Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi.Jan Westerhoff - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (4):367-395.
    The catuṣkoṭi or tetralemma is an argumentative figure familiar to any reader of Buddhist philosophical literature. Roughly speaking it consists of the enumeration of four alternatives: that some propositions holds, that it fails to hold, that it both holds and fails to hold, that it neither holds nor fails to hold. The tetralemma also constitutes one of the more puzzling features of Buddhist philosophy as the use to which it is put in arguments is not immediately obvious and certainly not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Thinking Negation in Early Hinduism and Classical Indian Philosophy.Purushottama Bilimoria - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (1):13-33.
    A number of different kinds of negation and negation of negation are developed in Indian thought, from ancient religious texts to classical philosophy. The paper explores the Mīmāṃsā, Nyāya, Jaina and Buddhist theorizing on the various forms and permutations of negation, denial, nullity, nothing and nothingness, or emptiness. The main thesis argued for is that in the broad Indic tradition, negation cannot be viewed as a mere classical operator turning the true into the false, nor reduced to the mainstream Boolean (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Logic and dialectics in the madhyamakakārikās.Guy Bugault - 1983 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 11 (1):7-76.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • On the formal arguments of the akutobhayā.Joseph Walser - 1998 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 26 (3):189-232.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (2 other versions)On Pā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$$ inian studies: A reply to Cardona. [REVIEW]Paul Kiparsky - 1991 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 19 (4):331-367.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark