Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bounding and Nonbounding Minimal Pairs in the Enumeration Degrees.S. Barry Cooper, Angsheng Li, Andrea Sorbi & Yue Yang - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):741 - 766.
    We show that every nonzero $\Delta _{2}^{0}$ e-degree bounds a minimal pair. On the other hand, there exist $\Sigma _{2}^{0}$ e-degrees which bound no minimal pair.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Cupping and noncupping in the enumeration degrees of ∑20 sets.S. Barry Cooper, Andrea Sorbi & Xiaoding Yi - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (3):317-342.
    We prove the following three theorems on the enumeration degrees of ∑20 sets. Theorem A: There exists a nonzero noncuppable ∑20 enumeration degree. Theorem B: Every nonzero Δ20enumeration degree is cuppable to 0′e by an incomplete total enumeration degree. Theorem C: There exists a nonzero low Δ20 enumeration degree with the anticupping property.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Embedding finite lattices into the Σ20 enumeration degrees.Steffen Lempp & Andrea Sorbi - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):69-90.
    We show that every finite lattice is embeddable into the Σ 0 2 enumeration degrees via a lattice-theoretic embedding which preserves 0 and 1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Noncappable enumeration degrees below 0'e. [REVIEW]S. Barry Cooper & Andrea Sorbi - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (4):1347 - 1363.
    We prove that there exists a noncappable enumeration degree strictly below 0' e.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Strong Enumeration Reducibilities.Roland Sh Omanadze & Andrea Sorbi - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (7):869-912.
    We investigate strong versions of enumeration reducibility, the most important one being s-reducibility. We prove that every countable distributive lattice is embeddable into the local structure $L(\mathfrak D_s)$ of the s-degrees. However, $L(\mathfrak D_s)$ is not distributive. We show that on $\Delta^{0}_{2}$ sets s-reducibility coincides with its finite branch version; the same holds of e-reducibility. We prove some density results for $L(\mathfrak D_s)$ . In particular $L(\mathfrak D_s)$ is upwards dense. Among the results about reducibilities that are stronger than s-reducibility, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Bounded enumeration reducibility and its degree structure.Daniele Marsibilio & Andrea Sorbi - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):163-186.
    We study a strong enumeration reducibility, called bounded enumeration reducibility and denoted by ≤be, which is a natural extension of s-reducibility ≤s. We show that ≤s, ≤be, and enumeration reducibility do not coincide on the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\Pi^0_1}$$\end{document} –sets, and the structure \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\boldsymbol{\mathcal{D}_{\rm be}}}$$\end{document} of the be-degrees is not elementarily equivalent to the structure of the s-degrees. We show also that the first order theory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The structure of the s -degrees contained within a single e -degree.Thomas F. Kent - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):13-21.
    For any enumeration degree let be the set of s-degrees contained in . We answer an open question of Watson by showing that if is a nontrivial -enumeration degree, then has no least element. We also show that every countable partial order embeds into . Finally, we construct -sets A and B such that B≤eA but for every X≡eB, XsA.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Immunity properties and strong positive reducibilities.Irakli O. Chitaia, Roland Sh Omanadze & Andrea Sorbi - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (3-4):341-352.
    We use certain strong Q-reducibilities, and their corresponding strong positive reducibilities, to characterize the hyperimmune sets and the hyperhyperimmune sets: if A is any infinite set then A is hyperimmune (respectively, hyperhyperimmune) if and only if for every infinite subset B of A, one has \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\overline{K}\not\le_{\rm ss} B}$$\end{document} (respectively, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\overline{K}\not\le_{\overline{\rm s}} B}$$\end{document}): here \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\le_{\overline{\rm (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bounded query classes and the difference hierarchy.Richard Beigel, William I. Gasarch & Louise Hay - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 29 (2):69-84.
    LetA be any nonrecursive set. We define a hierarchy of sets (and a corresponding hierarchy of degrees) that are reducible toA based on bounding the number of queries toA that an oracle machine can make. WhenA is the halting problemK our hierarchy of sets interleaves with the difference hierarchy on the r.e. sets in a logarithmic way; this follows from a tradeoff between the number of parallel queries and the number of serial queries needed to compute a function with oracleK.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • In memoriam: Barry Cooper 1943–2015.Andrew Lewis-Pye & Andrea Sorbi - 2016 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):361-365.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Cupping and noncupping in the enumeration degrees of∑< sub> 2< sup> 0 sets.S. Barry Cooper, Andrea Sorbi & Xiaoding Yi - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (3):317-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations