Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review.Jan Piasecki, Ewa Walkiewicz-Żarek, Justyna Figas-Skrzypulec, Anna Kordecka & Vilius Dranseika - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (4):633-658.
    Digitization of a health record changes its accessibility. An electronic health record (EHR) can be accessed by multiple authorized users. Health information from EHRs contributes to learning healthcare systems’ development. The objective of this systematic review is to answer a question: What are ethical issues concerning research using EHRs in the literature? We searched Medline Ovid, Embase and Scopus for publications concerning ethical issues of research use of EHRs. We employed the constant comparative method to retrieve common ethical themes. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Present and future.Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (6):361-361.
    As the COVID-19 pandemic rages on, this June 2021 issue of the JME contains several articles addressing pandemic-related ethical issues, including, discrimination against persons with disabilities,1 collective moral resilience,2 and stress in medical students due to COVID-19.3 It also contains a critical appraisal of the most recent WHO guidance document on the management of ethical issues during an infectious disease outbreak.4 This June issue of JME also addresses several important clinical ethics issues: covert administration of medication in food,5 educational pelvic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?Andrew Garland, Stephanie Morain & Jeremy Sugarman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (8):22-32.
    Clinicians have good moral and professional reasons to contribute to pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs). We argue that clinicians have a defeasible duty to participate in this research that takes place in usual care settings and does not involve substantive deviation from their ordinary care practices. However, a variety of countervailing reasons may excuse clinicians from this duty in particular cases. Yet because there is a moral default in favor of participating, clinicians who wish to opt out of this research must (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations