Results for 'Klaas Landsman'

5 found
Order:
See also
Klaas Landsman
Radboud University Nijmegen
  1.  51
    Indeterminism and Undecidability.Klaas Landsman - forthcoming - In Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability. Cham: Springer Nature.
    The aim of this paper is to argue that the (alleged) indeterminism of quantum mechanics, claimed by adherents of the Copenhagen interpretation since Born (1926), can be proved from Chaitin's follow-up to Goedel's (first) incompleteness theorem. In comparison, Bell's (1964) theorem as well as the so-called free will theorem-originally due to Heywood and Redhead (1983)-left two loopholes for deterministic hidden variable theories, namely giving up either locality (more precisely: local contextuality, as in Bohmian mechanics) or free choice (i.e. uncorrelated measurement (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Does Physics Make Us Free?: J.T. Ismael: How Physics Makes Us Free. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 288 Pp, $29.95 HB. [REVIEW]Natalja Deng & Klaas Landsman - 2017 - Metascience 26 (1):127-130.
    This is a joint review of Jenann Ismael's 'How physics makes us free' (OUP).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  30
    Klaas Kraay . God and the Multiverse: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Perspectives. [REVIEW]Bruce Langtry - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (3):221-225.
    My review summarizes the book's constituent papers, with occasional brief comments. All of the contributions are competent and interesting.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Satisficing and Motivated Submaximization (in the Philosophy of Religion).Chris Tucker - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):127-143.
    In replying to certain objections to the existence of God, Robert Adams, Bruce Langtry, and Peter van Inwagen assume that God can appropriately choose a suboptimal world, a world less good than some other world God could have chosen. A number of philosophers, such as Michael Slote and Klaas Kraay, claim that these theistic replies are therefore committed to the claim that satisficing can be appropriate. Kraay argues that this commitment is a significant liability. I argue, however, that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  5. In Defence of No Best World.Daniel Rubio - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy (4):811-825.
    Recent work in the philosophy of religion has resurrected Leibniz’s idea that there is a best possible world, perhaps ours. In particular, Klaas Kraay’s [2010] construction of a theistic multiverse and Nevin Climenhaga’s [2018] argument from infinite value theory are novel defenses of a best possible world. I do not think that there is a best world, and show how both Kraay and Climenhaga may be resisted. First, I argue that Kraay’s construction of a theistic multiverse can be resisted (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations