Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Introduction: Systematicity, the Nature of Science?Karim Bschir, Simon Lohse & Hasok Chang - 2017 - Synthese:1-13.
    Introduction to Synthese SI: Systematicity: The Nature of Science?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Whose Social Values? Evaluating Canada’s ‘Death of Evidence’ Controversy.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):404-424.
    With twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy of science’s unfolding acceptance of the nature of scientific inquiry being value-laden, the persistent worry has been that there are no means for legitimate negotiation of the social or non-epistemic values that enter into science. The rejection of the value-free ideal in science has thereby been coupled with the spectres of indiscriminate relativism and bias in scientific inquiry. I challenge this view in the context of recently expressed concerns regarding Canada's death of evidence controversy. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Emotional Life of Reason: Exploring Conceptions of Objectivity.C. Pinto Robert & E. Pinto Laura - unknown
    This paper extends Pinto’s “Emotions and Reasons” by exploring relationships between emotions-as-reasons and in conceptualizing objectivity as naturalized to address the evaluative dimension. The paper addresses the emotional character of reason with respect to subjective and normative validity by shifting analysis to socially situated practices.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From Real Essences to the Feminine Imaginary : Critiques of Essentialism in Feminist Theory in North America in the 1980's.Kathryn Snider - unknown
    The polemical debate, within feminist theory in North America, in the 1980s, around essentialism is the central focus of this thesis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Gender, Objectivity, And Realism.Alan Soble - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):509-530.
    A detailed examination of the philosophy of science of Evelyn Fox Keller, with special emphasis on her account of "objectivity" and her understanding of the methodology of Barbara McClintock.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Pluralistic Approach to Interactional Expertise.Kathryn S. Plaisance & Eric B. Kennedy - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:60-68.
    The concept of interactional expertise – characterized by sociologists Harry Collins and Robert Evans as the ability to speak the language of a discipline without the corresponding ability to practice – can serve as a powerful way of breaking down expert/non-expert dichotomies and providing a role for new voices in specialist communities. However, in spite of the vast uptake of this concept and its potential to fruitfully address many important issues related to scientific expertise, there has been surprisingly little critical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Whole Set of Volume 3 No 1 (2012).Bo Mou - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 3 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How is This Paper Philosophy?Kristie Dotson - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):3-29.
    his paper answers a call made by Anita Allen to genuinely assess whether the field of philosophy has the capacity to sustain the work of diverse peoples. By identifying a pervasive culture of justification within professional philosophy, I gesture to the ways professional philosophy is not an attractive working environment for many diverse practitioners. As a result of the downsides of the culture of justification that pervades professional philosophy, I advocate that the discipline of professional philosophy be cast according to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Introduction to The Challenge of Epistemic Responsibility: Essays in Honour of Lorraine Code.Anna Mudde - 2016 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 2 (2):1-5.
    This paper introduces The Challenge of Epistemic Responsibility: Essays in Honour of Lorraine Code. In this symposium of papers, invited by Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, the authors return to Code’s first book, Epistemic Responsibility, to re-read it, respond to it, and rethink Code’s articulation of epistemic responsibility anew, considering it in light of her other work and drawing it into contact with their own. This symposium is the outcome of a conference panel that Anna Mudde co-organized with Susan Dieleman, held October (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Introduction: Systematicity, the Nature of Science?Karim Bschir, Simon Lohse & Hasok Chang - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):761-773.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Responsibility and Rhetoric.Lorraine Code - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (1):1 - 20.
    In this paper I offer a retrospective rereading of my work on epistemic responsibility in order to see why this inquiry has found only an uneasy location within the discourse of Anglo-American epistemology. I trace the history of the work's production, circulation and reception, and examine the feminist implications of the discussions it has occasioned.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Feminist Epistemology and Women Scientists.Alan Soble - 1983 - Metaphilosophy 14 (3-4):291-307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • From Feminist Thinking to Ecological Thinking: Determining the Bounds of Community.Heidi E. Grasswick - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (1):150-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations