- Notes on the Descriptive and the Normative in Kuhn.Howard Sankey - manuscriptdetails
|
|
Cosmological Realism.David Merritt - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):193-208.details
|
|
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing.Daniel J. Dunleavy - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-27.details
|
|
Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19.Karim Bschir & Simon Lohse - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-26.details
|
|
The Ambiguous Legacy of Kuhn's Structure for Normative Philosophy of Science.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2024 - In K. Brad Wray (ed.), Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions at 60. Cambridge University Press. pp. 217-234.details
|
|
Feyerabend’s rule and dark matter.David Merritt - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):8921-8942.details
|
|
O anarquismo e o estímulo à inovação científica.Bruno Camilo de Oliveira - 2021 - Inovação Na Educação Superior Brasileira: Metodologia E Casos.details
|
|
Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-16.details
|
|
Reconstructing rational reconstructions: on Lakatos’s account on the relation between history and philosophy of science.Thodoris Dimitrakos - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-29.details
|
|
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6053-6084.details
|
|
“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests.Eric C. Martin - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-33.details
|
|
Kuhn, Coherentism and Perception.Howard Sankey - 2023 - In Pablo Melogno, Hernán Miguel & Leandro Giri (eds.), Perspectives on Kuhn: Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn. Springer. pp. 1-14.details
|
|
hacia una filosofía de la ciencia centrada en prácticas.Sergio F. Martinez - 2015 - Mexico: UNAM-Bonilla Artigas.details
|
|
(1 other version)An immanent criticism of Lakatos' account of the ‘degenerating phase’ of Bohr's atomic theory.Hans Radder - 1982 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):99-109.details
|
|
Las tensiones de la estructura de las revoluciones científicas y el legado de Thomas Kuhn.Leonardo Díaz - 2011 - Endoxa 27:251.details
|
|
(1 other version)Paul Karl Feyerabend's Relativism.Teresa Gargiulo - 2016 - Ideas Y Valores 65 (160):95-120.details
|
|
Reasons for relativism: Feyerabend on the ‘Rise of Rationalism’ in ancient Greece.Helmut Heit - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57:70-78.details
|
|
‘Paradigms lost, or the world regained’ —An excursion into realism and idealism in science.Robert Nola - 1980 - Synthese 45 (3):317-350.details
|
|
Immanent philosophy of X.Robin Hendry - unknowndetails
|
|
Paul Karl Feyerabend. En Defensa de la Continuidad de su Pensamiento.Teresa Gargiulo - 2015 - Trans/Form/Ação 38 (2):129-161.details
|
|
A Tale of Three Theories: Feyerabend and Popper on Progress and the Aim of Science.Luca Tambolo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:33-41.details
|
|
Reconsidering the Carnap-Kuhn Connection.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.details
|
|
The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):169-177.details
|
|
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.details
|
|
Feyerabend's Rationalism.Andrew Lugg - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):755 - 775.details
|
|
Popper, Refutation and 'Avoidance' of Refutation.Greg Bamford - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Queenslanddetails
|
|
How Successful is Naturalism?Georg Gasser (ed.) - 2007 - Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.details
|
|
(1 other version)Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.details
|
|
Overdetermined problems in science.Andrew Lugg - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (1):1-18.details
|
|
Genetic Epistemology and Piaget's Philosophy of Science: Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2006 - Theory and Psychology 16 (2):203-224.details
|
|
In defense of Bacon.Alan Soble - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):192-215.details
|
|
For and against method. [REVIEW]Noretta Koertge - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):274-290.details
|
|
Kuhn and the quantum controversy. [REVIEW]Peter Galison - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):71-85.details
|
|
Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):759-774.details
|
|
Paul Feyerabend und Thomas Kuhn.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):61-83.details
|
|
Karl Popper’s Philosophical Breakthrough.Stefano Gattei - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):448-466.details
|
|
El enfoque histórico filosófico y la didáctica de la ciencia – A 60 años de la publicación de La estructura de las revoluciones científicas.Ginnobili Santiago - 2022 - Revista De Educación En Biología 25 (2):3-21.details
|
|
Between Kin Selection and Cultural Relativism: Cultural Evolution and the Origin of Inequality.William T. Lynch - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (2):278-315.details
|
|
The diversity of modes of discourse and the development of sociological knowledge.Nico Stehr & Anthony Simmons - 1979 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10 (1):141-161.details
|
|
The Scientific Discovery of ‘Natural Capital’: The Production of Catalytic Antibodies.Michael Ben-Chaim - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (3):413-433.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Selective Bibliography.Achinstein Peter, Ackermann Robert, E. Agazzi, W. K. Ahn, S. Allén & Andersen Hanne - 2002 - Cognition 69:135-178.details
|
|
El cambio en el concepto de incommensurabilidad de Kuhn.Howard Sankey - 2010 - Cuadernos de Epistemologia 4:11-31.details
|
|
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.details
|
|
State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.details
|
|
From the method of proofs and refutations to the methodology of scientific research programmes.Gábor Forrai - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):161-175.details
|
|
Against incommensurability.Michael Devitt - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):29-50.details
|
|
More clothes from the emperor's bargain basement. [REVIEW]Paul K. Feyerabend - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):57-71.details
|
|
(1 other version)An immanent criticism of Lakatos' account of the 'degenerating phase' of Bohr's atomic theory.Hans Radder - 1982 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):99-109.details
|
|
Historical self-understanding in the social sciences: The use of Thomas Kuhn in psychology.Gerald L. Peterson - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (1):1–30.details
|
|
Will the Popperian Feyerabend please step forward: Pluralistic, Popperian themes in the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend.Robert P. Farrell - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.details
|
|