Switch to: References

Citations of:

Dynamic Montague grammar

In L. Kalman (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Symposion on Logic and Language, Budapest, Eotvos Lorand University Press, 1990, pp. 3-48. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University Press. pp. 3-48 (1990)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dynamická logika.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2000 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 7 (3):338-348.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pozoruhodné logické systémy.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2000 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8:90-96.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • erG A.Brief Guide Resource-Sensitivity-A. - 2003 - In R. Oehrle & J. Kruijff (eds.), resource sensitivity, binding, and anaphora. kluwer.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Imperatives in conditional conjunction.Benjamin Russell - 2007 - Natural Language Semantics 15 (2):131-166.
    This paper provides evidence for an ambiguity of bare VPs in the English conditional conjunction construction. This ambiguity, undetected by previous researchers, provides a key to the development of a compositional semantic analysis of conditional conjunction with imperative first conjuncts. The analysis combines existing semantic theories of imperatives, the future tense, modal subordination, and speech act conjunction to yield the correct semantics without further stipulation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Bare plurals and donkey anaphora.Peter Lasersohn - 1997 - Natural Language Semantics 5 (1):79-86.
    Generically interpreted bare plural noun phrases license donkey anaphora. This fact has unexpected consequences both for the analysis of generics and for the analysis of donkey anaphors. Specifically, if we assume a kindsbased analysis of bare plurals as in Carlson (1980), we will be forced to give up the idea that donkey anaphors are variables – presumably in favor of an E-type analysis. Conversely, if we assume that donkey anaphors are variables, we will be forced to give up Carlson’s treatment (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Montague semantics.Theo M. V. Janssen - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Border Crossings.Jan van Eijck - unknown
    It is well established by now that computer science has a number of concerns in common with natural language understanding. Common themes show up in particular with algorithmic aspects of text processing. This chapter gives an overview of border crossings from NLP to CS and back. Starting out from syntactic analysis, we trace our route via a philosophical puzzle about meaning, Hoare correctness rules for dynamic semantics, error state analysis of presupposition, equational reasoning about state change, programming with frameworks originally (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Meaning in Motion.Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof - 2000 - In Klaus von Heusinger & Urs Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 47--78.
    The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of meaning. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric definite and indefinite descriptions, which are treated as contextually dependent quantificational expressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the difference between monologue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Changez le contexte!Frank Veltman, Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof - 1996 - Langage 123:08-29.
    a la base de cet article a ´ et´ e pr´ esent´ ee ` a la cinqui` eme ‘Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory’ qui s’est tenue ` a Austin, Texas, en F´ evrier 1995, et va paraˆıtre dans les actes de celle-ci. Nous aimerions remercier les participants `.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Program semantics and classical logic.Reinhard Muskens - 1997) - In CLAUS Report Nr 86. Saarbrücken: University of the Saarland. pp. 1-27.
    In the tradition of Denotational Semantics one usually lets program constructs take their denotations in reflexive domains, i.e. in domains where self-application is possible. For the bulk of programming constructs, however, working with reflexive domains is an unnecessary complication. In this paper we shall use the domains of ordinary classical type logic to provide the semantics of a simple programming language containing choice and recursion. We prove that the rule of {\em Scott Induction\/} holds in this new setting, prove soundness (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exhaustivity in dynamic semantics; referential and descriptive pronouns.Robert Van Rooy - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (5):621-657.
    In this paper I argue that anaphoric pronouns should always be interpreted exhaustively. I propose that pronouns are either used referentially and refer to the speaker's referents of their antecedent indefinites, or descriptively and go proxy for the description recoverable from its antecedent clause. I show how this view can be implemented within a dynamic semantics, and how it can account for various examples that seemed to be problematic for the view that for all unbound pronouns there always should be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Weak vs. strong Readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inference in a dynamic setting.Makoto Kanazawa - 1994 - Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (2):109 - 158.
    In this paper, I show that the availability of what some authors have called the weak reading and the strong reading of donkey sentences with relative clauses is systematically related to monotonicity properties of the determiner. The correlation is different from what has been observed in the literature in that it concerns not only right monotonicity, but also left monotonicity (persistence/antipersistence). I claim that the reading selected by a donkey sentence with a double monotone determiner is in fact the one (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • Towards an explanation of copula effects.Gerhard Jäger - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5):557-593.
    This paper deals with a series of semantic contrasts between the copula be and the preposition as, two functional elements that both head elementary predication structures. It will be argued that the meaning of as is a type lowering device shifting the meaning of its complement NP from the type of generalized quantifiers to the type of properties (where properties are conceived as relations between individuals and situations), while the copula be induces a type coercion from (partial) situations to (total) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Introduction to natural language semantics, henriëtte de Swart.Katharina Hartmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (4):511-518.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dynamic semantics and circular propositions.Willem Groeneveld - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (3):267 - 306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A theory of anaphoric information.David A. H. Elworthy - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (3):297 - 332.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Intensionality and context change.Gennaro Chierchia - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2):141-168.
    It is arguably desirable to have a theory of meaning that (i) does not identify propositions with sets of worlds, (ii) enables to capture the dynamic character of semantic interpretation and (iii) provides the basis for a semantic program that incorporates and extends the achievements of Montague semantics. A theory of properties and propositions that meets these desiderata is developed and several applications to the semantic analysis of natural languages are explored.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations