.details
|
|
Breaching Confidentiality in Genetic and Non-Genetic Cases: Two Problematic Distinctions.Madison K. Kilbride - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-13.details
|
|
Is It Just for a Screening Program to Give People All the Information They Want?Lisa Dive, Isabella Holmes & Ainsley J. Newson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):34-42.details
|
|
Going Back to Basics: What is the Target of Prenatal Screening?Anne-Marie Laberge, Marie-Christine Roy, Erika Kleiderman & Vardit Ravitsky - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3):50-52.details
|
|
Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.Manuel Schaper & Silke Schicktanz - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):1-11.details
|
|
The Impact of Incidental Findings Detected During Brain Imaging on Research Participants of the Rotterdam Study: An Interview Study.Charlotte H. C. Bomhof, Lisa van Bodegom, Meike W. Vernooij, Wim Pinxten, Inez D. de Beaufort & Eline M. Bunnik - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (4):542-556.details
|
|
Do genomic tests enhance autonomy?Eline M. Bunnik - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):315-316.details
|
|
Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions.Michelle Taylor-Sands & Hilary Bowman-Smart - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (Suppl 1):82-102.details
|
|
On the personal utility of Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarker testing in the research context.Eline M. Bunnik, Edo Richard, Richard Milne & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):830-834.details
|
|
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.Michele Loi - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (9):574-577.details
|
|
Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.Matthew Wai Heng Chung & Joseph Chi Fung Ng - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (10):649-652.details
|
|
Exploring neurologists’ perspectives on the return of next generation sequencing results to their patients: a needed step in the development of guidelines.Thierry Hurlimann, Iris Jaitovich Groisman & Béatrice Godard - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):81.details
|
|