Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The minimal complementation property above 0′.Andrew E. M. Lewis - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):470-492.
    Let us say that any (Turing) degree d > 0 satisfies the minimal complementation property (MCP) if for every degree 0 < a < d there exists a minimal degree b < d such that a ∨ b = d (and therefore a ∧ b = 0). We show that every degree d ≥ 0′ satisfies MCP. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reducibility orderings: Theories, definability and automorphisms.Anil Nerode & Richard A. Shore - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 18 (1):61-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Generics for computable Mathias forcing.Peter A. Cholak, Damir D. Dzhafarov, Jeffry L. Hirst & Theodore A. Slaman - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (9):1418-1428.
    We study the complexity of generic reals for computable Mathias forcing in the context of computability theory. The n -generics and weak n -generics form a strict hierarchy under Turing reducibility, as in the case of Cohen forcing. We analyze the complexity of the Mathias forcing relation, and show that if G is any n -generic with n≥2n≥2 then it satisfies the jump property G≡TG′⊕∅G≡TG′⊕∅. We prove that every such G has generalized high Turing degree, and so cannot have even (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • 1-Generic degrees and minimal degrees in higher recursion theory, II.C. T. Chong - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 31:165-175.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • 2-Minimality, jump classes and a note on natural definability.Mingzhong Cai - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):724-741.
    We show that there is a generalized high degree which is a minimal cover of a minimal degree. This is the highest jump class one can reach by finite iterations of minimality. This result also answers an old question by Lerman.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Local initial segments of the Turing degrees.Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (1):26-36.
    Recent results on initial segments of the Turing degrees are presented, and some conjectures about initial segments that have implications for the existence of nontrivial automorphisms of the Turing degrees are indicated.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Degrees which do not bound minimal degrees.Manuel Lerman - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (3):249-276.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Parameter definability in the recursively enumerable degrees.André Nies - 2003 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 3 (01):37-65.
    The biinterpretability conjecture for the r.e. degrees asks whether, for each sufficiently large k, the [Formula: see text] relations on the r.e. degrees are uniformly definable from parameters. We solve a weaker version: for each k ≥ 7, the [Formula: see text] relations bounded from below by a nonzero degree are uniformly definable. As applications, we show that Low 1 is parameter definable, and we provide methods that lead to a new example of a ∅-definable ideal. Moreover, we prove that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A Hierarchy of Computably Enumerable Degrees.Rod Downey & Noam Greenberg - 2018 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):53-89.
    We introduce a new hierarchy of computably enumerable degrees. This hierarchy is based on computable ordinal notations measuring complexity of approximation of${\rm{\Delta }}_2^0$functions. The hierarchy unifies and classifies the combinatorics of a number of diverse constructions in computability theory. It does so along the lines of the high degrees (Martin) and the array noncomputable degrees (Downey, Jockusch, and Stob). The hierarchy also gives a number of natural definability results in the c.e. degrees, including a definable antichain.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A non-inversion theorem for the jump operator.Richard A. Shore - 1988 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 40 (3):277-303.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • A 2-minimal non-gl2 degree.Mingzhong Cai - 2010 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):1-30.
    We show that there is a non-GL2 degree which is a minimal cover of a minimal degree. This answers a question by Lerman.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • There is no ordering on the classes in the generalized high/low hierarchies.Antonio Montalbán - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (2):215-231.
    We prove that the existential theory of the Turing degrees, in the language with Turing reduction, 0, and unary relations for the classes in the generalized high/low hierarchy, is decidable. We also show that every finite poset labeled with elements of (where is the partition of induced by the generalized high/low hierarchy) can be embedded in preserving the labels. Note that no condition is imposed on the labels.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Hyperimmune Minimal Degree and an ANR 2-Minimal Degree.Mingzhong Cai - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):443-455.
    We develop a new method for constructing hyperimmune minimal degrees and construct an ANR degree which is a minimal cover of a minimal degree.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Reals n-Generic Relative to Some Perfect Tree.Bernard A. Anderson - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):401 - 411.
    We say that a real X is n-generic relative to a perfect tree T if X is a path through T and for all $\Sigma _{n}^{0}(T)$ sets S, there exists a number k such that either X|k ∈ S or for all σ ∈ T extending X|k we have σ ∉ S. A real X is n-generic relative to some perfect tree if there exists such a T. We first show that for every number n all but countably many reals (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Mathias generic sets.Peter A. Cholak, Damir D. Dzhafarov & Jeffry L. Hirst - 2012 - In S. Barry Cooper (ed.), How the World Computes. pp. 129--138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Lattice embeddings and array noncomputable degrees.Stephen M. Walk - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):219.
    We focus on a particular class of computably enumerable degrees, the array noncomputable degrees defined by Downey, Jockusch, and Stob, to answer questions related to lattice embeddings and definability in the partial ordering of c. e. degrees under Turing reducibility. We demonstrate that the latticeM5 cannot be embedded into the c. e. degrees below every array noncomputable degree, or even below every nonlow array noncomputable degree. As Downey and Shore have proved that M5 can be embedded below every nonlow2 degree, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • 1-Generic splittings of computably enumerable degrees.Guohua Wu - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 138 (1):211-219.
    Say a set Gω is 1-generic if for any eω, there is a string σG such that {e}σ↓ or τσ↑). It is known that can be split into two 1-generic degrees. In this paper, we generalize this and prove that any nonzero computably enumerable degree can be split into two 1-generic degrees. As a corollary, no two computably enumerable degrees bound the same class of 1-generic degrees.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Degree theoretic definitions of the low2 recursively enumerable sets.Rod Downey & Richard A. Shore - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):727 - 756.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees.M. Lerman - 1985 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 29 (3):225-254.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations