Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Well-Ordered Science and Public Trust in Science.Gürol Irzik & Faik Kurtulmus - forthcoming - Synthese.
    Building, restoring and maintaining well-placed trust between scientists and the public is a difficult yet crucial social task requiring the successful cooperation of various social actors and institutions. Philip Kitcher’s takes up this challenge in the context of liberal democratic societies by extending his ideal model of “well-ordered science” that he had originally formulated in his. However, Kitcher nowhere offers an explicit account of what it means for the public to invest epistemic trust in science. Yet in order to understand (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Advancing the Philosophy of Medicine: Towards New Topics and Sources.Thaddeus Metz & Chadwin Harris - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (3):281-288.
    The first part of a symposium devoted to Alex Broadbent's essay titled ‘Prediction, Understanding and Medicine’, this article notes the under-development of a variety of issues in the philosophy of medicine that transcend bioethics and the long-standing debates about the nature of health/illness and of evidence-based medicine. It also indicates the importance of drawing on non-Western, and particularly African, traditions in addressing these largely metaphysical and epistemological matters.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination.Kaja Damnjanović, Johanna Graeber, Sandra Ilić, Wing Y. Lam, Žan Lep, Sara Morales, Tero Pulkkinen & Loes Vingerhoets - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability.Carrier Martin - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):439-464.
    One of the pervasive distinctions in the history of political thought is the distinction between rule by consent and rule by competence or expertise. A classic locus of this debate is Plato's Politeia in which Plato argues against the rule by consent and advocates philosophers as political leaders. Philosophers are geared toward eternal ideas and for this reason place emphasis on the long-term consequences of political actions. The same idea is expressed today by the notion that devising policies adequately requires (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Embracing the Nature of Complex Interactions: Climate Change and Human Survival. [REVIEW]Cristian Timmermann - 2018 - Metascience 27 (1):155-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Comparison of Philosophical Concerns Between Professionals and the Public Regarding Two Psychiatric Treatments.Laura Yenisa Cabrera, Marisa Brandt, Rachel McKenzie & Robyn Bluhm - forthcoming - Ajob Empirical Bioethics:1-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation