- Opening up for participation in agro-biodiversity conservation: The expert-lay interplay in a Brazilian social movement. [REVIEW]Ana Delgado - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):559-577.details
|
|
Deficits, Expectations and Paradigms in British and American Drug Safety Assessments: Prising Open the Black Box of Regulatory Science.Courtney Davis & John Abraham - 2007 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (4):399-431.details
|
|
To Mask or Not to Mask.Hsiang-Yun Chen, Li-an Yu & Linus Ta-Lun Huang - 2021 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):503-512.details
|
|
Islet Xeno/transplatation and the risk of contagion: local responses from Canada and Australia to an emerging global technoscience.Myra Cheng - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-23.details
|
|
The Multidimensionality of Environmental Problems: The GMO Controversy and the Limits of Scientific Materialism.Michael S. Carolan - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (1):67 - 82.details
|
|
Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms.Michael S. Carolan - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (4):508-528.details
|
|
Review of Duncan Wilson, The Making of British Bioethics1. [REVIEW]Silvia Camporesi - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):10-12.details
|
|
How knowledge deficit interventions fail to resolve beginning farmer challenges.Adam Calo - 2018 - Agriculture and Human Values 35 (2):367-381.details
|
|
Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius.Douglas M. Bushey & David E. Winickoff - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (3):356-381.details
|
|
Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions.Regula Valérie Burri - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):81-98.details
|
|
Deliberating risks under uncertainty: Experience, trust, and attitudes in a swiss nanotechnology stakeholder discussion group.Regula Valérie Burri - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):143-154.details
|
|
The End of Personification: The Mereological Fallacy in Science Communication on Brain Organoids.Eline M. Bunnik & Sietske A. L. van Till - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):51-54.details
|
|
Participation, Empowerment, and Evidence in the Current Discourse on Personalized Medicine: A Critique of “Democratizing Healthcare”.Tommaso Bruni & Phillip H. Roth - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (5):1033-1056.details
|
|
Three ways to politicize bioethics.Mark B. Brown - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54.details
|
|
A big regulatory tool-box for a small technology.Diana M. Bowman & Graeme A. Hodge - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (2):193-207.details
|
|
Genomics? That is probably GM! The impact a name can have on the interpretation of a technology.Reginald Boersma & Bart Gremmen - 2018 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1):1-15.details
|
|
Wild or Farmed? Seeking Effective Science in a Controversial Environment.Stephen Bocking - 2007 - Spontaneous Generations 1 (1):48.details
|
|
Who is the African Farmer? The Importance of Actor Representations in the Debate About Biotechnology Crops in Africa.Koen Beumer & Jac A. A. Swart - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (1):1-25.details
|
|
Nation-Building and the Governance of Emerging Technologies: the Case of Nanotechnology in India.Koen Beumer - 2019 - NanoEthics 13 (1):5-19.details
|
|
Legal Governance in HTA: Environment, Health and Safety Issues / Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (EHSI/ELSI), the Ongoing Debate.Louise Bernier, Georges Auguste Legault, Charles Étiennel Bédard Daniel, Jean Pierre Béland, Christian A. Bellemare, Pierre Dagenais, Hubert Gagnon, Monelle Parent & Johane Patenaude - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 3 (1):83-92.details
|
|
Regulating Emerging and Future Technologies in the Present.Michael G. Bennett, Jake Gatof, Diana M. Bowman & Karinne Ludlow - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):151-163.details
|
|
Nanotechnology: a new regime for the public in science?Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):85-94.details
|
|
A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology.Silke Beck, Roger Pielke & Eva Lövbrand - 2011 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (4):474-496.details
|
|
Social Representations Theory: A Progressive Research Programme for Social Psychology.Martin W. Bauer & George Gaskell - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (4):335-353.details
|
|
Beyond the Geneticization Thesis: The Political Economy of PGD/pgs in Spain. [REVIEW]Flor Arias & Vincenzo Pavone - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (3):235-261.details
|
|
Hidden Entities and Experimental Practice: Renewing the Dialogue Between History and Philosophy of Science.Theodore Arabatzis - 2011 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 263:125-139.details
|
|
How biological background assumptions influence scientific risk evaluation of stacked genetically modified plants: an analysis of research hypotheses and argumentations.Fredrik Andersen & Elena Rocca - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-20.details
|
|
Science, public policy and engagement: Debates on stem cell research in Brazil.Liliana Acero - 2010 - Genomics, Society and Policy 6 (3):1-17.details
|
|
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?Leonhard Hennen - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41.details
|
|
Engineers of Life? A Critical Examination of the Concept of Life in the Debate on Synthetic Biology.Johannes Steizinger - 2016 - In Toepfer Georg & Engelhard Margret (eds.), : Ambivalences of Creating Life – Societal and Philosophical Dimensions of Synthetic Biology. Springer. pp. 275−292.details
|
|
Dissolving Decision Making? Models and Their Roles in Decision-Making Processes and Policy at Large.Ragna Zeiss & Stans van Egmond - 2014 - Science in Context 27 (4):631-657.details
|
|
Coming to Terms with Biomedical Technologies in Different Technopolitical Cultures: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Groups on Organ Transplantation and Genetic Testing in Austria, France, and the Netherlands.Peter Winkler, Maximilian Fochler & Ulrike Felt - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (4):525-553.details
|
|
Modeling Ethics: Approaches to Data Creep in Higher Education.Madisson Whitman - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (6):1-18.details
|
|
Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders.Erik Westholm & Jenny Andersson - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (2):237-262.details
|
|
Reflections on Reflexive Engagement: Response to Nowotny and Wynne.Andrew Webster - 2007 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (5):608-615.details
|
|
DNA Testing for Family Reunification and the Limits of Biological Truth.Torsten H. Voigt & Catherine Lee - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):430-454.details
|
|
Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.Thomas Völker, Andrea Schikowitz, Judith Igelsböck & Ulrike Felt - 2016 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (4):732-761.details
|
|
Big Biology.Niki Vermeulen - 2016 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 24 (2):195-223.details
|
|
Big Biology: Supersizing Science During the Emergence of the 21st Century.Niki Vermeulen - 2016 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 24 (2):195-223.details
|
|
Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life. [REVIEW]Henk van den Belt - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (3):257-268.details
|
|
Establishing a social licence for Financial Technology: Reflections on the role of the private sector in pursuing ethical data practices.Aad van Moorsel, Karen Elliott, Kovila Coopamootoo, Peter Carmichael, Ehsan Toreini & Mhairi Aitken - 2020 - Big Data and Society 7 (1).details
|
|
The biopolitics of bioethics and disability.Shelley Tremain - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):101-106.details
|
|
GMOs and Global Justice: Applying Global Justice Theory to the Case of Genetically Modified Crops and Food. [REVIEW]Kristian Høyer Toft - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):223-237.details
|
|
Anticipatory Ethics and Governance : Towards a Future Care Orientation Around Nanotechnology.Syed A. M. Tofail, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins & Karena Hester - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):123-136.details
|
|
Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy?Anwar Tlili & Emily Dawson - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):429-461.details
|
|
Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. [REVIEW]Charles Thorpe - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):389-411.details
|
|
Scientific self-regulation—so good, how can it fail?Patrick L. Taylor - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):395-406.details
|
|
Narratives of Race and Indigeneity in the Genographic Project.Kim TallBear - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):412-424.details
|
|
Narratives of Race and Indigeneity in the Genographic Project.Kim TallBear - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):412-424.details
|
|
Modelling Beyond Application: Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in Modern Science.Ekaterina Svetlova - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):79-98.details
|
|