Switch to: References

Citations of:

Paradox and projection

Philosophy of Science 39 (2):245-248 (1972)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hempel's Raven paradox: A lacuna in the standard bayesian solution.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (3):545-560.
    According to Hempel's paradox, evidence (E) that an object is a nonblack nonraven confirms the hypothesis (H) that every raven is black. According to the standard Bayesian solution, E does confirm H but only to a minute degree. This solution relies on the almost never explicitly defended assumption that the probability of H should not be affected by evidence that an object is nonblack. I argue that this assumption is implausible, and I propose a way out for Bayesians. Introduction Hempel's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Eight journals over eight decades: a computational topic-modeling approach to contemporary philosophy of science.Christophe Malaterre, Francis Lareau, Davide Pulizzotto & Jonathan St-Onge - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):2883-2923.
    As a discipline of its own, the philosophy of science can be traced back to the founding of its academic journals, some of which go back to the first half of the twentieth century. While the discipline has been the object of many historical studies, notably focusing on specific schools or major figures of the field, little work has focused on the journals themselves. Here, we investigate contemporary philosophy of science by means of computational text-mining approaches: we apply topic-modeling algorithms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Hempel's ravens, the natural classification of hypotheses and the growth of knowledge.Menachem Fisch - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (1):45 - 62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations