Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Feature Binding and Object Perception. Does Object Awareness Require Feature Conjunction?Dario Taraborelli - unknown
    Recent work in different fields of cognitive sciences seems to support the idea that in order to explain awareness of visually presented objects some kind of binding mechanism is needed for the correct conjunction of different sensory features into a whole percept. Selective attention is commonly invoked as the key for solving this conjunction problem. Accordingly, the cognitive neurosciences have begun to investigate what kind of neural processing could underlie such a process. I analyse the evidence provided for justifying the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings.James T. Enns & Ronald A. Rensink - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (3):335-351.
    It has generally been assumed that rapid visual search is based on simple features and that spatial relations between features are irrelevant for this task. Seven experiments involving search for line drawings contradict this assumption; a major determinant of search is the presence of line junctions. Arrow- and Y-junctions were detected rapidly in isolation and when they were embedded in drawings of rectangular polyhedra. Search for T-junctions was considerably slower. Drawings containing T-junctions often gave rise to very slow search even (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • The analysis of resource-limited vision systems.Ronald A. Rensink & Greg Provan - 1991 - Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 1:311-316.
    This paper explores the ways in which resource limitations influence the nature of perceptual and cognitive processes. A framework is developed that allows early visual processing to be analyzed in terms of these limitations. In this approach, there is no one ``best'' system for any visual process. Rather, a spectrum of systems exists, differing in the particular trade-offs made between performance and resource requirements.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Visual Attention.Jeremy Wolfe - 2000 - In K.K. De Valois (ed.), Seeing. Academic Press. pp. 335-386.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping.Ronald A. Rensink & James T. Enns - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (1):101-130.
    Experiments are presented showing that visual search for Mueller-Lyer (ML) stimuli is based on complete configurations, rather than component segments. Segments easily detected in isolation were difficult to detect when embedded in a configuration, indicating preemption by low-level groups. This preemption—which caused stimulus components to become inaccessible to rapid search—was an all-or-nothing effect, and so could serve as a powerful test of grouping. It is shown that these effects are unlikely to be due to blurring by simple spatial filters at (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • The role of priming in conjunctive visual search.Árni Kristjánsson, DeLiang Wang & Ken Nakayama - 2002 - Cognition 85 (1):37-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Top-down effect on pupillary response: Evidence from shape from shading.Ayelet Sapir, Ronen Hershman & Avishai Henik - 2021 - Cognition 212 (C):104664.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An implicit measure of undetected change.Ian Thornton & Diego Fernandez-Duque - 2000 - Spatial Vision 14 (1):21-44.
    b>—Several paradigms (e.g. change blindness, inattentional blindness, transsaccadic integra- tion) indicate that observers are often very poor at reporting changes to their visual environment. Such evidence has been used to suggest that the spatio-temporal coherence needed to represent change can only occur in the presence of focused attention. However, those studies almost always rely on explicit reports. It remains a possibility that the visual system can implicitly detect change, but that in the absence of focused attention, the change does not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • The level of attention: Mediating between the stimulus and perception.Jeremy Wolfe - 2003 - In Laurence Harris & Michael Jenkin (eds.), Levels of Perception: A Festschrift for Ian Howard. Springer Verlag.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark