Well-being, gamete donation, & genetic knowledge: the significant interest view

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Every year, thousands of children are conceived with gametes from anonymous donors. By some estimates, there are more than 1 million donor-conceived children (donor-conceived people) living in the United States alone. In all likelihood, these donor-conceived people will never know the identity of their donor. Is this a problem? More specifically, do prospective parents who plan to conceive a child via gamete donation have a weighty reason to use a known or “identity-release” donor? I argue that the answer is "yes". To put my view (too) simply: the fact that a donor-conceived person – who knows she is donor-conceived – is likely to be very interested in acquiring genetic knowledge gives prospective parents a weighty reason to use an identity-release donor. This is because parents should promote their children’s well-being through the satisfaction of their children’s worthwhile significant interests.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GROWGD
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-04-19
Latest version: 4 (2020-02-05)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-19

Total views
103 ( #43,136 of 2,445,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,562 of 2,445,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.