Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ethics in bioethics.Udo Schüklenk - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (5):iii–iii.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees.L. Williamson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):357-360.
    Bioethicists have recently expressed concern over a lack of quality control within the field. This apprehension focuses on bioethics expanding in ways that obscure its distinctive ethical remit and the specialist reasoning skills it requires. This thesis about the quality and conduct of bioethics may have particular relevance for clinical ethics. As one of the youngest offshoots of bioethics, the field focuses on the ethical issues that arise specifically in a clinical context. However, non-ethics specialists are increasingly involved in this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Generative AI and the Foregrounding of Epistemic Injustice in Bioethics.Calvin Wai-Loon Ho - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):99-102.
    OpenAI’s Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer (ChatGPT), Google’s Bard and other generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies can greatly enhance the capability of healthcare profess...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Epistemological Danger of Large Language Models.Elise Li Zheng & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):102-104.
    The potential of ChatGPT looms large for the practice of medicine, as both boon and bane. The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in platforms such as ChatGPT raises critical ethical questions of w...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Anything new under the sun? Insights from a history of institutionalized AI ethics.Simone Casiraghi - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (2):1-14.
    Scholars, policymakers and organizations in the EU, especially at the level of the European Commission, have turned their attention to the ethics of (trustworthy and human-centric) Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, there has been little reflexivity on (1) the history of the ethics of AI as an institutionalized phenomenon and (2) the comparison to similar episodes of “ethification” in other fields, to highlight common (unresolved) challenges.Contrary to some mainstream narratives, which stress how the increasing attention to ethical aspects of AI is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice.Rachel Fabi & Daniel S. Goldberg - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1):6-13.
    If funding allocation is an indicator of a field’s priorities, then the priorities of the field of bioethics are misaligned because they perpetuate injustice. Social justice mandates priority for the factors that drive systematic disadvantage, which tend not to be the areas supported by funding within academic bioethics. Current funding priorities violate social justice by overemphasizing technologies that aim to enhance the human condition without addressing underlying structural inequalities grounded in racism, and by deemphasizing areas of inquiry most frequently pursued (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The Shortage of Malaysian Stem Cell Ethics in Mainstream Database: a Preliminary Study.Gopalan Nishakanthi - 2019 - Asian Bioethics Review 11 (4):437-460.
    Ethics is a philosophical branch of inquiry that reasons between what is right and wrong. The moral philosophy of Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato from ancient Greek became the basis of most of the western ethics. These days, ethics can be divided based on its inquiries for example, normative, descriptive, metaethics, and applied ethics or based on its theories like utilitarianism, emotivism, and universal ethics. In context with applied ethics that examines issues involving emerging technologies, this study will look into the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support.Eva M. Van Baarle, Marieke C. Potma, Maria E. C. van Hoek, Laura A. Hartman, Bert A. C. Molewijk & Jelle L. P. van Gurp - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundVarious forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a responsive evaluation design has been implemented. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other’s health care organizations. This study presents a qualitative evaluation of this Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) project.MethodsCES (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Do junior academic bioethicists have an obligation to be activists?Greg Moorlock - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (8):922-930.
    Activism and bioethics have enjoyed a somewhat strained relationship. In this paper, I consider activism specifically from the perspective of junior academics. I will argue that although there may be a prima facie duty for bioethicists to be activists, countervailing considerations for junior academics may mean that they, in particular, should refrain from undertaking activist activities. I will argue this on the basis of two key claims. First, I argue that activism may come at a potential cost to the academics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The epistemic costs of compromise in bioethics.Katrien Devolder & Thomas Douglas - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (2):111-118.
    Bioethicists sometimes defend compromise positions, particularly when they enter debates on applied topics that have traditionally been highly polarised, such as those regarding abortion, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research. However, defending compromise positions is often regarded with a degree of disdain. Many are intuitively attracted to the view that it is almost always problematic to defend compromise positions, in the sense that we have a significant moral reason not to do so. In this paper, we consider whether this common (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Normative approaches and activism in global bioethics.Bert Gordijn & Henk ten Have - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):293-294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research.Angeliki Kerasidou & Michael Parker - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):214-226.
    Biomedical research is an increasingly multidisciplinary activity bringing together a range of different academic fields and forms of expertise to investigate diseases that are increasingly understood to be complex and multifactorial. Recently the discipline of ethics has been starting to find a place in large-scale biomedical collaborations. In this article we draw from our experience of working with the Malaria Genomic Epidemiology Network and other research projects to reflect upon the integration of ethics into biomedical research. We examine the way (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On Human Rights in Healthcare: Some Remarks on Limits of the Right to Healthcare.Jonas Juškevičius & Janina Balsienė - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):95-110.
    Notwithstanding the expectations related to the ‘invasion’ of human rights into the field of healthcare, the complexity of this field raises some problematic questions about the applicability of such a legal instrument. The present paper analyses the possible limits to the content of the core right to healthcare. These limits are discussed through the examination of two normative pillars of health law: the right to individual self-determination (or the principle of individual autonomy) and the right to healthcare itself. The authors (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Considering virtue: public health and clinical ethics.Karen M. Meagher - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):888-893.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations