Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Mapping dehumanization studies (Preface and Introduction of Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization).Maria Kronfeldner - 2020 - In Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization. London, New York: Routledge.
    Maria Kronfeldner’s Preface and Introduction to the Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization maps the landscape of dehumanization studies. She starts with a brief portrayal of the history of the field. The systematically minded sections that follow guide the reader through the resulting rugged landscape represented in the Handbook’s contributions. Different realizations, levels, forms, and ontological contrasts of dehumanization are distinguished, followed by remarks on the variety of targets of dehumanization. A discussion on valence and emotional aspects is added. Causes, functions, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Maurizio Meloni’s Political Biology.Steve Fuller - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (1):97-103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Human dignity and the creation of human–nonhuman chimeras.César Palacios-González - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):487-499.
    In this work I present a detailed critique of the dignity-related arguments that have been advanced against the creation of human–nonhuman chimeras that could possess human-like mental capacities. My main claim is that the arguments so far advanced are incapable of grounding a principled objection against the creation of such creatures. I conclude that these arguments have one, or more, of the following problems: they confuse the ethical assessment of the creation of chimeras with the ethical assessment of how such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Human, Human Rights, and DNA Identity Tests.Noa Vaisman - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (1):3-20.
    This special issue examines the diverse realities created by the intersection of emerging technologies, new scientific knowledge, and the human being. It engages with two key questions: how is the human being shaped and constructed in new ways through advances in science and technology? and how might these new ways of imagining the subject shape present and future human rights law and practice? The papers examine a variety of scientific technologies—personalized medicine and organ transplant, mitochondrial DNA replacement, and scaffolds and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Future of Knowing and Values: Information Technologies and Plato's Critique of Rhetoric.Susan B. Levin - 2017 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 50 (2):153-177.
    The most contentious issue in current debates about human enhancement is whether it properly belongs to human aspiration to outstrip our human ceiling in cognition and longevity so radically that the result would not be improved human beings but instead "posthumans." Transhumanists answer strongly in the affirmative and hence vigorously support our directing available and foreseeable technologies to that end. According to Nick Bostrom, transhumanism is "an outgrowth of secular humanism and the Enlightenment." Our "ceasing to be human is [not] (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Who Owns My Autonomous Vehicle? Ethics and Responsibility in Artificial and Human Intelligence.John Harris - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4):599-609.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Human Rights in Bioethics–Theoretical and Applied.John-Stewart Gordon - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):283 - 294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Evaluating ‘Bioethical Approaches’ to Human Rights.Alasdair Cochrane - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):309-322.
    In recent years there has been growing scholarly interest in the relationship between bioethics and human rights. The majority of this work has proposed that the normative and institutional frameworks of human rights can usefully be employed to address those bioethical controversies that have a global reach: in particular, to the genetic modification of human beings, and to the issue of access to healthcare. In response, a number of critics have urged for a degree of caution about applying human rights (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • In search of a post-genomic bioethics.Sarah Chan - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (1):116-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does a Fish Need a Bicycle? Animals and Evolution in the Age of Biotechnology.Sarah Chan & John Harris - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (3):484-492.
    Animals, in the age of biotechnology, are the subjects of a myriad of scientific procedures, interventions, and modifications. They are created, altered, and experimented upon—often with highly beneficial outcomes for humans in terms of knowledge gained and applied, yet not without concern also for the effects upon the experimental subjects themselves: consideration of the use of animals in research remains an intensely debated topic. Concerns for animal welfare in scientific research have, however, been primarily directed at harm to and suffering (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Respect for Persons in Bioethics: Towards a Human Rights-Based Account.Johan Brännmark - 2017 - Human Rights Review 18 (2):171-187.
    Human rights have increasingly been put forward as an important framework for bioethics. In this paper, it is argued that human rights offer a potentially fruitful approach to understanding the notion of Respect for Persons in bioethics. The idea that we are owed a certain kind of respect as persons is relatively common, but also quite often understood in terms of respecting people’s autonomous choices. Such accounts do however risk being too narrow, reducing some human beings to a second-class moral (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations