Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.Zoltan Dienes - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5:85883.
    No scientific conclusion follows automatically from a statistically non-significant result, yet people routinely use non-significant results to guide conclusions about the status of theories (or the effectiveness of practices). To know whether a non-significant result counts against a theory, or if it just indicates data insensitivity, researchers must use one of: power, intervals (such as confidence or credibility intervals), or else an indicator of the relative evidence for one theory over another, such as a Bayes factor. I argue Bayes factors (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   116 citations  
  • Implicit learning.Axel Cleeremans - 1998 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (10):406-416.
    Implicit learning is the process through which we become sensitive to certain regularities in the environment (1) in the absence of intention to learn about those regularities (2) in the absence of awareness that one is learning, and (3) in such a way that the resulting knowledge is difficult to express.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Computational Correlates of Consciousness.Axel Cleeremans - 1963 - In Steven Laureys (ed.), The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology: Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier.
    Over the past few years numerous proposals have appeared that attempt to characterize consciousness in terms of what could be called its computational correlates: Principles of information processing with which to characterize the differences between conscious and unconscious processing. Proposed computational correlates include architectural specialization (such as the involvement of specific regions of the brain in conscious processing), properties of representations (such as their stability in time or their strength), and properties of specific processes (such as resonance, synchrony, interactivity, or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Can hypnotic susceptibility be explained by bifactor models? Structural equation modeling of the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility – Form A.Anoushiravan Zahedi & Werner Sommer - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 99 (C):103289.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Direct verbal suggestibility: Measurement and significance.David A. Oakley, Eamonn Walsh, Mitul A. Mehta, Peter W. Halligan & Quinton Deeley - 2021 - Consciousness and Cognition 89:103036.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The interoception and imagination loop in hypnotic phenomena.Alain Parra & Arnaud Rey - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 73:102765.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark