- Humean Nature: How Desire Explains Action, Thought, and Feeling, by Neil Sinhababu.Karl Schafer - 2018 - Mind 127 (507):919-928.details
|
|
A brief history of rationality: Reason, reasonableness, rationality, and reasons.Karl Schafer - 2018 - Manuscrito 41 (4):501-529.details
|
|
Agente crítico, democracia deliberativa y el acto de dar razones.Cristián Santibáñez - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):37-65.details
|
|
In defense of picturing; Sellars’s philosophy of mind and cognitive neuroscience.Carl B. Sachs - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (4):669-689.details
|
|
Anxiety as a Positive Epistemic Emotion in Politics.Antonia Rosati, Florencia Guglielmetti & Leandro De Brasi - 2021 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 33 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Knowledge in real-world contexts: not glamorous, but indispensable.Patricia Rich - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-32.details
|
|
Assessing Classification Reliability of Conditionals in Discourse.Alex Reuneker - 2023 - Argumentation 37 (3):397-418.details
|
|
Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation.Carlo Proietti & Antonio Yuste-Ginel - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):8641-8700.details
|
|
What is Symbolic Cognition?Ronald J. Planer - 2019 - Topoi 40 (1):233-244.details
|
|
Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them.Manuela Fernández Pinto - 2023 - Perspectives on Science 31 (5):535-554.details
|
|
Rationality: What it is, why it seems scarce, why it matters. [REVIEW]Enrico Petracca - 2022 - Journal of Economic Methodology 29 (4):335-339.details
|
|
Argumentation, cognition, and the epistemic benefits of cognitive diversity.Renne Pesonen - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-17.details
|
|
Whither extensions?David Pereplyotchik - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (2):237-250.details
|
|
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction.Iñaki Xavier Larrauri Pertierra - 2021 - Argumentation 36 (1):17-34.details
|
|
Review of Selene Arfini, Ignorant Cognition, Springer, 2019. [REVIEW]Matías Osta-Vélez - 2021 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 40 (2):231-236.details
|
|
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception.Paula Olmos - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):151-183.details
|
|
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction.Paula Olmos - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (2):131-164.details
|
|
Abduction and comparative weighing of explanatory hypotheses: an argumentative approach.Paula Olmos - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.details
|
|
Abduction and comparative weighing of explanatory hypotheses: an argumentative approach.Paula Olmos - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.details
|
|
Origen y función de la argumentación: Pasos hacia una explicación evolutiva y cognitiva, de Cristián Santibáñez (2018). Palestra, 370 p. [REVIEW]Giohanny Olave - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):289-292.details
|
|
Mental models, computational explanation and Bayesian cognitive science: Commentary on Knauff and Gazzo Castañeda (2023).Mike Oaksford - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 29 (3):371-382.details
|
|
Chasing the Rainbow: The Non-conscious Nature of Being.David A. Oakley & Peter W. Halligan - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:281365.details
|
|
Who’s Afraid of Adversariality? Conflict and Cooperation in Argumentation.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2020 - Topoi 40 (5):873-886.details
|
|
The Role of Trust in Argumentation.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (2):205-236.details
|
|
Rooting Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation in Jung, and Its Extension to Law.Marko Novak - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (3):383-421.details
|
|
Epistemic justice and experiential self.V. Hari Narayanan - 2023 - Mind and Society 22 (1):67-85.details
|
|
Enhancement, Authenticity, and Social Acceptance in the Age of Individualism.Nicolae Morar & Daniel R. Kelly - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):51-53.details
|
|
A Moral Defense of Trophy Hunting and Why It Fails.S. P. Morris - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (3):386-399.details
|
|
Why truth matters.Jacques Moeschler - 2021 - Pragmatics and Cognition 28 (2):416-440.details
|
|
Why truth matters : When relevance meets truthfulness.Jacques Moeschler - 2021 - Pragmatics Cognition 28 (2):416-440.details
|
|
Sincerity, authenticity and profilicity: Notes on the problem, a vocabulary and a history of identity.Hans-Georg Moeller & Paul J. D’Ambrosio - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (5):575-596.details
|
|
Developmental and cultural factors in economic beliefs.Helena Miton & Dan Sperber - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.details
|
|
Sentimentalist Contractualism—the First Steps.Nenad Miscevic - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (4):427-446.details
|
|
Political Epistemology: Debating the Burning Issue.Nenad Miščević - 2020 - Acta Analytica 35 (3):333-350.details
|
|
How does social cognition shape enculturation?John Michael & Leon de Bruin - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.details
|
|
Confirmation bias without rhyme or reason.Matthias Michel & Megan A. K. Peters - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):2757-2772.details
|
|
Social ontology in metaethics.Gloria Mähringer - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.details
|
|
Intuitions about the epistemic virtues of majority voting.Hugo Mercier, Martin Dockendorff, Yoshimasa Majima, Anne-Sophie Hacquin & Melissa Schwartzberg - forthcoming - Thinking and Reasoning:1-19.details
|
|
How Good Are We At Evaluating Communicated Information?Hugo Mercier - 2021 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89:257-272.details
|
|
Are humans the only rational animals?Giacomo Melis & Susana Monsó - 2023 - The Philosophical Quarterly.details
|
|
Bias in Science: Natural and Social.Joshua May - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):3345–3366.details
|
|
Evaluación del razonamiento y la argumentación: procesos competentes, productos correctos y función propia.Fabián Bernache Maldonado - 2018 - Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 28 (2):308-324.details
|
|
What is it to remember?Johannes B. Mahr & Gergely Csibra - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.details
|
|
Stop me if you've heard this one before: The Chomskyan hammer and the Skinnerian nail.Alex Madva - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:52-54.details
|
|
Belief: What is it Good for?John MacFarlane - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-18.details
|
|
AI, Explainability and Public Reason: The Argument from the Limitations of the Human Mind.Jocelyn Maclure - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (3):421-438.details
|
|
The Epistemic Benefits of Worldview Disagreement.Kirk Lougheed - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (1):85-98.details
|
|
The Epistemic Benefits of Diversifying the Philosophy of Religion.Kirk Lougheed - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1):77-94.details
|
|
The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements.Kirk Lougheed - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (2):263-292.details
|
|
Showing our seams: A reply to Eric Funkhouser.Neil Levy - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (7):991-1006.details
|
|