Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Max Weber and Ernst Toller: realists or idealists?Christopher Adair-Toteff - 2007 - History of the Human Sciences 20 (1):1-17.
    Max Weber and Ernst Toller are regarded as political opposites with the former viewed as the responsible realist and the latter as an ethical idealist. I argue that this contrast between the two is not as great as is customarily thought.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On worldviews.Sander Griffioen - 2012 - Philosophia Reformata 77 (1):19-56.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Towards a philosophy of God. A study in William desmond’s thought.Sander Griffioen - 2010 - Philosophia Reformata 75 (2):117-140.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The limits of reason and some limitations of Weber's morality.Regis A. Factor & Stephen Turner - 1979 - Human Studies 2 (1):301 - 334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Addressing the Specificity of Social Concepts: Rickert, Weber, and the Dual contrast Theory.Arnaud Dewalque - unknown
    In this chapter, it is argued that Weber's particular combination of Von Kries' naturalistic paradigm and Rickert's antinaturalistic paradigm might become less puzzling if we return to the interpretation that emerged in the middle of the nineteen-twenties within the South-Western School of neo-Kantianism. The basic intuition which underlies this interpretation is that the social sciences are best understood as generalizing cultural sciences. On this understanding, they differ both from the natural sciences and the historical sciences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark