Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. General Relativity as a Collection of Collections of Models.J. B. Manchak - 2021 - In Judit Madarász & Gergely Székely (eds.), Hajnal Andréka and István Németi on Unity of Science: From Computing to Relativity Theory Through Algebraic Logic. Springer. pp. 409-425.
    One usually identifies a particular collection of geometric objects with the models of general relativity. But within this standard collection lurk ‘physically unreasonable’ models of spacetime. If such models are ruled out, attention can be restricted to some sub-collection of ‘physically reasonable’ models which can be considered a variant theory of general relativity. Since we have yet to identify a privileged sub-collection of ‘physically reasonable’ models, it is helpful to think of ‘general relativity’ in a pluralistic way; we can study (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On Feyerabend, general relativity, and 'unreasonable' universes.J. B. Manchak - 2021 - In Karim Bschir & Jamie Shaw (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    I investigate the principle *anything goes* within the context of general relativity. After a few preliminaries, I show a sense in which the universe is unknowable from within this context; I suggest that we 'keep our options open' with respect to competing models of it. Given the state of affairs, proceeding counter-inductively seems to be especially appropriate; I use this method to blur some of the usual lines between 'reasonable' and 'unreasonable' models of the universe. Along the way, one is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Singularities, Black Holes, and Cosmic Censorship: A Tribute to Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]Klaas Landsman - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (2):1-38.
    In the light of his recent (and fully deserved) Nobel Prize, this pedagogical paper draws attention to a fundamental tension that drove Penrose’s work on general relativity. His 1965 singularity theorem (for which he got the prize) does not in fact imply the existence of black holes (even if its assumptions are met). Similarly, his versatile definition of a singular space–time does not match the generally accepted definition of a black hole (derived from his concept of null infinity). To overcome (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Some Other “No Hole” Spacetimes Properties Are Unstable Too.Juliusz Doboszewski - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (5):379-384.
    Two interesting “no hole” spacetime properties, not being future nakedly singular) are unstable in the fine topology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark