Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the relationship between plane and solid geometry.Andrew Arana & Paolo Mancosu - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):294-353.
    Traditional geometry concerns itself with planimetric and stereometric considerations, which are at the root of the division between plane and solid geometry. To raise the issue of the relation between these two areas brings with it a host of different problems that pertain to mathematical practice, epistemology, semantics, ontology, methodology, and logic. In addition, issues of psychology and pedagogy are also important here. To our knowledge there is no single contribution that studies in detail even one of the aforementioned areas.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Formalization, primitive concepts, and purity: Formalization, primitive concepts, and purity.John T. Baldwin - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):87-128.
    We emphasize the role of the choice of vocabulary in formalization of a mathematical area and remark that this is a particular preoccupation of logicians. We use this framework to discuss Kennedy’s notion of ‘formalism freeness’ in the context of various schools in model theory. Then we clarify some of the mathematical issues in recent discussions of purity in the proof of the Desargues proposition. We note that the conclusion of ‘spatial content’ from the Desargues proposition involves arguments which are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • David Hilbert. David Hilbert's lectures on the foundations of geometry, 1891–1902. Michael Hallett and Ulrich Majer, eds. David Hilbert's Foundational Lectures; 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-540-64373-7. Pp. xxviii + 661. [REVIEW]V. Pambuccian - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):255-277.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Case for the Irreducibility of Geometry to Algebra†.Victor Pambuccian & Celia Schacht - 2022 - Philosophia Mathematica 30 (1):1-31.
    This paper provides a definitive answer, based on considerations derived from first-order logic, to the question regarding the status of elementary geometry, whether elementary geometry can be reduced to algebra. The answer we arrive at is negative, and is based on a series of structural questions that can be asked only inside the geometric formal theory, as well as the consideration of reverse geometry, which is the art of finding minimal axiom systems strong enough to prove certain geometrical theorems, given (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark