Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Resource Allocation, Treatment, Disclosure, and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Some Comments on de Melo-Martin and Harris.César Palacios-gonzález - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (2):278-287.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • “I Want Us to Be a Normal Family”: Toward an Understanding of the Functions of Anonymity Among U.S. Oocyte Donors and Recipients.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Lisa R. Rubin & Ina N. Cholst - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (4):235-251.
    Abstract BACKGROUND: Anonymity remains the more common practice in gamete donations, but legislation prohibiting anonymity with a goal of protecting donor-conceived children's right to know their genetic origins is becoming more common. However, given the dearth of research investigating the function of anonymity for donors and recipients, it is unclear whether these policies will accomplish their goals. The aim of this study was to explore experiences with anonymity among oocyte donors and recipients who participated in an anonymous donor oocyte program (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mitochondrial Donation and ‘the Right to Know’.Reuven Brandt - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (10):678-684.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the Right to Know and The Use of Double Standards: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Right to Know Your Genetic Parents: From Open Identity Gamete Donation to Routine Paternity Testing”.An Ravelingien & Guido Pennings - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W6 - W8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Right to Know and The Use of Double Standards: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Right to Know Your Genetic Parents: From Open Identity Gamete Donation to Routine Paternity Testing”.An Ravelingien & Guido Pennings - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):33-41.
    Over the years a number of countries have abolished anonymous gamete donation and shifted toward open-identity policies. Donor-conceived children are said to have a fundamental ?right to know? the identity of their donor. In this article, we trace the arguments that underlie this claim and question its implications. We argue that, given the status attributed to the right to know one's gamete donor, it would be discriminatory not to extend this right to naturally conceived children with misattributed paternity. One way (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Mitochondrial/Nuclear Transfer: A Literature Review of the Ethical, Legal and Social Issues.Raphaëlle Dupras-Leduc, Stanislav Birko & Vardit Ravitsky - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 1 (2):1-17.
    Mitochondrial/nuclear transfer to avoid the transmission of serious mitochondrial disease raises complex and challenging ethical, legal and social issues. In February 2015, the United Kingdom became the first country in the world to legalize M/NT, making the heated debate surrounding this technology even more relevant. This critical interpretive review identified 95 relevant papers discussing the ELSI of M/NT, including original research articles, government-commissioned reports, editorials, letters to editors and research news. The review presents and synthesizes the arguments present in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Resource Allocation, Treatment, Disclosure, and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques.César Palacios-gonzález - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (2):278-287.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Donor Conception and Lack of Access to Genetic Heritage.Vardit Ravitsky - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12):45-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Autonomous Choice and the Right to Know One's Genetic Origins.Vardit Ravitsky - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (2):36-37.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?Inez Raes, An Ravelingien & Guido Pennings - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (3):369-379.
    It is widely agreed among health professionals that couples using donor insemination should be offered counselling on the topic of donor conception disclosure. However, it is clear from the literature that there has long been a lack of agreement about which counselling approach should be used in this case: a directive or a non-directive approach. In this paper we investigate which approach is ethically justifiable by balancing the two underlying principles of autonomy and beneficence. To overrule one principle in favour (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Ethics of Anonymous Gamete Donation:Is There a Right to Know One's Genetic Origins?Inmaculada De Melo-Martín - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (2):28-35.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations