Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education. [REVIEW]Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Michael D. Mumford & Shane Connelly - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):883-912.
    Increased investment in ethics education has prompted a variety of instructional objectives and frameworks. Yet, no systematic procedure to classify these varying instructional approaches has been attempted. In the present study, a quantitative clustering procedure was conducted to derive a typology of instruction in ethics education. In total, 330 ethics training programs were included in the cluster analysis. The training programs were appraised with respect to four instructional categories including instructional content, processes, delivery methods, and activities. Eight instructional approaches were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.E. Michelle Todd, Logan L. Watts, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Brett S. Torrence, Megan R. Turner, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1719-1754.
    Despite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses. The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Clinical Ethics Services - Facts and critical Appraisal.Andrea Dörries, Alfred Simon & Georg Marckmann - 2015 - Ethik in der Medizin 27 (3):249-253.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?Keymanthri Moodley, Siti Mukaumbya Kabanda, Leza Soldaat, Anita Kleinsmidt, Adetayo Emmanuel Obasa & Sharon Kling - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-10.
    Background Clinical Ethics Committees are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal CECs in Africa to raise awareness of and to encourage the establishment of CECs or Clinical Ethics Consultation Services on the continent. Methods A descriptive study was undertaken using an online questionnaire via SunSurveys to survey healthcare professionals and bioethicists in Africa. Data (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What Quality Is Actually Assessed Within Written Records?Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):48-50.
    We congratulate Pearlman and colleagues (2016) on their detailed account of the development of a quality assessment tool for clinical ethics consultation (CEC), based on the evaluation of written r...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark