Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Can sequencing of articulation ease explain the in–out effect? A preregistered test.Sascha Topolinski, Tobias Vogel & Moritz Ingendahl - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    Words whose consonantal articulation places move from the front of the mouth to the back (e.g. BADAKA; inward) receive more positive evaluations than words whose consonantal articulation places move from the back of the mouth to the front (e.g. KADABA; outward). This in–out effect has a variety of affective, cognitive, and even behavioural consequences, but its underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Most recently, a linguistic explanation has been proposed applying the linguistic easy-first account and the so-called labial-coronal effect from developmental speech (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The role of category valence in prototype preference.Moritz Ingendahl, Nadja Propheter & Tobias Vogel - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    People prefer prototypical stimuli over atypical stimuli. The dominant explanation for this prototype preference effect is that prototypical stimuli are processed more fluently. However, a more recent account proposes that prototypes are more strongly associated with their category’s valence, leading to a reversed prototype preference effect for negative categories. One critical but untested assumption of this category-valence account is that no prototype preference should emerge for entirely neutral categories. We tested this prediction by conditioning categories of dot patterns positively, negatively, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark