Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Expansion of the Universe and Spacetime Ontology.Giovanni Macchia - 2018 - Humana Mente 4 (13).
    The debate on the ontological status of spacetime in General Relativity has historically seen two principal philosophical contenders: substantivalism, roughly the view that holds that spacetime exists apart from the material contents of the universe, and relationism, the doctrine that spacetime does not exist, i.e., it is a mere abstract web of spatiotemporal relations among bodies. This dispute, however, has rarely been fought on a cosmological battlefield. In this paper an attempt in this direction is made. The question at issue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)The Idea of a Cosmic Time.Wegener Mogens - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1777-1799.
    The paper shows the standard definition of time at a distance to be beset with ambiguities that may be solved by making a fresh start taking its point of departure in the idea of a cosmic time as proposed by the British tradition of relativistic cosmology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)The Idea of a Cosmic Time.Mogens Wegener - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1777-1799.
    The paper shows the standard definition of time at a distance to be beset with ambiguities that may be solved by making a fresh start taking its point of departure in the idea of a cosmic time as proposed by the British tradition of relativistic cosmology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Philosophical Contexts of the Steady-State Universe.Helge Kragh - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):129-145.
    Modern standard big bang cosmology was preceded by a 15-year controversy with the rival steady-state theory of the universe. At a time when cosmologically relevant observations were scarce and cosmology was widely regarded as an immature science, or not a science at all, much of the debate took place by means of arguments that were essentially philosophical. Remarkably, professional philosophers, including some of the key figures of Anglo-American philosophy of science, took an active part in the debate; no less remarkably, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark